AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 3 Posted July 3 3 minutes ago, Homelander said: That's what they voted for! Still haven't told us what you voted for.
Roundybout Posted July 3 Posted July 3 (edited) 3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: State and local governments. Feds down -7000. That’s a win. Other than that, it’s all just awful isn’t it? You REALLY should have bought the dip. Why is that a “win” to you? I don’t particularly care about manufacturing jobs, because it’s not 1951 anymore. I mention it because of the MAGA obsession with returning to brutal factory jobs. Edited July 3 by Roundybout
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 3 Posted July 3 Just now, Roundybout said: Why is that a “win” to you? I don’t particularly care about manufacturing jobs, because it’s not 1951 anymore. The people who work in manufacturing probably do. We all can't live the life of a government employee.
Roundybout Posted July 3 Posted July 3 2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The people who work in manufacturing probably do. We all can't live the life of a government employee. Then transition them to high-tech manufacturing in sectors like batteries. Oh wait. MAGA hates that.
Pokebball Posted July 3 Posted July 3 7 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Still haven't told us what you voted for. He doesn't vote for anything. He votes against everything
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 3 Posted July 3 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Then transition them to high-tech manufacturing in sectors like batteries. Oh wait. MAGA hates that. Ahhh yes, because that must be the only way forward.
JDHillFan Posted July 3 Posted July 3 26 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why is that a “win” to you? I don’t particularly care about manufacturing jobs, because it’s not 1951 anymore. I mention it because of the MAGA obsession with returning to brutal factory jobs. Because the federal government is bloated and inept. I realize that someone that believes millions of dollars of politico pro subscriptions is a necessary expenditure cannot understand that. Np. 1
Roundybout Posted July 3 Posted July 3 19 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Ahhh yes, because that must be the only way forward. What is your way forward? 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Because the federal government is bloated and inept. I realize that someone that believes millions of dollars of politico pro subscriptions is a necessary expenditure cannot understand that. Np. I think giving employees the tools to do their jobs correctly is a good thing, actually
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 3 Posted July 3 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: What is your way forward? Embrace all domestic manufacturing not just " high tech" sectors. 1
JDHillFan Posted July 3 Posted July 3 32 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What is your way forward? I think giving employees the tools to do their jobs correctly is a good thing, actually Not having millions of dollars worth of that tool is really going to hinder these poor civil servants. 1
Roundybout Posted July 3 Posted July 3 1 hour ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Embrace all domestic manufacturing not just " high tech" sectors. Most of those jobs are obsolete. We need to get better at solar, microchips, and other high tech. We don’t need investment in tin can factories 33 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Not having millions of dollars worth of that tool is really going to hinder these poor civil servants. This is like taking away Bloomberg terminals from stockbrokers
JDHillFan Posted July 3 Posted July 3 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Most of those jobs are obsolete. We need to get better at solar, microchips, and other high tech. We don’t need investment in tin can factories This is like taking away Bloomberg terminals from stockbrokers Is it really? How is government still “functioning”? How has the benefit of having access to politico pro been measured? How will the unavailability of politico pro be measured?
Roundybout Posted July 3 Posted July 3 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Is it really? How is government still “functioning”? How has the benefit of having access to politico pro been measured? How will the unavailability of politico pro be measured? It’s functioning because we built a robust government infrastructure over decades. However, it is certainly less efficient and informed because you didn’t want to pay 0.000005 cents to give these employees the data. Sorry you’re so poor.
JDHillFan Posted July 3 Posted July 3 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: It’s functioning because we built a robust government infrastructure over decades. However, it is certainly less efficient and informed because you didn’t want to pay 0.000005 cents to give these employees the data. Sorry you’re so poor. You didn’t address the question. How is the effectiveness of millions of dollars of politico pro subscriptions measured? Me poor? Please. I bought the dip! Rolling in it!!
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 3 Posted July 3 13 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Most of those jobs are obsolete. We need to get better at solar, microchips, and other high tech. We don’t need investment in tin can factories This is like taking away Bloomberg terminals from stockbrokers Lmao your bias blinds you. We need all types of industries not just high tech. Obsolete hardly.
Roundybout Posted July 3 Posted July 3 4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You didn’t address the question. How is the effectiveness of millions of dollars of politico pro subscriptions measured? Me poor? Please. I bought the dip! Rolling in it!! It’s an inane question. If people are informed, they do their jobs better. If they are not informed, they do their jobs worse. You didn’t even know Politico Pro existed before you were programmed to be against it. Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Lmao your bias blinds you. We need all types of industries not just high tech. Obsolete hardly. Why?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 3 Posted July 3 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: It’s an inane question. If people are informed, they do their jobs better. If they are not informed, they do their jobs worse. You didn’t even know Politico Pro existed before you were programmed to be against it. Why? Why what?
JDHillFan Posted July 3 Posted July 3 Just now, Roundybout said: You didn’t even know Politico Pro existed before you were programmed to be against it. This is correct. No programming necessary however. Common sense is all that’s needed to understand that the government should not be propping up a biased organization through millions of dollars of subscriptions to one of their products. Is politico pro a necessity to be informed? If you can’t measure its effectiveness, how do you know it’s of value? Your entire argument is “it’s information”. There will be zero real world impact associated with the cancellation of these subscriptions.
Roundybout Posted July 3 Posted July 3 Just now, JDHillFan said: This is correct. No programming necessary however. Common sense is all that’s needed to understand that the government should not be propping up a biased organization through millions of dollars of subscriptions to one of their products. Is politico pro a necessity to be informed? If you can’t measure its effectiveness, how do you know it’s of value? Your entire argument is “it’s information”. There will be zero real world impact associated with the cancellation of these subscriptions. The government can purchase whatever equipment or subscriptions it needs to help its workers do their job. I’m sorry that is a difficult concept for you. If I had my APA membership removed, I would be less informed and be a worse planner for it. 3 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Why what? Why should we prop up dead industries like tin manufacturing when other counties can do it for us cheaper?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted July 3 Posted July 3 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: The government can purchase whatever equipment or subscriptions it needs to help its workers do their job. I’m sorry that is a difficult concept for you. If I had my APA membership removed, I would be less informed and be a worse planner for it. Why should we prop up dead industries like tin manufacturing when other counties can do it for us cheaper? American workers need jobs roundy.......
Recommended Posts