Jump to content

Put our weapons with another team and qb


Drew21PA

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, SCBills said:

Our OL and weapons are both probably slightly above average.

 

Take Mahomes/Allen/Burrow out of it.. What does this Offense look like with Cousins, Carr etc..?  Probably reflective of the OL and weapons.  Slightly above average. 

 

Now if Kincaid becomes our 2, Davis slides down to 3... I have a very different opinion of our weapons.   But as of right now, our weapons are driven by Diggs, and everyone else, in their current role are... ok. 

 

As far as OC goes.. I honestly don't know.   JA is capable of doing so much, that at times it looks like we're doing "too much".  If we had a guy willing to constantly check it down, the ceiling isn't remotely as high, but the floor likely isn't as low as we've seen. 

 

 


I would actually remove anybody on a rookie deal/low cap number. I would remove Hurts as a comparable. He signed his deal but his cap number is $6M. He’s basically free, so the Eagles can do more around him.  
 

I think we could have and should have done more the last 4-6 years with Allen’s cap number. This is where our constant redrafting of RB, and DE’s that take 4 years to flash drives me nuts. We could and should be taking a pass catcher in the top 100 every year to every other. 

 

I do think this group is actually pretty good for a QB who is cap number is about to be $47M. The problem I have is the other years. 

I will say it for the 100th time, nobody is paying two WR’s with their QB on their second or third big contract. The Bills going out and spending $47M on Allen, $27M on Diggs, and $16M on Hopkins (trade) is a really bad idea. 
 

Going forward the offense will have to get by with Allen, Diggs, and a host of draft picks and cheap free agents. This is the way the NFL works once you pay your QB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DapperCam said:

I think it’s about equal. Kelce == Diggs, then both teams have a bunch of meh.

It all starts with Diggs and Kelce. And Kelce is a better one guy to have as he is more difficult to shut down.
I would argue Pacheco, Rice, and Moore have more upside than Cook, Davis, Shakir.

MVS and Hardman are better than Sherfield and Harty. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ngbills said:

It all starts with Diggs and Kelce. And Kelce is a better one guy to have as he is more difficult to shut down.
I would argue Pacheco, Rice, and Moore have more upside than Cook, Davis, Shakir.

MVS and Hardman are better than Sherfield and Harty. 

 

Kelce is THE best receiving weapon in the NFL.  

 

By far, my biggest annoyance when people discuss the Chiefs is their focus on WR's, as if they don't have the ultimate cheat code in Travis Kelce.  

 

Jefferson, Diggs, Adams etc., for one year, I'm not even thinking twice and taking Kelce as my first pick after a QB.

 

---

 

We really need Kincaid to pop, asap, because when you look at our weapons vs KC and cross out Diggs with Kelce, then go down the line.. it becomes embarrassing that we all thought our weapons were the best Allen's had in years, yet KC's ho hum group is still deeper.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...