Big Blitz Posted Tuesday at 06:12 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:12 PM 27 minutes ago, Homelander said: Why do you do this to yourself? It’s pathetic
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 06:29 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:29 PM 4 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Going good faith again I see. Can you show me someone making a claim that people should not be allowed to protest? They should. At all times. Not in all places. Peaceable assembly is good. People blocking roads are not protesting. They are being assh*les and preventing people from going about their business. That business might include dealing with a critical medical situation. Do you support the people damaging important art pieces? You shouldn’t. Those people are also assh*les. How do you differentiate between these two groups of assh*les? Standing in the road is harmless. Damaging art pieces is harmful. Im not surprised you can’t figure out the difference. You can’t read an academic paper, after all. 4 hours ago, Orlando Buffalo said: right wing position- protect the good and innocent( ya know the thread title) while the left protects the criminal and rioters. I can show what worries me, you have yet to show me a single instance where someone has done what you worry about without consequences. If that’s the case, why name it the “thump thump bill” if the intention is to NOT allow insane people to mow down protestors?
JFKjr Posted Tuesday at 06:46 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:46 PM 16 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Standing in the road is harmless. Damaging art pieces is harmful.
Orlando Buffalo Posted Tuesday at 06:54 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:54 PM 22 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Standing in the road is harmless. If an ambulance cant get to people because of them then it is very harmful, if I miss my flight then it is true harm, and if my dairy products go bad due to the heat then it is slightly harmful, but all are harmful and likely. The fact that you can't see that shows that you don't ever have to deal with the political consequences of your ideas.
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 06:57 PM Posted Tuesday at 06:57 PM 10 minutes ago, JFKjr said: Yes, I’m aware this is what right wingers want to do to protesters. 2 minutes ago, Orlando Buffalo said: If an ambulance cant get to people because of them then it is very harmful, if I miss my flight then it is true harm, and if my dairy products go bad due to the heat then it is slightly harmful, but all are harmful and likely. The fact that you can't see that shows that you don't ever have to deal with the political consequences of your ideas. So your solution is to smush them with your truck?
Orlando Buffalo Posted Tuesday at 07:06 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:06 PM 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: So your solution is to smush them with your truck? Keep them out of the street, but people act appropriate when they know the potential consequences. I will point out once again you are defending the criminal from having any repercussions from their crimes
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 07:08 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:08 PM Just now, Orlando Buffalo said: Keep them out of the street, but people act appropriate when they know the potential consequences. I will point out once again you are defending the criminal from having any repercussions from their crimes Standing in the road protesting is not a crime. You’ve deflected this entire time from the point of Fine’s bill, which is to allow people to run over protestors with their cars. What on earth is the matter with you?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Tuesday at 07:13 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:13 PM 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Standing in the road protesting is not a crime. You’ve deflected this entire time from the point of Fine’s bill, which is to allow people to run over protestors with their cars. What on earth is the matter with you? How thick is your skull? Protesting in the streets is harmful, they should be smeared into the pavement accordingly.
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 07:15 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:15 PM Just now, AlBUNDY4TDS said: How thick is your skull? Protesting in the streets is harmful, they should be smeared into the pavement accordingly. Another fine example of the “party of small government,” ladies and gentlemen!
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Tuesday at 07:16 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:16 PM Just now, Roundybout said: Another fine example of the “party of small government,” ladies and gentlemen! Your sad. Don't want to get run over? Don't protest in the street.
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 07:18 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:18 PM 1 minute ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Your sad. Don't want to get run over? Don't protest in the street. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man Should he just have moved then?
JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 07:21 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:21 PM 51 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Standing in the road is harmless. You’re a fool.
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 07:22 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:22 PM 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: You’re a fool. Im sorry you’re triggered by protestors in a street. Perhaps you’d like living in Myanmar better?
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Tuesday at 07:22 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:22 PM 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man Should he just have moved then? Oh no not a wiki link. Was he protesting in the street?
JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 07:23 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:23 PM Just now, Roundybout said: Im sorry you’re triggered by protestors in a street. Perhaps you’d like living in Myanmar better? You’ve been doing a lot of good faith arguing today. Kudos.
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted Tuesday at 07:24 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:24 PM 6 minutes ago, Roundybout said: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man Should he just have moved then? The fact you think this is even remotely similar tells me you are completely cooked.
Orlando Buffalo Posted Tuesday at 07:26 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:26 PM 14 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Standing in the road protesting is not a crime. You’ve deflected this entire time from the point of Fine’s bill, which is to allow people to run over protestors with their cars. What on earth is the matter with you? Standing in the road protesting IS a crime, at least in Florida, you have a right to assemble in public places but not on the middle of the road. So since we have now established that they are acting criminally do you still defend their right to act criminally? As for Fines bill of course I support it, since the only people who are protesting in the road are criminals and I don't protect criminals.
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 07:27 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:27 PM 1 minute ago, Orlando Buffalo said: Standing in the road protesting IS a crime, at least in Florida, you have a right to assemble in public places but not on the middle of the road. So since we have now established that they are acting criminally do you still defend their right to act criminally? As for Fines bill of course I support it, since the only people who are protesting in the road are criminals and I don't protect criminals. Your solution to dealing with “criminals” is to mow them down with your car? 4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You’ve been doing a lot of good faith arguing today. Kudos. It’s nice you picked up on the new words I taught you earlier. Maybe you can figure out how to read an academic paper too. 5 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: The fact you think this is even remotely similar tells me you are completely cooked. Why? People in the road are “criminals” as you and Orlando have said.
JDHillFan Posted Tuesday at 07:36 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:36 PM 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Your solution to dealing with “criminals” is to mow them down with your car? It’s nice you picked up on the new words I taught you earlier. Maybe you can figure out how to read an academic paper too. https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/protesters-rights You don’t need a permit to march in the streets or on sidewalks, as long as marchers don’t obstruct car or pedestrian traffic. Something about Myanmar. I’m perfectly fine with you believing what you do regarding academic papers surrounding trans issues. It gives you something to hold onto. You are having a day! Be thankful that you are not one of those loser manufacturing workers that are expected to produce something.
Roundybout Posted Tuesday at 07:42 PM Posted Tuesday at 07:42 PM 6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/protesters-rights You don’t need a permit to march in the streets or on sidewalks, as long as marchers don’t obstruct car or pedestrian traffic. Something about Myanmar. I’m perfectly fine with you believing what you do regarding academic papers surrounding trans issues. It gives you something to hold onto. You are having a day! Be thankful that you are not one of those loser manufacturing workers that are expected to produce something. “I should be able to execute protestors who mildly inconvenience me” is a hell of a way to go through life. Try yoga.
Recommended Posts