JDHillFan Posted September 6 Posted September 6 Just now, Roundybout said: Still doing this, eh? Yes. I will continue to quote you as these absurdities present themselves. Do you believe the offender in this case is a woman? The published article seems to suggest so. 1
Roundybout Posted September 6 Posted September 6 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said: Yes. I will continue to quote you as these absurdities present themselves. Do you believe the offender in this case is a woman? The published article seems to suggest so. Correct.
JDHillFan Posted September 6 Posted September 6 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Correct. Just for clarification - you believe the offender in this case is a woman? I don’t want to get it wrong.
Roundybout Posted September 6 Posted September 6 5 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Just for clarification - you believe the offender in this case is a woman? I don’t want to get it wrong. Says transgender woman to me 1
JFKjr Posted September 6 Posted September 6 11 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Yes. I will continue to quote you as these absurdities present themselves. Do you believe the offender in this case is a woman? The published article seems to suggest so. Not sure if this person has a constructed/fabricated cervix. I think that would be worth exploring!
JDHillFan Posted September 6 Posted September 6 4 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Says transgender woman to me Thank you. From the article: A child who was playing on the monkey bars in the park saw Mart holding her penis and wiggling it at her, This person is not a woman in any way. You have been lied to and have swallowed it whole. You will eventually understand that. Until you get to that point you should continue to rage about how wrong everyone else is. 1 1
Roundybout Posted September 6 Posted September 6 2 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Thank you. From the article: A child who was playing on the monkey bars in the park saw Mart holding her penis and wiggling it at her, This person is not a woman in any way. You have been lied to and have swallowed it whole. You will eventually understand that. Until you get to that point you should continue to rage about how wrong everyone else is. One day you’ll figure out the difference between sex and gender identity 1
JDHillFan Posted September 6 Posted September 6 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: One day you’ll figure out the difference between sex and gender identity lol. Will one of the other lefties here please step in? Edited September 6 by JDHillFan
JFKjr Posted September 6 Posted September 6 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: One day you’ll figure out the difference between sex and gender identity Gender identity depends not on biology but on social stereotypes. Interesting to see Libnuts lean into stereotypes. But, that's also why 'furries' are a thing. Wishful thinking.
Roundybout Posted September 6 Posted September 6 11 minutes ago, JFKjr said: Gender identity depends not on biology but on social stereotypes. Interesting to see Libnuts lean into stereotypes. But, that's also why 'furries' are a thing. Wishful thinking. Ok boomer
BillsFanNC Posted September 6 Author Posted September 6 "one day you'll be fully demoralized like me" -Roundy 😂 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 9 Author Posted September 9 😂 This guy wins the King hand waving award. 1 1
B-Man Posted September 10 Posted September 10 The 2nd Circuit has just ruled that Vermont must allow Mid Vermont Christian School back into the state’s athletic association—ending two years of exile over their religious belief that boys can’t become girls. Mid Vermont’s student athletes were banned from competition in 2023 after they followed their religious convictions, forfeiting a state tournament game which would have pitted their girls’ high school team against a male athlete who was over 6 feet tall. Shortly afterward, @ADFLegal helped them sue Vermont in federal court. Now the 2nd Circuit has ruled in their favor, citing Masterpiece Cakeshop—ADF’s well-known 2018 case on behalf of Colorado cake artist Jack Phillips. Similar to Masterpiece, the court here found that the Vermont Principals’ Association (VPA) likely violated the First Amendment by demonstrating impermissible hostility toward the school’s religious beliefs. For example, the VPA openly “attacked the validity” of the school’s religious beliefs, insisting that the girls should have been able to compete against a male athlete because Brigham Young University athletes don’t endorse Catholicism when they play against Notre Dame. That statement fundamentally misunderstands Mid Vermont’s religious beliefs. And as the 2nd Circuit correctly held, “the VPA may not impose discipline based on its view that Mid Vermont’s religious objection was ‘wrong.’” Even worse, a VPA official publicly denigrated the school’s religious convictions, calling them “blatant discrimination under the guise of religious freedom.” That official “publicly castigated Mid Vermont—and religious schools generally—while the VPA rushed to judgment on whether and how to discipline the school.” And the punishment the VPA imposed on the school—permanently banning all the school’s sports teams from the athletic association—was “unprecedented, overbroad, and procedurally irregular.” Today’s ruling stands as a rebuke to Vermont officials’ religious intolerance—and a vindication of Mid Vermont’s courage. I couldn’t be prouder of their coach and players for standing by their convictions, even under intense national scrutiny. https://x.com/KristenWaggoner/status/1965488086173057090
Recommended Posts