Tenhigh Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 43 minutes ago, 4th&long said: And you think they haven't been advocating for themselves? Nice try tho. Where did I say that?
rusty shackleford Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 59 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: I don't think "client" is the right word here. He was a money manager, and from what we can see he was good at that. I think the trafficking and assaults probably overlapped much more with his social cirle than his actual clients. Did he or Maxwell have a diary of all the terrible things that these monsters did? The answer to that is probably not, because of the danger it posed to Epstein himself. Sadly, in reality people are looking for a magic bullet that in all likelihood doesn't exist. Good point. Nobody cares who he managed money for, the public wants to know his child prostitution clients. And yes, a successful criminal wouldn't incriminate themselves with a bad people only list. He most likely covered up record keeping of the illegal activity using his real business as a front, which will just make it harder to decipher it all with him being dead.
Tenhigh Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 43 minutes ago, teef said: that point would be misled. there's been numerous documentaries on the subject where victims were interviewed. There's been countless press events where the victims have spoken out about the release, and didn't they address congress a few days ago before the final vote? they've more than advocated on their behalf, and now they need the government to take the next step and do what's right. To imply they haven't done enough or need to take this on completely by themselves doesn't seem right to me. Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best. 1
teef Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best. i do agree.
milfandcookies Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 14 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best. We are relying on politicians because the Department of Justice is failing us 1
Recommended Posts