BarleyNY Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 http://overthecap.com/thoughts-fletcher-cox-contract-extension/#more-12093 Here's OTC's breakdown of the deal, including comparisons to other big contracts defensive players have signed. Dareus is mentioned. FWIW, they don't think it'll impact Von Miller's deal much because it is largely in line with similar deals, not an outlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) The player it affects more than Miller is Mo Wilkerson. Same position and I think Wilkerson is better. Looks like Woody is cheap? "He has no long-term future (with NYJ). If there was any doubt, the Cox contract clinches it." http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york-jets/post/_/id/60914/mo-wilkerson-will-get-long-term-deal-someday-but-it-wont-be-from-jets Edited June 14, 2016 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 The player it affects more than Miller is Mo Wilkerson. Same position and I think Wilkerson is better. Looks like Woody is cheap? "He has no long-term future (with NYJ). If there was any doubt, the Cox contract clinches it." http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york-jets/post/_/id/60914/mo-wilkerson-will-get-long-term-deal-someday-but-it-wont-be-from-jets Man, the Jest are screwing the pooch. Their spending and personnel decisions are getting to be a mess. They have a bad cap situation, no QB and it looks like they're looking like they'll lose their best from 7 player after this season. Oh, and they'll lose him in part to retain a guy with big character issues who could be suspended indefinitely with one more screw up. That ship has full sails and is aimed right at some big rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) Man, the Jest are screwing the pooch. Their spending and personnel decisions are getting to be a mess. They have a bad cap situation, no QB and it looks like they're looking like they'll lose their best from 7 player after this season. Oh, and they'll lose him in part to retain a guy with big character issues who could be suspended indefinitely with one more screw up. That ship has full sails and is aimed right at some big rocks.they have a ton of money wrapped up in aging players (good players, but closer to decline than prime) like revis, Marshall, forte and mangold and don't pay young, elite homegrown players or their QB . Maybe they plan to pay Richardson instead but I wouldn't depend on him to stay out of trouble. Edited June 14, 2016 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 (edited) Had to figure that the great DLmen were fixing to cash in after that absurd contract that Malik Jackson got...that one still sickens me--$15M/year for a guy with 4 sacks last year (a career high by the way). As to Mo Wilkerson, I wonder if a team like Pittsburgh or Green Bay--who are (a) gearing up for a title run, (b) don't have that stalwart DLman, and © don't have franchise-defender-type money committed to any one player--would make a move to trade for him before TC. I suppose Washington could be a possibility as well when I consider the above criteria. Edited June 14, 2016 by thebandit27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Had to figure that the great DLmen were fixing to cash in after that absurd contract that Malik Jackson got...that one still sickens me--$15M/year for a guy with 4 sacks last year (a career high by the way). As to Mo Wilkerson, I wonder if a team like Pittsburgh or Green Bay--who are (a) gearing up for a title run, (b) don't have that stalwart DLman, and © don't have franchise-defender-type money committed to any one player--would make a move to trade for him before TC. I suppose Washington could be a possibility as well when I consider the above criteria. Did you see what GB signed mike Daniels for, compared to what the jags gave Malik Jackson? Mike Daniels: 4 yrs, $42 million Malik Jackson: 6 yrs, $85 million Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Did you see what GB signed mike Daniels for, compared to what the jags gave Malik Jackson? Mike Daniels: 4 yrs, $42 million Malik Jackson: 6 yrs, $85 million Indeed I did Yolo...and I remarked at the time that I felt Daniels was at least a comparable player. I was mistaken about Jackson's numbers though--he had 5 sacks last year, and had 6 in 2013. Still, he got close to the AAV of Mario Williams, which is patently absurd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 @gil_brandt Fletcher Cox's new contract has an average yearly salary of $17.1M with $63M guaranteed. It is second-highest non-QB deal in NFL history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted June 21, 2016 Author Share Posted June 21, 2016 @AaronWilson_NFL Fletcher Cox $110.399 million deal has $63.299 million guaranteed, including $26 million signing bonus, $6 million option bonus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 This is insane and it will only get bigger next superstar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxy312 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 @gil_brandt Fletcher Cox's new contract has an average yearly salary of $17.1M with $63M guaranteed. It is second-highest non-QB deal in NFL history. You know that unless the salary cap ceases growing that this is basically going to happen every year, right? With roster sizes constant; a CBA agreed league minimum based on experience; and a requirement for teams to spend 97.5% of whatever the cap is; they're going to keep signing bigger and bigger contracts for talented players at key positions. Is Fletcher Cox better or more valuable than Marcel Dareus? It's debatable of course, but last year's $95m with $60m guaranteed seemed big at the time for Dareus. Cox now getting $102.6m with $63.3m to me is simply that escalation taking the expected form. At the end of the day, I think 9-figure contracts with $50m+ guaranteed are going to be the norm for teams best players. It's what the market is paying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I hate to tell you this, dudes, but Cox extensions aren't real. Hopefully you didn't spend $103 million to find out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 You know that unless the salary cap ceases growing that this is basically going to happen every year, right? With roster sizes constant; a CBA agreed league minimum based on experience; and a requirement for teams to spend 97.5% of whatever the cap is; they're going to keep signing bigger and bigger contracts for talented players at key positions. Is Fletcher Cox better or more valuable than Marcel Dareus? It's debatable of course, but last year's $95m with $60m guaranteed seemed big at the time for Dareus. Cox now getting $102.6m with $63.3m to me is simply that escalation taking the expected form. At the end of the day, I think 9-figure contracts with $50m+ guaranteed are going to be the norm for teams best players. It's what the market is paying. Yep...watch what Aaron Donald and Kawann Short get next offseason. Escalation has never been more apparent than this offseason, when a guy like Dwayne Allen--who has 47 receptions total over the past 3 seasons--gets more money AAV than Charles Clay, who had 51 catches in 13 games last year. Throw in a guy like Damon Harrison, who got $9M AAV despite playing a mere 53% of the Jets' defensive snaps last year, and we've hit lunacy when it comes to overpaying on the open market. In light of that, we wonder why a guy like Gilmore thinks he's worth $15M AAV...the answer, of course, is that he'll get it on the open market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxy312 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Yep...watch what Aaron Donald and Kawann Short get next offseason. Escalation has never been more apparent than this offseason, when a guy like Dwayne Allen--who has 47 receptions total over the past 3 seasons--gets more money AAV than Charles Clay, who had 51 catches in 13 games last year. Throw in a guy like Damon Harrison, who got $9M AAV despite playing a mere 53% of the Jets' defensive snaps last year, and we've hit lunacy when it comes to overpaying on the open market. In light of that, we wonder why a guy like Gilmore thinks he's worth $15M AAV...the answer, of course, is that he'll get it on the open market. If he could stay healthy, I do think he would be worth that much. None the less, my understanding is that Norman has missed just as many games as Gilmore has and is in that range. So why wouldn't he be in that discussion? Hard to say IMO. When he's on the field, he's an every down corner you want on your opponent's #1 WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarleyNY Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 (edited) http://overthecap.com/fletcher-cox-contract-analytics/#more-12095 OTC's breakdown of the final deal. Edited June 21, 2016 by BarleyNY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 its just a crazy swirling vortex of money at this point that has to land somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8-8 Forever? Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 I know how it works. I just don't care for these leaps in salaries neverending. 100 and 3 million dollars for four or five years of work. just step back and think about that stop watching and going to the games and all the numbers will go down... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 stop watching and going to the games and all the numbers will go down... I don't go to games and i spend no money. I watch TV with Rabbit ears. I do not feed the machine. ha! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted June 22, 2016 Author Share Posted June 22, 2016 @SiriusXMNFL NEW at SiriusXM NFL Radio Blog: Cox on #Eagles’ D not creating enough negative plays: "That’s going to change." https://goo.gl/UNjN5e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts