Rob's House Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 huh? Sorry I'm not sure what that's a reference to? but when I google'd jay cutler PSYCHO I got a lot of hits It's a Kingpin reference. I assumed you inteneded to post in the Cutler thread and accidentally ended up in this one, but if I didn't know that and was just looking at this thread it looked like a crazy person throwing out unrelated non sequiters; hence ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trader Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 The Miami game is a huge one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I want them to squish the fish's playoff hopes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjmac Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Squishing the fish is always good. playoffs or no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leelee Phoenix Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I think winning at @NE would mean something. I hate the "culture" stuff, but that would be a nice thing to look back on all offseason and would be a shot of confidence for next year that you don't automatically lose the division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesdawg Posted December 16, 2013 Author Share Posted December 16, 2013 I think winning at @NE would mean something. I hate the "culture" stuff, but that would be a nice thing to look back on all offseason and would be a shot of confidence for next year that you don't automatically lose the division. Agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 I think winning at @NE would mean something. I hate the "culture" stuff, but that would be a nice thing to look back on all offseason and would be a shot of confidence for next year that you don't automatically lose the division. Only if the Pats* are playing to win and not playing to not get injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 It's a Kingpin reference. I assumed you inteneded to post in the Cutler thread and accidentally ended up in this one, but if I didn't know that and was just looking at this thread it looked like a crazy person throwing out unrelated non sequiters; hence ... Yep, I clicked on the wrong thread. oops Only if the Pats* are playing to win and not playing to not get injured. when don't the Putrids play to win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 And boy is that a big "if"... Do you feel more confident about a 7-9 Bills team heading into 2014, or will it not make much of a difference either way? For me personally, if this team managed to win these last three games it would say a lot about what type of coach Marrone is and how capable he is of actually getting through to these younger players. If we finish 6-10 or 5-11, I'm honestly not going to have much of a reason to care about next season. But a 3-0 finish would be a dramatic turnaround for a team that hasn't had a winning record in December in almost a decade (or even ended the season on a multiple game winning streak in Lord knows how long for that matter). Not to mention, IF we win against Miami and New England, it would mean that we had won the last game against all three of our AFC East rivals. Heck yes, I would feel better about next year. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 (edited) when don't the Putrids play to win? Like most playoff bound teams, when there is nothing to gain from winning and everything to lose by having starters injured. Being Bills fans though we have forgotten what that is like Edited December 16, 2013 by CodeMonkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted December 16, 2013 Share Posted December 16, 2013 Like most playoff bound teams, when there is nothing to gain from winning and everything to lose by having starters injured. Being Bills fans though we have forgotten what that is like History shows you're wrong. BB historically does NOT rest his players, even when the Patsies are locked into their playoff spot. He has always followed this philosophy, even to the detriment of his roster. That end of season injury to Welker a few years back comes to mind. The guy just believes in continuity vs rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts