Astrobot Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I suspect our positional needs (shown here for each team) have switched, so I am conducting a poll. This will affect future mock drafts on DraftTek. I have made it real by selecting players downstream from our picks in each round, using several mock drafts. I don't believe all players will go in the round specified; e.g., we may need to reach for Mike Glennon in RD1 b/c he won't be there at #41. I haven't included the option of drafting QB in RD3. Which 3-rounder described below would you like most for improving this team with these coaches? A: Draft QB, then WR, then OLB Example Using Players Still Available IMHO: 1-Geno Smith Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Mike Glennon QB 2-Justin Hunter, Robert Woods, DeAndre Hopkins WR 3-Chase Thomas OLB43 B: Draft WR, then QB, then OLB 1-Cordarrelle Patterson, Keenan Allen, Tavon Austin WR 2-Ryan Nassib, Tyler Bray, QB 3-Chase Thomas OLB43 C: Draft OLB, then QB, then WR 1-Jarvis Jones, Sam Montgomery, Ogletree OLB34 2-Justin Hunter, Robert Woods, DeAndre Hopkins WR 3-E.J. Manuel, Landry Jones QB D: Draft QB, then OLB, then WR 1-Geno Smith Matt Barkley, Tyler Wilson, Mike Glennon QB 2-Michael Buchanan, Khaseem Greene OLB 3-Quinton Patton, Tavarres King, Aaron Dobson, Stedman Bailey WR You may certainly mix and match players; I'm more interested in seeing if our positional preferences have changed since last month. --Astro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsInMaine Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 This is a tough one because I feel our needs go: 1. QB then in a distant second place... 2. WR/OLB Both are equivalent needs, it just depends on who is there in the 2nd, and how the trends during the draft go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
910BillsFan Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEAST MODE BABY! Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 C, but you have C as OLB, WR then QB...so, you need to update that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanC883 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 If Dion Jordan or Olgetree is available, def. LB. Otherwise, perhaps WR or DE. At any rate, this draft should be interesting. Even more so than most years, no one will have any idea what will happen until its happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPS Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I hate 'em all. The available players just don't fit. I hate Patterson idea. Geno Smith is just okay. Jones has spinal stenosis. He got away with it in college, but he will be going up against bigger, faster dudes and I'd remove him from my draft board. I'd go OL, QB, TE, but would be open to DL/LB in the 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 C. I would be curious to see a OLB/WR/QB. I think some top WR's could slip to the 2nd with a frenzy on some positions like QB coming in the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I suspect our positional needs (shown here for each team) have switched, so I am conducting a poll. This will affect future mock drafts on DraftTek. Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaybee Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think? I sure hope not. Instant credibility killer !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I understand the intent of the poll but ultimately it comes down to an individual player, not a position group AFAIC. But I did vote for C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Do you really base your positional needs on what all of us idiots think? Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
San Jose Bills Fan Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us! Yep. The joke's on…who is the joke on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Lightning Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Hummm, option C I guess. I want to like Barkley at #8 but just can't get there yet. Our LB's truly suck so let's start there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibs Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Haha. You called yourself an idiot for being one of us! Come to think of it.....my point would have been made clearer had I instead said.... "Do you really base your positional needs on what all of the idiots here think?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts