Jump to content

Election Gameday Thread


fjl2nd

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 281
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

 

1. Yes. I agree that Rev. Al and a bunch of other race-baiters would Uncle Tom a black GOP candidate. I don't think that the GOP would be too accepting. But I also think that there would be a lot of angst amongst the black political pundit establishment.

 

2. Yes. Romney was a bad choice.

You'd be surprised. Most politically active conservatives & libertarians are all about the philosophies & ideas. I went to YAF in '03 & the headliner who everyone was most excited to hear (more than Ann Coulter, Fred Barnes, Jonah Goldberg, or The Ultimate Warrior - all of whom spoke) was Walter Williams. Why? Because WW is !@#$ing sweet. It was genuine admiration, not like the **** you see from moderates who love(d) to talk about how they had as much or more respect for Colon Powell than anyone, to show how fair minded & not racist they were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In debate terminology, this is what you call "Moving the goalposts".

Go back and find one post where I said bad polls = Romney wins.

 

You can't. I am not an idiot. That's something you would have said.

 

I repeatedly said "none of this means Obama will lose". What I did say: somebody, either Axelrod or Gallup is going to be in trouble on Wednesday.

 

And the polls, with a D+6 or higher turnout...do not make sense...still.

 

What I think we're going to find out about this: how we do polling has to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It was nuclear weapons reduction treaties. Oh the horror.

Don't be simple. The rest of the world isn't reducing their nukes. That's the reality. & There's no harm in us having them as long as we don't use them. Why reduce your arsenal enough to enable someone else to beat you in a nuclear war? MAD worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't be simple. The rest of the world isn't reducing their nukes. That's the reality. & There's no harm in us having them as long as we don't use them. Why reduce your arsenal enough to enable someone else to beat you in a nuclear war? MAD worked.

 

We have 5k nukes right now. Even cutting that in half would still be enough to blow any continent to hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my God! Obama* has won using small tactics and failed policies. I hope all the blind sheep that voted for Obama* this time will remember this day. The day that changed this once great Country for ever. Four years of failure after failure and lie after lie...We deserve better. I smell large scale voter fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then what's the benefit of cutting it in half?

 

The idea I believe is that we have plenty so if we can cut some that we have over what we need (which is a lot) to get others to cut them and reduce the amount floating around to be stolen or sold then it's a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my God! Obama* has won using small tactics and failed policies. I hope all the blind sheep that voted for Obama* this time will remember this day. The day that changed this once great Country for ever. Four years of failure after failure and lie after lie..We deserve better. I smell large scale voter fraud.

It depends on who you mean by "we". Millions of us do deserve better. But as a society we deserve what we get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my God! Obama* has won using small tactics and failed policies. I hope all the blind sheep that voted for Obama* this time will remember this day. The day that changed this once great Country for ever. Four years of failure after failure and lie after lie...We deserve better. I smell large scale voter fraud.

Dude...

 

I think the storm is a larger issue than voter fraud. And, none of it is as big as whether social conservatives are forcing the Rs to do stupid things....like lose the the Senate that was easily theirs to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...