NoSaint Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 (edited) Vilma is maintaining that mike cerullo (the anonymous source) not only fabricated evidence but also retracted his statements in April. Vilma is pushing for his suspension to be blocked as he claims the league is not acting in good faith. Keeps getting messier. Is the general feeling still that the league is holding back a smoking gun or is there starting to be some questioning out there about what they might actually be hiding? Im hearing rumblings in the media more and more but the public seems slow to question. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/01/vilma-files-new-lawsuit-against-the-nfl/ Edited July 1, 2012 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanInUticaTampa Posted July 1, 2012 Share Posted July 1, 2012 I think there is probably more than cerullos notes and testimony as far as evidence goes. But think the league was pretty foolish to ban vilma for a whole year. Goodwell keeps saying front office and coaches are held up to a higher standard, but why is vilma getting the same one year that payton and loomis are getting? This whole thing with the lawsuits and questioning the evidence might have blown over by now if they just suspended vilma for one or two games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry Jabber Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Maybe Vilma donated the most money as a player, or had the most player involvement in the bounty scandal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) The suit is not about Vilma at all. It's an end run by the NFLPA to get at the names of those who talked. Vilma is going to be sore when the NFLPA gets what it wants and leaves him hanging. Edited July 2, 2012 by jeremy2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted July 2, 2012 Author Share Posted July 2, 2012 (edited) The suit is not about Vilma at all. It's an end run by the NFLPA to get at the names of those who talked. Vilma is going to be sore when the NFLPA gets what it wants and leaves him hanging. Mike cerullo is the man who spoke. As of now, there's no indication players spoke minus the Hargrove stuff. Edited July 2, 2012 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justnzane Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 I think there is probably more than cerullos notes and testimony as far as evidence goes. But think the league was pretty foolish to ban vilma for a whole year. Goodwell keeps saying front office and coaches are held up to a higher standard, but why is vilma getting the same one year that payton and loomis are getting? This whole thing with the lawsuits and questioning the evidence might have blown over by now if they just suspended vilma for one or two games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 Mike cerullo is the man who spoke. As of now, there's no indication players spoke minus the Hargrove stuff. The NFLPA should have addressed Goodell's authority during the negotiations for the CBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARCELL DAREUS POWER Posted July 2, 2012 Share Posted July 2, 2012 !@#$ goddell. we all know what this is really about... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts