Jrock6986 Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Heres my projection of the first 9 picks into the 2nd round St. Louis- R. Randle Indy- C. Fleener Baltimore- J. Worthy Denver-P. Konz Cleveland- C. Glenn Jax- C.Upshaw St.Louis- L. David Carolina- D. Still Buffalo- Jonathan Martin Im a very happy Buffalo Bills fan if they can land Stephon Gilmore and Jonathan Martin with their first 2 picks of this draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r00tabaga Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Doubt Upshaw will work best in a 4-3. Good analysis otherwise. Not sure I would take Martin over Massie or Adams though. And I'd rather see them take a flyer on a burner here like Hill or maybe grab another Gamecock in Jeffrey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biglukes Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 My projection is that no matter who we take at every pick, some people will hate it and curse the team's very existence. As for a player, if he's there at our first pick tomorrow, Reuben Randle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billnutinphoenix Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I hope Martin is there in round 2... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAWNDO Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I would be happy with Martin still being there. I think they need to go OT over WR with the second pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckeyeBill Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 More of a hole at Tackle than WR. Take Glenn/Martin/Massie instead of the WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marauderswr80 Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I say build the trenches and go OT. But I wouldnt be upset with a WR. But remember games are won and lost in the trenches! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Estro Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I think it'll come down to their highest rated OT. Let me throw this out there, though: If Lavonte David were on the board at #41 and we took him, think about how nasty our D could be: Adding a CB who will compete for a starting spot (Gilmore), and a LB who will compete for a starting spot to go along with our offseason addition of Williams and Anderson, would be pretty sick. The two guys I'm licking my chops for are : Lavonte David and Cordy Glenn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billshank Redemption Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Id prefer Martin to Glenn, I think long term he can be a decent starter at lt just not now. If I had my choice of all the players I would choose Randle, Hill, Martin, David, Glenn. I think Randles skill set is too much to pass up. If he has a Q.B he's a surefire first rounder. I do agree that David would instantly at least in my biased opinion make us have a top 7 defense. Martin would provide excellent depth at both tackle positions while Randle or Hill (would take more time but has excellent hands and speed which you can't coach) would immediately start opposite stevie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Barbarian Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Heres my projection of the first 9 picks into the 2nd round St. Louis- R. Randle Indy- C. FleenerJohnathan Martin Baltimore- J. Worthy Denver-P. Konz Cleveland- C. Glenn Jax- C.Upshaw St.Louis- L. David Carolina- D. Still Buffalo- Jonathan Martin Coby Fleener Im a very happy Buffalo Bills fan if they can land Stephon Gilmore and Jonathan Martin with their first 2 picks of this draft Much better now. I really think as much as Indy wants Fleener they need to keep Luck from getting Killed more and will get his Old Teammate to protect his Blindside And Chan wants a big down field target and none fits that better than Fleener Not even Hill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowery4 Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 Much better now. I really think as much as Indy wants Fleener they need to keep Luck from getting Killed more and will get his Old Teammate to protect his Blindside And Chan wants a big down field target and none fits that better than Fleener Not even Hill. Wow, I actually agree with with you (and for the most part I never do but I like you anyway). I will be so stoked if that happens, but I still don't see it happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbb Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 How many picks will Stanford have in the first two rounds? Yet, somehow everybody is still picking them to be in the top 15 at least again this year. It seems half their offense is high round picks this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcbillsfan Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I would be happy with Adams, Massie or glenn. I am not a martin guy that said if Buddy and his team thinks he is the best tackle left so be it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiebills Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 we got to go OT in the 2nd if we want a starter unglamorous but then again when has Buffalo been glamorous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 (edited) More of a hole at Tackle than WR. Take Glenn/Martin/Massie instead of the WR I disagree. After Stevie we got nuttin'. I don't want to wait until 3rd round to get a WR. Give me Best WRA round 2 and Best OTA rd 3 and I'll be happy. Also in rd 2 you can find WRs worthy of #42 overall. iMO the OTs have too many question marks Edited April 27, 2012 by Joe_the_6_pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 I disagree. After Stevie we got nuttin'. I don't want to wait until 3rd round to get a WR. Give me Best WRA round 2 and Best OTA rd 3 and I'll be happy. Also in rd 2 you can find WRs worthy of #42 overall. iMO the OTs have too many question marks Personally, I suspect they go best OT on their board at 41 and then if there are WR's they like available later in the round they package our 3rd with a 4 or 5 and move back in to grab them. If they did that (depending on who they are), I'd be happy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 41 right, forgot about Saints* I like your thinking but again Id swap WR for OT in it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombstone56 Posted April 27, 2012 Share Posted April 27, 2012 REMEMBER HOW PO ED THURMAN WAS MISING THE FIRST RD.. TAKE UPSHAW ,,BUT I WOULDNT MIND MASSIE.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts