Robchester Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 I don't recall exactly how big Pete Metzelaars was, but this kid looks huge. He looks reasonably athletic and can catch the ball. Hard to believe he was cut from another team. Anyone know why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 He wasn't cut. We signed him off the practice squad. The Cowboys were stacked at TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 You're right about the size comparison. Pete Metzelaars was 6-7 254. Chandler's 6-7 268. I don't know why NYG, SD and Dallas didn't want to keep him. He runs a 4.78 40 according to nfldraftscout.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Chan must have seen something he liked in him--- he was signed late last year and even "started" a game for us, making his first career reception in the win in Miami, and re-signed for 2011. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost of Rob Johnson Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 He wasn't cut. We signed him off the practice squad. The Cowboys were stacked at TE. He was cut, we tried to sign Rucker off their PS, they retained Rucker and cut Chandler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfaninvgs Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 He is the reason they didnt go after a big name in FA... I think he will fill the void at TE. He is a big dude. Looked like he is doing a good job on practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 He was cut, we tried to sign Rucker off their PS, they retained Rucker and cut Chandler. my bad, that's right, That sly Buddy pulled one over on the Cowgirls! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 He is a big dude. Could be Paul Seymour 2.0 or Pauly Shore, Jr. Who knows. If it's the former, it would be a real bonus for the running game. The slot WR most likely will get most of the catches that typically go to the TE anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starrymessenger Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Chandler has excellent hands, as his career as a Hawkeye demonstrates. He was actually a WR before becoming a TE. He was definitely not outclassed by Miller or Boss at the combine. He has been buried in the depth chart behind probowl type guys in SD and in Dallas. He is certainly big enuf to be an effective blocker, and has athleticism. He is a very good prospect. Good job Buddy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wagon Circler Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 ralph[ is the reason they didnt go after a big name in FA... I think he will fill the void at TE. He is a big dude. Looked like he is doing a good job on practice. Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FluffHead Posted August 6, 2011 Share Posted August 6, 2011 I may be wrong but I think he was originally drafted by San Diego while buddy was there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsWatch Posted August 6, 2011 Share Posted August 6, 2011 I may be wrong but I think he was originally drafted by San Diego while buddy was there Drafted by the San Diego Chargers in the 4th round of the 2007 NFL Draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts