BeastMode54 Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 All I know about him is that he projects as a RT (but some say he could lay LT). And that he ran a 4.8 40. Anyone else have any decent info on him. Could he be a decent pick at 9?
Magox Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 BeastMode54 said: All I know about him is that he projects as a RT (but some say he could lay LT). And that he ran a 4.8 40. Anyone else have any decent info on him. Could he be a decent pick at 9? Just watching him at the combine, and seeing those quick feet tells me that he could play the LT position.
BeastMode54 Posted March 9, 2010 Author Posted March 9, 2010 Magox said: Just watching him at the combine, and seeing those quick feet tells me that he could play the LT position. But what about at 9? Could he be a decent pick there?
3rdnlng Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 BeastMode54 said: All I know about him is that he projects as a RT (but some say he could lay LT). And that he ran a 4.8 40. Anyone else have any decent info on him. Could he be a decent pick at 9? He'd better be able to run if he is going to attempt that with our LT
Magox Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 BeastMode54 said: But what about at 9? Could he be a decent pick there? dunno
DanInUticaTampa Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 I don't like him at 9. I would rather take dan williams at 9 over trent williams.
manbeast Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 BeastMode54 said: All I know about him is that he projects as a RT (but some say he could lay LT). And that he ran a 4.8 40. Anyone else have any decent info on him. Could he be a decent pick at 9? Given the fact that Okung will not be there I like Campbell and Williams. Some people believe that with Buluga what you see is what you get. The line of thinking is that he is ready from day one but he is not going to get much better. which isn't a bad thing because it means there is little risk. He won't be there so Davis is falling and Campbell and Williams are rising. I love Campbells attitude and he did very well at the combine his measurables are a wet dream so if the choice comes down to Campbell, Williams and Davis. The way I listed them is my order.
manbeast Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 DanInUticaTampa said: I don't like him at 9. I would rather take dan williams at 9 over trent williams. If we take a NT it won't be at 9 we will have traded down.
Conch Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 manbeast said: Given the fact that Okung will not be there I like Campbell and Williams. Some people believe that with Buluga what you see is what you get. The line of thinking is that he is ready from day one but he is not going to get much better. which isn't a bad thing because it means there is little risk. He won't be there so Davis is falling and Campbell and Williams are rising. I love Campbells attitude and he did very well at the combine his measurables are a wet dream so if the choice comes down to Campbell, Williams and Davis. The way I listed them is my order. Maybe we can go to the NFL and say "look we really suck can we take three players at #9"
SKRAAPY Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 BeastMode54 said: All I know about him is that he projects as a RT (but some say he could lay LT). And that he ran a 4.8 40. Anyone else have any decent info on him. Could he be a decent pick at 9? No more Trents
Doc Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Williams' 23 reps of 225# concerns me. Other than that, he'd be the ideal pick at LT.
DarthICE Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 BeastMode54 said: All I know about him is that he projects as a RT (but some say he could lay LT). And that he ran a 4.8 40. Anyone else have any decent info on him. Could he be a decent pick at 9? He is a RT no matter what he thinks.
John from Riverside Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Why do people care about 40 times when it comes to OL? Side to side agility drills is what you should be paying attention to.......and of course their actual play on the field in college.
Trader Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 BeastMode54 said: All I know about him is that he projects as a RT (but some say he could lay LT). And that he ran a 4.8 40. Anyone else have any decent info on him. Could he be a decent pick at 9? I would endorse that
Kingfish Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Mayock on Path to The Draft just said that TW has really helped himself with the combine and his pro day.
manbeast Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 Conch said: Maybe we can go to the NFL and say "look we really suck can we take three players at #9" In my dream world we would be awarded 32 compensatory picks all at the end of round 1.
Recommended Posts