DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 while we are at it lets just keep interracial couples from getting married.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 Is it (marriage as a secular institution) really necessary in today's age? (Blue) Men and woman have the same equal protection now compared to other bygone eras. Isn't that what wills are for? (Green) Because gay marriage is off the societal baseline/norm and sharing more benefits costs society more. Deviant behavior and lifestyle's should pay more. (Red) Again... This whole issue is about defining a line and setting limits. But, I am an idiot... So who cares. You aren't an idiot. You just have an opinion that is different from the norm. I sure hope you never lose the right to have that opinion, because the oversized government has stepped in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 You just have an opinion that is different from the norm. The norm seems to be not allowing gay unions to be recognized as "marriage" by the state/gov't. I have an opinion that doesn't fit what the others are saying. I believe it is a sound social opinion when weighing all the issues. Like JA said... We are just gonna have to die off. Me personally, I really don't think that is going to do the trick when it comes to this subject. Take a look at the numbers... Even liberal uber-nanny state is saying no way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 The norm seems to be not allowing gay unions to be recognized as "marriage" by the state/gov't. I have an opinion that doesn't fit what the others are saying. I believe it is a sound social opinion when weighing all the issues. Like JA said... We are just gonna have to die off. Me personally, I really don't think that is going to do the trick when it comes to this subject. Take a look at the numbers... Even liberal uber-nanny state is saying no way. I don't understand why marriage has to exist at all. Aside from tax benefits, what is the real value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RkFast Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Kind of on a seperate note...its kinda funny that the close-minded right wing redneck evangelical hotbed of Houston Texas elected a lesbian mayor...yet liberal, open minded, tolerant New York defeated gay marriage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 The norm seems to be not allowing gay unions to be recognized as "marriage" by the state/gov't. I have an opinion that doesn't fit what the others are saying. I believe it is a sound social opinion when weighing all the issues. Like JA said... We are just gonna have to die off. Me personally, I really don't think that is going to do the trick when it comes to this subject. Take a look at the numbers... Even liberal uber-nanny state is saying no way. Your characterization is wrong there. The nanny-state is both Democratic and Republican. The Republicans want motherment to protect them from where people put their cocks in their bedrooms. And how people marry. And from saying "breasts" on TV. Younger people don't care if gays marry. At all. Die and the problem is easily solved. Actually, in about 10 years when the generation ahead of you is dead, the problem will be solved so you'll see it in your lifetime. Right now the fight is close so it can be brought. In another decade the fight will be over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Your characterization is wrong there. The nanny-state is both Democratic and Republican. The Republicans want motherment to protect them from where people put their cocks in their bedrooms. And how people marry. And from saying "breasts" on TV. Younger people don't care if gays marry. At all. Die and the problem is easily solved. Actually, in about 10 years when the generation ahead of you is dead, the problem will be solved so you'll see it in your lifetime. Right now the fight is close so it can be brought. In another decade the fight will be over. Does that include lawyers? (Red) Be careful what you wish for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledInIllinois Posted December 22, 2009 Share Posted December 22, 2009 Kind of on a seperate note...its kinda funny that the close-minded right wing redneck evangelical hotbed of Houston Texas elected a lesbian mayor...yet liberal, open minded, tolerant New York defeated gay marriage. It is about that. It is about the societal line between what is deviant and what is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Does that include lawyers? (Red) Be careful what you wish for. Everyone dies. I just know that when I'm dead, this will be one issue long past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 It is about that. It is about the societal line between what is deviant and what is not. And we need our government to decide that for us. And we need them to invade our houses and bedrooms to make sure we follow their strict orders.......That is what the US of A is all about! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DELLAPELLE JOHN Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 this is what happens when religion takes over.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 this is what happens when religion takes over.... Hey AD Personal "crusades" (posting the same information/opinion in an excessively repetitive manner. We want posters to share opinions not bludgeon others to death with them.) I would think this would seem to fit at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Hey AD I would think this would seem to fit at this point. Not until he posts four times in a row in the same thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle_chappy Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 http://www.southbendtribune.com/article/20...6/-1/googleNews the battle moves to indiana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts