Jump to content

Fezmid

Community Member
  • Posts

    14,348
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fezmid

  1. One tip is to mark the post as OT: http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=19628 Edit your post and click the "OT" radio button on the bottom of the page, then submit. CW
  2. Sorry; I've heard others in the media say that he's contradicted himself and therefore he's just trying to get the money, and made the asumption that's what you were saying. I appologize. CW
  3. If you're saying that the husband is contradicting himself, and therefore can't be believed, how can you believe the charges against Jackson? There's been tons of contradictions in that case as well. CW
  4. Well then, Michael Jackson must be innocent then, because we've heard the kids on the stand saying completely different things, and also things that are contrary to what they've said previously. And you know, they stand to benefit financially from that lawsuit, so they must be bad people! CW
  5. That'll happen in preseason too CW
  6. I wasn't saying they were related, only questioning JPL's durability. I've read a bunch of posts in the past saying that JPL isn't injury prone, that one injury in training camp doesn't mean anything. I didn't realize that he was (mildly) injured in college as well. RJ had a lot of unrelated injuries as well... CW
  7. My post wasn't indignant at all -- I was just wondering how NE and Phi received so many compensatory picks based on the fact that they picked up Dillon and Owens. There was no anger or bitterness to be found in the post. Methinks the troll doth like to B word and moan. CW
  8. And you wonder why people call you a Patsie-troll; if you learned how to read an entire thread before spouting off, you'd realize that I answered my own question nearly 20 minutes before you posted. CW
  9. Good link. I forgot that the Patriots traded for Dillon (and that the Eagles did the same with Owens). That explains a lot more. CW
  10. I predict a bye week! Hey, it's the Bills, it could happen CW
  11. Thank you for using the search feature; threads have been merged. Niagara Falls, NY here. Born across the street from Hyde Park, moved to Love Canal (yes, that Love Canal) until I was about 4, then when the place was condemned, we moved to the LaSalle area. CW
  12. Just a bump to remind people who may have been interested in doing this. I'll extend it for a couple of extra days. CW
  13. Right, but they got Dillon... That's a wash at the very least... I don't see why they get two picks is all. *shrug* CW
  14. Yes, but Thurman and Willis didn't get another injury in their first training camp... Two injuries isn't a pattern, but a third one in the next year or two will be. CW
  15. Actually yes, yes he can. If you recall, we did win 9 games last year. CW
  16. Nobody else concerned about this? CW
  17. How did New England get two picks? Who did they lose in free agency? I know they signed Dillon... If they're such a "team of nobody's who just win as a team," and then they sign a pro-bowl running back, I don't get how they receive two picks. And Philly gets three? What the hell, isn't Owens considered a good WR? I'd like to see how their process really works because it seems pretty arbitrary to me. CW
  18. Surprised nobody's posted this yet... http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/22/school.shooting/index.html That's two in Minnesota over the past few years - and none in the cities, only in the rural areas. CW
  19. No!!!! It's not true!!!! I'll never join you!!!! (jumps off ledge, plummeting to certain doom) CW
  20. That comment was from page 3, before I realized that we were only counting "Muslim people who hijack large airplanes and crash them into buildings" as our sole basis for who to watch out for terrorists. Try to keep up here, Darin. You're not living up to your reputation in these parts CW
  21. Then I'm more confused... My original message was: Then AD responds about TM? I don't get it... AD, care to elaborate? Again, Arabs have hijacked (as far as I know), four airplanes, all on ONE DAY. Remind me again how that correlates to "We better beware Arabs on planes!" because I just don't see it. Are you saying that had Reid, the shoebomber, succeeded in his plan, then we would get to be afraid of everyone on planes, but becasue he didn't, we should be on the lookout for muslims? That's stupid. http://images.google.com/images?q=shoebomb...lr=&sa=N&tab=wi As an aside, how did I get involved in TWO posts in the PPP forum in one day?! CW
  22. Well, one day of hijacking is what everyone else in this thread is using as their basis for "Arabs hijack airplanes and kill Americans!" That's an aberration as well, no? CW
  23. Hate to burst your bubble, but people do pay to be transported in Cessna's. My father-in-law's a pilot and flies both the 4-seat and 9-seat (?) Cessna's for people all the time. And I've been a passanger before. But at least we've established that "Only muslim terrorists who hijack large planes on or about 9/11 and crashed them into important buildings" count in this discussion. CW
  24. So this doesn't count, right? http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/01/05/tampa.crash/ You probably meant to say "all terrorists who hijacked LARGE Planes in the US and crashed them into buildings." CW
×
×
  • Create New...