Bungee Jumper

Anyone who considers Hilary Clinton or either or the remaining Bush brothers a viable candidate for 2008 should immediately be shot. We've had no one but Bushes and Clintons in the White House for 20 years. Those two families should be barred from any further elections, on the simple principle that we aren't a !@#$ing monarchy.

Generally, I think your a grade-A twit...but "Ann Coultergeist" is a pretty good one...

"Chance" is a colloquial term for a stastical principle. "Error" is a completely different principle...it's a function of the accuracy of your test, not the statistical distribution of your results. You would know this if you ever took a statistics class... This is what I mean when I say you can't speak the language. So far, you've proven you can't define "heritability", "variance", "chance", "error", "mean", "regression"... you just keep getting funnier and funnier...

Consistency is not a positive when you're as dead-nuts wrong as you are. He understands the relation between measurement error and regression toward the mean: THERE IS NONE. You don't understand the math, so you set up the simulation incorrectly, got bad data out of it, interpreted it incorrectly, and then brought out a whole bunch of links that you didn't understand to support your incorrect interpretation of bad data from your incorrect simulation. And the only reason I'm encouraging you is because it's !@#$ing hilarious, how completely deluded about wrong you are. We can't even explain it to you, because you can't even speak the language; you can't even define "mean" properly!

And that would decrease reliability somehow?

God help your kids.

Holy sh--. You're making Joey Balls look rational.

But it's so cool when eight year old girls cry...

It makes him feel better about himself...he has so little...

I'll email it to you. Every day.

That must be why Lee Evans' routes suck. Tough to cut when you're carrying your QB's torso...

We'd still have to read it, he just wouldn't have to type it each time. Good idea, actually...

So would Hannibal Lechter.

In that case...I commend you on a job well done.

There is also the idea I mentioned a couple years ago that, in a counter-insurgency campaign, more troops = more targets. One can hypothesize that reduced troop strengths could reduce the violence. Or one could, back when it was actually an insurgency and not sectarian religious violence. There's nothing inherently bad about reducing troop strength...it's the "because war is bad!" justification that so many pudding-heads use for it that I have problems with personally.

Quick, i'n't 'e?

Personally, I wouldn't feel bad. But personally, I'm not a very decent person. Either way, though...personally, I'd be polishing my resume, with the idea that no one in the organization is going to want to work with me anymore and my job was about to become far less enjoyable. What actually happened has absolutely nothing to do with how your coworkers are going to perceive it, sorry to say. That's just me, though. I gotta be me. You gotta be you.

http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showt...ndpost&p=830096 This might help. Retard.

Which makes perfect sense, to a Democratic party that's inherited the mantle of Clinton "foreign policy".

And instead of ignoring Congress like he has been, the administration will...ignore Congress.

Yeah. They're state-of-the-art early 70's technology. An IPod has far more memory and processing power than the shuttle. This is not surprising in the least.

For Republicans stabbing them in the back. Duh.

You try feeding a billion Chinamen without broiling the occasional border collie...

"We're a high-motor team."

I'm crushed. And here I was going to send you flowers.