Bungee Jumper

He's probably trying frantically right now to figure out how to spin that one interception and two sacks into an entire 60 minutes of bad QB play. I'm betting part of it will involve "But most of his receiving yardage was actually Lee Evans running after the catch...so really, he only threw for 100..." or something.

Spoken with the authority of first-hand experience only a Navy man could muster...

His mailbox? How 'bout his keyboard?

Thank you. Up by three, on the road, defense has given up 14 and can't stop the run, less than 2 minutes in the half, you have the ball and three time-outs... ...try to score? Nah, why bother. That pretty much sums up this team.

Doubt it. Can't see how you'd know I'd explain your reasoning is fallacious, and still hold the fallacy. "Belief" has nothing to do with it. Did he or didn't he? You're such a retard.

I vote you send a newsletter...but only if you Johnny Coli writes it for you.

I used to, until I found out he's black.

Considering it's a UC is a state university, it could be the same. Considering it's a California state university...I wouldn't bet on it.

All that demonstrates is that you don't have a clue what "science" actually is. Or a "theory". Except that "intelligent design" proponents usually rationalize it backwards: science says "Looking at the available evidence, here is a theory that best explains its meaning." Intelligent design says "Looking at the theory, here is how the available evidence can be explained." The intelligent design argument is nothing more than using the hypothesis to prove itself...and as such is not falsifiable, and as such is not science. Evolution, on the other hand, is hard, rigorous science. Read Darwin. Darwin didn't decide evolution was a valid theory - he developed it from evidence he collected contrary to his devout belief in God and personal belief in creationism. He did good science: he looked at the evidence, looked at the prevailing theory, said "this theory doesn't explain the evidence", and came up with a better one. Is a fallacy. Backwards reasoning again. "If the earth wasn't livable, we wouldn't be here. Therefore, since we're here, the earth must have been made livable for us." That doesn't "hint" at anything - you're using your hypothesis of determinism to prove your hypothesis of determinism. That's even less science that creationism usually is. Obviously because you don't understand The Big Bang. A "large bang" didn't "cause millions of stars". It's actually far more complex than that. I'd recommend not pursuing that line of discussion, frankly. You do, and I promise I'll own you. I've read it before, thanks. It's still crap. I dont' reject God. I talk with him on a daily basis, in fact. He asked me to tell you that he doesn't need people like you to pimp for him.

Uhhh...no, there isn't. Intelligent design isn't science. By definition. It's not falsifiable. I don't care if people believe in it or not...just don't pretend it's even remotely scientific.

Police? I thought these were campus rent-a-cops.

Michael. OJ's just a normal, average, everyday celebrity murderer. I wouldn't be afraid of being around him, because he's basically predictable. Michael Jackson, on the other hand, is just !@#$ing weird.

Stafford's already a good player. Which is pretty scary. Sucks losing Roy, though. Although I'd gladly put him and Afinogenov on IR if it meant Tallinder was back on the ice tonight.

I thought the common thread was that Losman sucks.

"Probably"? They lose money. Not as in "We're not turning a profit," but as in "We don't know what happened to it, we can't find it." But Mexicans snorting cocaine is a far greater budgetary crisis. Just ask Mike...

About the only one she knows how to play, too. No-talent hoofer.

They do, since Lucas changed it in the DVD release so that Han didn't shoot first. It's a contentious point...mostly because so many Star Wars fans are utter lunatics, but also because it changes the entire characterization of Han Solo from a self-serving rogue who agonizes over doing the right thing (at the end, as the deus ex machina in the Death Star trench), to someone who's actions are basically preordained, and thus removes a lot of the dramatic tension from the character and the movie. And shows what a piss-poor filmmaker Lucas is, that he couldn't even see that Han shooting first was actually a very important point of character development.

We were intelligently designed that way...

Agreed, completely.

RJ didn't play long enough for his production to start tailing off with age. His real age-adjusted QB rating is actually substantially lower. Hey, you're right! Making sh-- up is fun!

I'm sure Tallinder's and Lydman's absences have nothing to do with 3-4 goals a night, either. It's all the goalie's fault.

Actually, that is a republic. It's not a democracy. As opposed to ancient Athens, which was a true democracy but not a republic.

A "wrongful death" suit. Not a "right to life" charge. Basically, he was found personally responsible for the deaths in the civil suit, even though he wasn't criminally responsible according to the criminal case. Which doesn't make a whole lot of sense...but hey, welcome to the US legal system.

Oh, OJ was definitely framed. Which is what was so embarrassing: how incompetent is the LAPD for failing to frame a guilty man?