The Big Cat

And I'm sure you could set up a digital Fort Knox, and it won't do **** to prevent him from getting a hold of it the way a lot of us did: from that deviant lackey kid who's got it now on his phone, his tablet, his laptop and has all his bookmarks in the cloud so they can be accessed from anywhere. We had the friend with the cable box that kinda got good reception on the Spice channel. But there was only one box in his house: his parents room. Didn't stop us from lining up on his parents bed and talk our way through what were or weren't seeing.

Cue Han Solo.

That's gold! I'm also curious if posters here have sons of a certain age and how porous the blockade is between them and carnal knowledge nowadays. Lest we forget, it's A LOT easier to come by now AND while Chef might call nudey magazines from the 70's "porn," the Internet has a much MUCH different definition of "porn." Kinda blows the whole innocence thing right out of the water.

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah not sure what tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiime zone you're iiiiiiiiiiiiiin.....

http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/163179-adolescence-and-the-pursuit-of-boobies/

Did you type that right? Because I don't recall.

On the heels of this eye-opening exploartion, I'm bumping this over here because it came up in the trade deadline thread, and I know there's got to be some great anecdotes. With the access to the Internet afforded to today's young males, getting a glimpse at boobies just isn't the decathlon it used to be. I fear that when you take the effort out of it, so goes the enjoyment and satisfaction as well. I grew up a 90's kid, so obviously my experiences were much different than yours. But I vividly remember discovering my dad's collection of late 70's early 80's Playboys when I was 10. The older neighborhood kids soon took a fond interest in hanging out in our basement. Likewise, I can remember on at least one occasion having several friends over, splaying those babies out over the basement carpet and going through them one by one. Each week the newspaper had a TV guide insert magazine and each week I'd flip to the back to comb through which upcoming HBO content contained "nudity" and/or "strong sexual content." If something appeared, I'd make a mental note of it. If there was weekend programming before or around 10 pm: JACKPOT. I can't tell you how many LOUSY cop drama/thrillers from the 80's/90's I've watched JUST to catch a peek at a boob or two. What about you guys? I'd venture to guess none of us grew up with the Internet--how'd you manage YOUR fix?

standby, gents

Very informative, but I wasn't even referring to firing mechanics as much as whipping the rifle around willy nilly, with seemingly no regard for whether or not it was pointed directly in their face; picking it up by the barrel (as you mentioned); letting the damn thing just flail around the floor; yadda yadda.

*less hot Obviously she spent a little more time on makeup/smile practice before school picture day.

Guilty as well. In a single split second, my mind was REELING!

Yeah I dont' know much (nothing at all) about guns, but the way A LOT of those guys were just winging that thing around didn't look right to me. Presumably they only had the single shot loaded up?

Jay Ross and your one KR for 7 yards...we hardly knew ye.

it's like being 13 years old and watching Silk Stalkings on USA, clinging to the hope that THIS time you'll see some boobies.

camping on the NFL trade deadline waiting for something interesting to happen is like watching a paranormal investigation show expecting to see definitive evidence of ghosts

Greatest day in the life of the camera man.

Marrone said in his press conference that the coverage was designed for Hughes.

Woods will return once EJ's back. Thad has proven himself incapable of making more than 1.5 reads on any given play.

I guess I hadn't realized the season ended after 8 games this year. I guess I also hadn't realized there has been zero improvement this year, in any aspect of the game.

With Rookie's at QB, HC, OC and MLB, did you seriously expect that change to happen this year?

How come you left out yards per carry (3.9 in 2013 vs 5.0 in 2012)? Or the fact that we had (through seven weeks) the same number interceptions we had all of last year? What about sacks? 36 in 16 weeks vs. 27 in 8. How do those things look on paper?

Oh, you're citing total yards as a viable statistic? My heavens.

Lost in all this flim flam time of possession this, it's the offense's fault that, I think we're all seriously overlooking the CRIPPLING third down penalties we've committed...REPEATEDLY...often allowing eventual touchdowns. Happened twice Sunday. Happened against Carolina. Happens all the time, it seems.

Marrone's running the subs now? Pretty sure that's the quality control guys, who I'm sure got a talking-to from Dougie.