Jump to content

mannc

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mannc

  1. 3 hours ago, Bob in STL said:

    It’s most important that they win today.   A must win division win is a step forward then.  Losing shows no growth.  If they win and still get eliminated I will feel better about it.  

    If they aren’t getting in anyway, I’d prefer the Bills lose.  It would probably move them up in the draft signicantly.

  2. 1 hour ago, MAJBobby said:

    I would venture to say spending 60M guaranteed of the owners Money on a UFA and that UFA not living up or busting runs more of a risk to the GM, coaches and Team. 

    Even if you’re right about that (and I don’t think you are), the chances of Cousins (a guy who has put up three straight years of borderline elite passing numbers) busting is much lower than for any of these rookies.

  3. 42 minutes ago, TigerJ said:

    I don't think the bowl game drops his draft status.  I think NFL talent evaluators figured out that no QB behind that offensive line was going to look very good versus Ohio State.

    Yes, poor old USC: always starved for talent. The excuses for this guy just never end.

  4. 1 hour ago, H2o said:

    Darnold needs to return to USC for another year. Whether he does that or not we will see. The lure of being a top 10 pick and money grabs hold of many of these kids. He's not ready. 

    Returning to school will do nothing more than delay the inevitable bust for one more year.   He’s not good, and another year at SC isn’t going to change that.  The emperor is stark naked.

  5. 2 hours ago, Sky Diver said:

    In this weather, when they were taking chances on 4th down all day? Who made that ridiculous call?

    Weather doesn’t matter.  It was an awful decision—firing offense, actually, especially vs the Pats.  Absolutely disgraceful surrender.

    1 hour ago, KelsaysLunchbox said:

    Hindsight. It's a wonderful thing.

    Hindsight has nothing to do with it.  It was a disgraceful call before and after the kick.

  6. 2 minutes ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

     

    What ESPN reported is that the Packers violated the IR rule per other teams and those other teams were calling for him to be released.  That's a lot different than what you inferred. 

    And it’s also a lot different than “not going to happen”.  Seems like a clear violation by Pack of a rule, the consequence of which is that the player gets released.  So why is it “not gonna happen”?

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...