Andy1

The reality is… is that Trump is a frail old man with health issues, as is expected for someone his age. Grandpa needs his rest now.

Yea, the 25 age would never be ruled constitutional, but it would be effective. Before everyone spent their time behind screens, we used to go out to clubs, drink and hang out as young men. We went places and did activities with our peers. That is also what seems to be missing from many young men as they brew their hatred of others in isolation or with toxic crap on the internet. Remember the anti smoking public education campaigns years ago. I think they were largely successful in changing public behavior. I would support something like that with guns. Of course the gun lobby would stop it but I can dream…. Personally, I think far too many people buy guns without fully understanding and accepting the supreme responsibility that is assumed with that purchase. The gun is sitting in the house, waiting forever to do its job. People buy it, practice with it a bit, forget about it, get tired of it, maybe their feeling of being in danger is gone, maybe their mental health status changes, maybe their kid now becomes a young distraught man, maybe they just get old and die and the gun still sits there, waiting to be used. Guns last longer than the people who purchase them, thus they are everywhere. Safe storage laws, prosecutions of negligent parents, PR persuasion campaigns to turn them in or discourage their purchase, liability insurance requirements (probably unconstitutional, but I think would be effective). It’s a wicked problem and one without easy answers but to do nothing is also not an answer.

In a dream world - Better more thorough background checks. Longer waiting cool down periods. Mandatory background checks for private sales and gun shows. Ban sales to people with history of any violence or animal abuse. Red flag laws enforced. Restricted sales to men under the age of 25. Young screwed up men are nearly the entire problem. Another effective solution may be strategies to reduce isolation in society which promote relationship building for young men. Im not saying it would be a panacea, but I think it would help…. Not that I expect any of the legal stuff to happen given the court and politics, thus the sacrifice of lives must continue. On a positive note, I read that mass shootings are declining compared to years ago, so maybe we are over the hump or it could just be declining demographics of young men.

Thank God we have the unhindered right to get whatever gun we want. It’s obviously helping to keep us safe. Now if we can only convince our priests to carry. Then maybe we will be safe in church. Until then, the sacrifice must continue.

I don’t hear anyone talking about this. I guess it’s part of the amazing winning deal Trump made with China. A couple months ago, we were taking the student visas away. Now Trump is flipping and opening the door to educate Chinese students so they can take their knowledge back to China. The previous peak for Chinese students here was in 2019-2020 at 372,000. In 2023-24, there were 277,000 getting educated here. What do you all think of it?

So the guy with no medical degree but who has a brain worm is walking around, looking at kids and diagnosing them with “mitochondrial challenges”. That’s where our agency to protect public health is at. Who wants their doctor to listen to this quack?

Sounds like two babbling idiots talking about nothing. Distraction material. Let’s see what September brings.

The only ideology these monsters have is hate with mental illness and access to guns. Thank God we have our 2nd Amendment rights. It has to be this way and nothing will change forever and ever…

The headline say it all. Trump has gone full circle into Mamdani land.

While I’m not tuned into right wing media, I get that perspective here. If there is so much outrage over Trumps policy, I haven’t seen it expressed here on PPP. So what do you think about government taking ownership of businesses?

Looks like socialist Bernie agrees with Trump on owning a share of Intel. This is the world we are in and apparently all the MAGA has no problem with it. I guess Trump is bringing some Bernie into his policy. Bizarro world! https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senator-sanders-favors-trump-plan-take-stake-intel-other-chipmakers-2025-08-20/

Well it didn’t take long. Let’s go to court and find out. It seems to me that burning flags is just about an American tradition of protest speech. Though I wouldn’t be surprised if this SC would agree that money in campaigns is speech but flag burning isn’t. This guy below certainly isn’t inciting a riot, unlike J6.

Interesting comparison. I can understand why the gov bought shares of the failing struggling GM to keep it afloat. So why does Trump want a share of chip companies? Are they struggling like GM? Make it make sense to me.

I tried selling my Trump pearls, but the jewelry store said they were worthless. And in 2.5 years republicans will be screaming about how communist the Dem presidential candidates are. Personally, I think we have a more of a corporate government….government by and for corporations.