Chilly

Do you really think you'd sleep better in a "Federal Pound-me-in-the-ass Prison"? What, are you gay?

If I die, tell my wife, hello.

I'd think that naming yourself after an old processor would be proof enough of being a troll, lol

Sureeeeee..... http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?s=&am...st&p=703221 Hey now, you're the one that brought up boners in the end of the world scenario, not me. (A bit sensitive regarding me joking about it being mentioned it for an end of the world scenario, no?) I'm thinkin I should up the ante: make some propoganda posters and what not. Any ideas?

Its complete bull sh-- - it will only last them as long as it is politically advantageous for them to do so.

Ni mama shi ya

Everyday - my job is in the building right next to the Boner, er tower.

lol. "Blame the MLB, not the players who chose to use them, and the league that allows them" Did you get that one from Hillary?

Damn man, you're obsessed with boners.

Why do you think CNN created the ADD summary?

heh, that would require them to be honest with themselves first

lol

lol "hundreds"

Grats Lew. Yeah, but you would have had that wine anyway.

Yes, but lots of times candidates know what sort of messages are positively or negatively affecting an area before they get their (from seeing what reaction they get from speeches, ads, etc). Of course, a lot of this is done via focus groups as well and not necessarily polling, but they are pretty similar. Yep - which gives the campaign (some) time to react to information that they find out.

I kind of think she's delusional enough to believe that her getting in the White House would have that effect.

Which is why I said these general election polls are almost worthless - they provide no data on specific areas. Both candidates will be focusing on certain states (like MO, OH, MI, etc) from now until the election. Undoubtedly, both will alter their messages based upon the feedback they are receiving from polls. Few points: A.) 6 months is plenty of time to change messaging on materials/handouts based upon what they find is working. I doubt each candidate will only have one direct mailer and nothing else. B.) Television media has some of the largest impact available, and a lot of the content going to the press can be changed on a daily basis (outside of TV ads, of course). C.) If they agree to weekly debates (like what has been proposed), there is no doubt that their messages will change quickly (even if its only in subtle ways). D.) They will be using the basis of what works and what doesn't work when they change their message to determine what to put on the more static direct mailers. So, yes, polls are extremely important, and impact every aspect of the campaign over the next 6 months.

Wrong. Current polling will help define and evolve campaign strategy. The *general election* polls of one candidate vs another don't really mean all that much.

Can you bump your own thread any more? Christ. 5 posts in a row.

The DNC is betting that their significant lead in congressional races will allow them to try to boost the popularity of their presidential candidate, and to take up his message more, with such a strategy. In addition, the DNC already has a huge head start over the RNC this year - at this point, they can afford to take less money as they have that significant gap - and create lots of good will to convince people that they really are changing. If in 8 years this policy will still be in effect, then I'll be impressed.

Yeah, because those polls matter just so, so much.

Belichick ordered a hit, eh

lol. From: http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/sha...tball_riva.html

True, its likely that doing so would just screw it up more; however, Bush could be gambling that somewhere along the line, if we kept troops and major operations there, someone would want to fix said country, and he would get credit for putting that into motion. lol

Ended up grabbing some on ebay before the prices jumped way up.