Chilly

Since when is sections and rows that are being removed from the stadium, that still have season ticket holders, a minute detail?

You've been able to control+click to get right-click functionality for years and years, and if you plugged in a 2 button mouse it'd work just fine. BTW, Apple even makes 2-button mice now. They have for about 5 years.

I found this sequence of events pretty interesting: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/...eze-out-wwl-tv/ Here's the link that caused the Saints to "Freeze out" their local CBS affiliate: http://www.wwltv.com/news/local/E-mail-exc...n-89963922.html Neither the Saints nor the TV station can afford to lose each other. So, who blinks first?

Sorry, but Reggie Bush did not have much to do with the Saints becoming a good team.

It does. iTunes on a Mac is a pretty integrated experience that doesn't feel or seem near as bloated. I personally find the interface clunky, but that's a personal taste of mine - I can understand why some people like it, I just don't prefer it.

iTunes is bloated and clunky. Anyway, I don't get the iPad. I really don't have a need for an oversized phone - I already have a phone! It's also not a Netbook replacement. A solid Netbook is better at browsing the web (1024x768? Bleck), just as good of a media player, and has way more features built in. I just don't get what it's market is. It doesn't browse the web as well as a Netbook, it doesn't do email as well as a Netbook (clients like Thunderbird 3 blow mail.app out of the water), and it doesn't play media as well as a Netbook (Flash anyone?). It's supposed to be a Netbook replacement, but it costs more than a typical Netbook and you get way less. I don't really see the appeal of that. Now, if they had given this thing a slideout keyboard, a netbook remix of Mac OS X (so you could actually get full functionality from it, with a better UI instead), and a better screen resolution, I could absolutely see the value in it. But they didn't.

And the team that has Campbell still wanted McNabb. That should say something.

Those commas instead of periods are definitely reassuring.

I hated that level in L4D

Yeah you can. Just look into the "stats"

It's on you to back up your own claim.

I'm so paranoid, we filled out our census form completely and sent it back in! Try again. Yeah I did, thanks for playing. Which are two completely different things for two completely different reasons. People are questioning what the government is going to do with the information in the census, which is legitimate questioning. Does this mean you shouldn't fill it out? No, but I'm not surprised you can't see the difference. For more info about why people are skeptical, click here: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/03/25/132...ivate?art_pos=1 And, like I said, there is no civic duty higher than government skepticism. Now, let's compare that to jury duty. People don't like doing that because it's an inconvenience. In that instance, your point about civic duty is valid. Really? Or is the complaining just more apparent to you because you now communicate with people using the internet that you wouldn't have known/hung out with in real life? BTW, this country was built upon skepticism and questioning. Which is an extremely simple way of viewing them both.

I voted for everything but Mallet just to throw the results off.

This post is quite hilarious. You're bashing someone because they gave an opinion, and then your proof is a "stat" that is, and I quote from the site: "The cumulative PFF.com rating of the player's pass blocking only". And when you look at what makes up that rating, here it is: Yeah, really scientific, irrefutable stat right there.

Rick Barnes.

When I went to the home opener last year, I made my yearly stop at Junction. I thought the pizza was pretty bad - the quality went way down.

I have no idea why you're talking about jury duty here, but I can tell you that questioning what the government is going to do with the additional information is a GOOD thing.

Should someone that has proven they can't adhere to the laws society has deemed most important be allowed to play a part in making them? I have no idea, tbh.

There's nothing more civic in American culture than skepticism of the government.

As usual, Lori's right on the mark. I thought that story would interest everyone (I enjoyed it), with that particular quote being the part that sparked discussion. I was also curious to see how much that divided the fanbase. I was actually expecting a much more negative response than what I've seen so far. I, personally, have had no problem with how FA has gone so far. I'm not a huge fan of the Green signing (I liked some of the other FA linemen better, including Wade Smith), and would have liked to see what Chan would have done with TO, but I'm a big fan of the Edwards and Davis signings. You made a straw man by assuming I was trying to imply something I wasn't.

I've got to imagine you wouldn't want to do that, cause the chance of the other team scoring a TD goes way up.

You want to talk about stupid posts? Please show me where, in my original post, I criticized Nix's strategy of not signing anyone at midnight. I have no clue where you got all this crap from.

I was being sarcastic. Last time I went there, it had Soprano.

The Buffalo Bills' official message board seems to have the most intelligent discussions.

Aren't foxes nocturnal?