leh-nerd skin-erd

You didn’t “do”anything. They told you who your guy would be, and in spite of obvious signs you should have demanded someone else, you stayed in line without a whisper. When they told you to move to another line and pay no attention to the first line, you dutifully complied. When they told you this is the way nominees are selected in the new world order, you figured it was your idea. As for the “right thing”, inflation has surged, price gouging on the B/H watch is a major problem per KH, personal bankruptcy filings are up 16% after a 16% increase last year. More people died from COVID on the Harris watch and that was after the Trump admin delivered the vaccine. The border continues to be a mess, parts of NYC and other major cities in free fall, and under Harris/Biden’s watch, millions are dead, injured, homeless in Ukraine and Israel. Our faith in our leaders to follow simple and basic security for national secrets has been rocked, with thinking people recognizing the nature of selective political prosecution.

Perhaps, but the collective belief in the JBs physical/cognitive/emotional state will go down as one of the great examples of mass delusion in the history of American politics. You d$psh$ts were mortgaging the house on a political shell game, thinking “…they said it’s just a stutter….just a stutter…”.

We know this for sure —it would be a real resume booster for you if he was a Democrat. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/04/joe-biden-allegations-physical-behavior-women

That’s what THEY want you to think, Frank! Follow the signs to the true north.

And the dead body in his office!

It sounds like you, tbh.

In related news, CNN is reporting that the DOJ has opened an investigation into Tulsi's involvement of the Hawai'i Earthquake of 2006.

@Tiberius...why would KamHar decline a Q&A with Bloomberg? Fear?

At the table of brotherhood, no one is an idiot, no one deflects, and all opinions are welcome. If someone else saw tears, then tears they saw. I only heard sniffling, but it is allergy season. It's also important to know that Roundy may be a bit frosty because Trump appeared at a drive-thru, and Roundy is all about a world where walkability is the way.

After 4 years of JB being handled, guided, moved, directed about (and stumbling, tripping and falling when he wasn’t), it’s ironic you call a simple political appearance a puppet show.

I see it differently. Your base didn’t like her in the least just 4 years ago….she got the initial bump because Biden was steamrolled so badly in the debate. As time settled, she reverted to the same unlikable politician she was before.

The impact of a thousand paper cuts can make a difference, Frank.

Whiny Fergie: “Ad hominem attacks!” 🙄 Hypocritical Fergie: “My attacks don’t count!”🤫 Confused Fergie: “Smart people trust but verify, except when they don’t!”🧐 Ad hominem Fergie: “Your response is long-winded”🙄 Change the subject because he’s been outted as whiny, hypocritical, confused and Ad hominem Fergie: “I don’t really care one way or the other, I’m just worried about the living wage for the people at my golf club…”👌🏼

Ah, I’ve upset you. That wasn’t my intent, and what you perceive as an attack or insult was neither. I simply pointed out the parallels between your positioning, the interaction we see here, and the larger issue of Trump/Harris/McD. If you feel it’s uncivil to point out that posters here (you included) regularly question the credibility and bona fides of other posters, you should refrain from questioning the credibility and bona fides of other posters. I don’t doubt you worked at a Holiday Inn, and agree it’s irrelevant whether I believe you or not. My first job was working on a cleaning crew and while I can’t tell you much about dried egg yokes, I can tell you that cleaning bathrooms and resolving issues that arise from improper disposal of hygiene products (wet, dry or in-between) brings challenges as well. Your thoughts on Trump’s appearance at the McDonalds may/may not impact voters, and I already addressed that. With regard to all you smartums out there, you just typed a couple comments about the inability for Harris to offer proof of her work experience, going so far as to offer thoughts on your experience. Yet, you suggest the smartums follow the “trust but verify” process. Regular folk like me simply point out the disconnect there, and remind you that in this case, you’re simply trusting, and not verifying whatsoever. Still, it’s interesting that the simple act of a political candidate connecting with a local business that serves everyday Americans has created such a fuss. Maybe we all need to step back, take a deep breath and swing by the local McD’s for a McFlurry.

You’re not running for President, so your experience is not relevant. At the same time, our little social experiment here likely reveals that some posters might not necessarily believe you. There’s been a lot of back and forth between you and other posters about credibility, education, occupation etc that is perpetually unresolved. In that regard, it’s not unlike the issue Harris faces with McDonalds, Trump faces with his statements, and even JB faced with his statement that his uncle was consumed by cannibals. You trust her. Others don’t.

No, Scraps, it’s not a criminal trial, it’s the court of public opinion. She doesn’t need evidence, she needs to convince voters who care about such things that she’s telling the truth. You don’t care because you’re Krazy4Kamala, great. We’ll add it to the list of things folks in your camp don’t care about. As for her, she doesn’t have to do anything. Maybe the issue goes away, maybe it doesn’t. However if it chips away at her support with undecided voters, that she seems to be pandering, it’s a win for Trump. As for what she can say or do, she could provide a timeframe when she worked there, the location of the restaurant, perhaps a name or two of the people she worked with or a supervisor. The problem there, of course, is that people can check those things these days with amazing accuracy. Look what happened to her running mate, Tiananmen Tim. Claimed he was in China during the uprising (Wow, how about that!), turns out he was actually at Big China Buffet in Eden Prairie, Minnesota (Wait, that’s not the same thing!) and just got his wires crossed a bit.

Everybody loves something, 4th, and love is love. Let it go! She’s a politician and people have every reason to doubt her. It’s her claim, she should be able to handle something as basic as this.

Trump’s McD event has awoken a sleeping giant! @Gene Frenkle is looking into unconfirmed reports that campaign ads are not, in fact, spontaneously created content by well-intentioned passers-by. Stay tuned—this story could break at any time!

Will Smith says “ YOU KEEP ARNOLD PALMERS DICK OUT YER MOUTH!”.

Kudos to you for recognizing that you supported a candidate whose mind was gone. I’m not sure why you did that, but you did. Why do you trust people who told you that Biden’s mind was sharp and he was presidential, when by your own account his mind was “gone”? Sounds to me like you are easily manipulated and a bit of a dum dum.

It’s true, Frenx. As we speak, 60 Minutes is preparing an EXPOSE and I can confirm DJT did NOT, in fact, apply online or in-person for that job. It’s an October Surpfries!

You’re reinventing history, Tibs. By most accounts, Harris outperformed Trump in his second debate (her first). Of course, Trump performed so well in his first debate (she was not present of course), he forced Biden to drop out of the race. This was something Biden said he’d not do—word of a Biden, of course, and next thing you know he’s off to Delaware. Trump changed the course of history. I think most voters see that as a wash, and based on how tight the race seems to be, a 3rd debate for Trump, 2nd debate for Harris is a non-issue. As Frankish says…no one cares.

I respect your right to your opinion, in spite of the fact that Trump has done more debates than Harris.

Had the dems been a bit more respect for their own process, the first candidate would have debated twice, or the new, different second candidate would have debated the first and second time. Either way, DJT debated twice. That’s plenty.

I think the word you're looking for is "trueindernationaldiprezzim". If not, it certainly sounds like it should be.