leh-nerd skin-erd

Really? None if what follows is directed at you: $#@@ off. $%&*sucker. M#$@@f÷÷*r. Eat %$##. Screw you. Go to hell. Damn liar. The story is he lost his cool over something as basic as a second amendment question. He was overly aggressive, attempted to intimidate the guy with language, hand gestures, and attitude and actually told him they should go outside. All these things are true and if you disagree with me you are a %$#@ing %$#@ dog-faced %$#@ red dog $#@@ pony soldier.

@Bob in Mich wondering how you square this up? It may well be the first lie in the history of the modern dem party but it seems like a biggie.

Putin puppet, racist, misogynist, abuser, fat guy, orange dude, sexual predator, tax evader. Biden has been treated as a joke for much of his political career because he is a dimwit. Says stupid things. Makes racist comments. Wandering Hands. And so on. It's politics.

https://youtu.be/o9WHJB9wqdk

@transplantbillsfan this represents a good and decent man engaging in debate on what of the hottest issues of our time? He deserves no respect whatsoever for this outburst, for speaking condescendingly to his female associate, for butchering the model of the firearm that everyone else in America seems to know, and for his generally douchey behavior. Interestingly, he also made a gun motion with his hand and repeatedly thrust it at the man. Hysterical that they would send an elementary school student home for that but Joey GoopEye can do it and it earns him respect.

Excellent summary. Today is a good day. I understood the initial question, then I realized the question wasn't so much a question as speculation about something that may/may not come to pass, then I inquired about that and you changed it up to an accusation that i was a Russian sympathizer because the speculated non-existent bailout hadn't occurred and I wasn't sure if I would/would not support it if it did. I followed along pretty well until I didn't.

I think just “Mod” is even more chilling, makes you sound like the kindly neighbor down the road. Could be just my imagination but I fear I’ve said too much, especially in light of the question posed, and answered. Apologies.

Well..one little wrinkle on that. Trump and his children are successful outside of government, while in the case of Hunter Biden, it’s 100%, full tilt, no questions asked the power of government enriching him beyond belief. The problem is that in theory, government should be the watchdog for this sort of tomfoolery, when in fact, it’s the first thing on the dopey kid’s resume. It’s so firmly entrenched in the system that Joe Biden bragged about resolving what would obviously be a major conflict of interest. He wasn’t concerned because frankly, there was nothing to be concerned about...until Trump.

I’ve never told anyone this, but my real name is Judge Wopner The Junior, son of famed television Judge Wapner. I inherited the old man’s love of the law and fair play. I’d be on TV myself if it weren’t for that whor....no, I won’t say it...that Judge Judy who road my father’s coattails like a French cyclist drafting Lance Armstrong in the Tour De France. Anyway, I read the interaction, and it went like this: PFF says JA sucks Minshew rules blah blah blah; Lots of us say blah blah no way; Two guys say Minshew is an absolute dream boat blah blah blah; One guy says the other posters are super sensitive about JA blah blah blah; Both groups then say no man it’s you no man it’s you blah blah blah; I have a pretty good handle on what’s going on so I’m going to rule here: The Minshew guys should be banned from the board, it’s the only way to be fair to all, and by fair to all I mean me. . I call on you as global moderator to burn the heretics, figuratively speaking of course. (It’s kind of chilling to type out “Global Moderator”, very “Matrix” or at least “Enemy of the State” with a young Will Smith and America’s best actor Gene Hackman)

Honestly, it's tough to follow you when you want to make a point. I try, I really do, but you cycle in and out of reality and I'm not sure when you're lucid and when you're normal. I might support a bail out, I might not support a bail out. I figure you probably supported Obama era corporate bail outs, I understood the need in some cases to offer TARP money. Now you have an issue without even knowing what you're objecting to? I'm going to offer you some unsolicited advice---you can put your pants on before your underwear, there is no law against it, but generally speaking you look pretty silly when you do it. Wait until Trump, or if you have your way, Bernie bails them out, before you get all worked up. Plenty of time for Bernie to lead you and yours to the promised land. Look for the neon sign that says "PAYDAY LOANS".

I'm in the fading sunlight of the decade known as "the fifties". I wanted the young kids to think I was still hip and cool. I failed.

I was unfazed by your outburst and forgive you for it. I am all for discussing topics and speculating accordingly. However, I feel it's incumbent on the original poster to set the table. When you inquired about Trump bailing out the airlines, being a person of good faith, I assumed you had some knowledge or inclination that someone named "Trump" was proposing a bailout of a sector of the economy, in this case, the airline industry. With respect to President Trump hypothetically offering assistance to the airline industry, I may or may not support such a plan. I would factor in the details of the plan, the impact on airlines and employees thereof, the cost to the taxpayer, and whether or not the decision impacted my travel plans. Good talk.

Oh, speculating. That seems productive. On that note: How did you like that movie that comes out next year, is Josh Allen a first ballot HOFer, and wow, flying cars. Whodathunkit?

In what context Tibsy Obiden? I haven't seen the outline of a bailout, have you?

It's a pathetic thing to see, a guy (presumably) waits for something he perceives as injurious to someone he disagrees with, rushes in to post and quickly bails like a thief in the night. For whatever reason, I respect those that come to engage even in spite of the occasional dunderheadedness of their commentary. That'd be your Tibsrantosaurus Rex, Gary B word, Bob Flanderson from Mich and the like. @Kemp = sad Tibsy supporting bailing out the wealthy! Have you no shame sir?

Wrap that rascal. Wait, what? Quick question...why no cruise ships? The potential for quarantine or germs in general?

Yes, of course, we're everywhere. I overheard you talking as you left the first run screening of "Mulan", you also said you thought the movie disrespectful to women as Mulan had no strong octogenarian caucasian male to comfort her, eand there was no homage at all to the famous American politician Drops From Race. I didn't follow the second part, but you seemed troubled. We'll get through this!

Jesus you must be a crazy bunch to hang up with. Transplant Buddy: I met a girl last night, we got together and it was awesome! Transplant: Is she of the faith? Transplant Buddy: What?! She was hot! Transplant: Hot for Jesus? Was she hot for Jesus, and did you confirm acceptance for hand-holding aka first base and a peck on the cheek aka second base? Transplant Buddy: I don't think you understand the bases. She was wild. Transplant: Wild? Like wild for education? Was she into physics or theology? That's so cool, when a woman is HFE (hot for education)? Transplant Buddy: I'm voting for Trump. Life is way easier over there. ××××× Biden is the deviant here based on your standards TBF. Let men and women be men and women.

Per Transplant, completely understandable kind older man providing comfort to a lady so young she likely didn't know she needed it. He's actually the hero here. The bald dude is emotional unavailable and distant in her time of need. ?

Yes, there is a difference between consenual physical contact in the Trump scenario, and ***** Joe pawing at a woman who prefers not to be pawed at. That doesn't change because you think it's acceptable, it isn't about you. That said, you're the guy who defines consensual physical contact as "sexual assault". Surely, she must have wanted it, is that what you people say? Classic enabler. Its why Joe gets away with it. .

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/biden-responds-to-allegation-of-unwanted-touching-kissing-not-once--never--did-i-believe-i-acted-inappropriately/2019/03/31/6b62e67c-53b8-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html You actually support the “good guy” who thinks the problem is that the women he assaulted with unwanted “hugs, expressions of support and comfort” didn’t understand that he thought it ok to do what he did. I think he thinks if they just understood he is Joe Biden, Good Guy, they would probably want more physical attention, not less. Most people are guilty of hypocrisy from time to time. All the raging about the puritanical roots of the USA aside, this seems to be a blind spot for you. @Buffalo_Gal said it much better than I ever could, and certainly reflects the opinions of most women I have spoken to on the issue that so offends you on Trump, but makes JB a #goodguy4life. Btw, one of my friends is a self-avowed liberal revolutionary. When she tossed that at me one day, I replied as BG outlined above, she smiled, shook her head and surrendered the narrative. She still thinks I’m crazy, she simply was uninterested in that particular point.

Plastic bottles proudly on display as these nitwits discuss climate change. Damn these people are funny.

As to the bolded, you’re simply, officially, irrefutably wrong. Whether it makes you feel better to summon righteous indignation at the comment made, I cannot say, but what he said neither reflects a claim of wrongdoing nor an admission of guilt. It simply reflects the experiences of Trump,and I’d gather many, many thousands of wealthy men—politicians, rock stars, athletes movie stars, a movie mogul or two, and though I cannot attest to this personally, probably more than a fair share of men who happen to be substantially better looking than the rest. For all I know, you might be one, though you’re probably blowing the gift God himself bestowed on you by walking around talking about your feelings sporting a man-bun and wearing a faded poncho made of organic hemp and broken down sandals covering feet caked in dirt after attending the most recent Phish concert. Where was I? Again, I never underestimate the enemy, and I agree that the scores of disciples of Obama still worship at what he refers to as the “Altar of How Great I Art”. I already outlined the voting habits of folks as I see them, and have no doubt many Obamaniacs would gladly go back in time to a colorless world of despair where we were constantly told things could not be accomplished, that it was too hard, too tough, that we all had to prepare for the USA to take its rightful place in the middle of the pack, and sit idly by while our $$$$ went global, where terrorist nations get the benjamins and the American tax payer got the bill for it. I know the common sentiment is that Barry proclaimed that it would take a full 10 years and 4 months for his recovery to begin, but you’ve been duped sir. Barry O tossed a salad for Clinton. Question, how did that go? How well did the anointing by The One work in 2016? Her biggest issue was she fall down/go boom, and she coughed a lot. That’s not Biden’s issue, his is that when he falls down, he gets up talking about a conversation he had with long dead leaders of China. When he coughs, he blows out his retina. As for 2016 pro-Trump voters fleeing to vote for Soft Hands Joe, sure, I’m sure that you believe that’s a thing. It is perfectly logical that folks who voted for a less tyrannical govt, freedom to keep more of the money they earn, a sense of optimism for the country, sensible border security, a return to conservative control of the SC and lower level courts, who watched the Russian experiment fail while gumming up 3/4 of his admin, the attempted Kavanaugh character assasination and all the like are running alongside you to vote for a twice-trounced candidate who frequently tries to butter his toast with the car keys, which, btw he thinks are to his 1957 Chevy. Your people can win, of course they can. But the game hasn’t even started for Joe, and he looks baaaaaad.

I never underestimate the ability of some people to vote as follows: 1. They will vote for a candidate/platform that confiscates assets from the middle class and beyond because the rewards to them are sustaintial. Since they can be given ×××, there is no need to work to earn xxx because it can be taken from another person. 2. They will vote for as much free $#!# as possible; 3. They will vote against their own best interests due to failure to recognize the ramifications of their actions, out of some perverse self-loathing or guilt about their own station in life. 4. They will pursue a platform that appeals to them on some level of righteousness while failing to acknowledge the incredible hypocrisy of their vote given their own lifestyle choices; As a result, I believe it is entirely possible that voters will come out to vote against Trump as you have indicated. That said, Biden and Sanders have been battling back and forth in what is akin to towel snapping each other in the hs after 10th grade gym class. The game changes when the nominee is chosen, and we move to the death match phase. Despite your protestations, Joe Biden is lugging around a whole bowl of cream o' wheat in the cavity that used to hold brain matter. He stutters, falters, loses his place, forgets where he is, mutters things like "dog faced pony soldier" and often speaks like a British lefttenant lobbing insults at the Gerrys up the hill in WW2. This is all occurring during what amounts to the warm up for the event that follows, and that event is a 50 mile race through the desert on a tricycle. I don't criticize these people for miscues regardless of party, but Joe appears ravaged by the effects of aging and it seems to get worse by the week. Sanders...well, the people lost their collective minds over things like Trump's "grab em" and the whispers of innuendo that Trump was a Russian operative, but that will pale in comparison to Sanders=Russia=Venezula=Cuba and literally IS a komrade from the old country and has been for decades. With luck, the Durham report comes out and a few Obama and Biden cronies heads roll, but if not, Trump will push forward anyways. I'm always cautious, had planned for a Cankles presidency and simply feel that when the ***** hits the fan for 2020, it'll be a scorched earth election. To be honest, it is. I see no moderate dem candidates in the race, and to be fair, if you consider yourself a moderate while opting to vote for Sanders if it plays out that way....no middle ground exists to be found anyway.

I saw the clip, he actually mentioned how wealthy he is, and why he then spends his own money for protection, like in some way he should be praised for it. Was it a deep fake? As for the point on being famous...I don't follow your point. Should celebrities be granted special rights as they relate to firearms that regular working folks do not?