leh-nerd skin-erd

I wouldn’t say you’re being harsh, but you’re being dickish, dick-like, of and pertaining to dickism. It doesn’t make you a bad person, just kind of a dick in this case.

Interesting. What aspects of the Russia investigation were particularly abhorrent to you? You indicated “many”, but just indulge me and hit me with two or three.

I support the process, I always did. As an analogy, I support law enforcement and our system of justice, but I do not support malicious prosecution. I’m just surprised at what you seem to be comfortable with politically as it relates to what you referred to as puppet dictatorships. Where does the “sham” impeachment of a President fall on your scale?

There you go! Nice! Russia investigation, sham! Surveillance of presidential candidates/weaponization of Intelligence, bad! Impeachment grift, sham! How come we only get to puppet dictator status when the courts are involved?

This time of year I’m barely willing to get out of my car to pump own gas.

I acknowledge your admiration, and appreciate your candor.

To quote Barrack from the block: "Nah nah nah ho-ho-hold on a second!'. How does this relate to your part time work as Hall Monitor and/or Life Coach du Jour on this thread? Anyway, because I like you, I'll answer. In order; 1. Yes; 2. Yes; 3. Yes; 4. Yes;

Again, bullsh^t, but carry on soldier.

That's hogwash. Complete poppycock. When faced with being steamrolled by an adversary with unlimited resources and the power to crush you and anyone around you love, decisions have to be made. When the government case unravelled--as it did, it was certainly possible for even the most well-intentioned judge to follow the recommendations of the justice department.

You have to give him credit, Judge Sullivan was substantially committed to ruining the man’s life. Finally, closure on some level. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/breaking-judge-sullivan-finally-dismisses-case-general-flynn-following-trump-pardon/?utm_source=Parler&utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons

Good God man if--Gid forbid-- you lose your fingers in a mechanical rice picking machine, use your handstumps to keep producing this sort of thing. Awesome read.

Since we were just making names up last night, I put the fumble on Randy Moss.

You’re boring me cheese whiz. Bills won tonight and all is right in the world. We’ll argue tomorrow. Peace, Of course I do. I’m comfortable with my replies.

Shoshy, When I feel I’m being attacked, I respond in the nicest way I can. I understand if you think it’s me—because I certainly can understand supporting the use of legal system as being seen as edgy, conspiracy minded etc. Again, if you’re playing hall monitor, spread it around. See again... you paint Gore as some heroic figure. He wasn’t, he was a partisan looking to overturn the election. He lost the election. It was done. He chose to try a Hail Mary and swing for the fences. He lost because his argument was weak, regardless of it was 537 votes or 57,370. He lost because he was wrong...and still the Republic survived. That was a long time ago, and these last 4 years changed everything. The only chasm is what you personally choose to see.

I would not expect you to be able to dial in, you’re emotionally stunted. Other than that carry on.

Again, at the risk of appearing rude, the question of evidence or lack thereof is best answered by you. I don’t care one way or the other what you think or feel. That’s the beauty of being an American. As for damaging the republic, I have a few thoughts on that. First, the republic is strong enough to withstand legal challenges that come with results a candidate chooses to bring. We saw that with Gore v The Republic, which ended the way it started. We saw that with Trump = Russia and all that nonsense the suckers drank in, going from “Treason!” to “If not treason then obstruction of justice in defending himself against baseless accusations!”. We saw that with Clinton’s impeachment, with the phony Trump impeachment and the Mike Flynn debacle. We saw it with the assault on decency and the SC in the Kavanaugh gearing, and the republic marched on. Now that said, there is a part of me that recognizes the brilliance of the “destroy Trump at every turn” strategy employed by the liberals for 5 years. They’ve tossed everything at him and you—the faithful— gobble it up like a Lewinsky on a presidential staff. Trump, to you folks, is everything someone could possibly be...liar cheater homophobe misogynist islamaphobe Xenophobe racist sexist Russian spy and so on. You buy it all, and while that doesn’t make you bad husbands, fathers or sons or daughters, it does make you almost impossibly gullible. We’ve got @oldmanfan lamenting his wicked life before coming to Jesus in the form of Biden like it matters at all. Anyway, understanding how emotionally pliable you sorry bastards are, they ran gamut after gamut and guess what—it worked. You voted in large numbers for a guy who eats his pudding through a straw and often has no idea who he ran against. Again, old man fan brags about voting for a ham Sammy over Trump and guess what—mission accomplished, he did. So, let’s even assume the goal is to destroy the confidence in our system and vilify the opponent in an attempt to prevail in the next election. Honestly, it seems like it was a very effective strategy employed by the Dems for 4 solid years. Trump supporters used to joke “Ah, this time you got him!” when yet another dem dirty truck campaign was introduced. On some level you have to acknowledge that for the libs, hatred sells and it resulted in a creepy old man being announced king. Maybe that is the strategy when all is said and done?

Well..Thank You?

Ah, so you’re still on the Russia Ride. I applaud your perseverance and seeing it through past the point where Heidreich Mueller und his gang of 12 tapped out. So, so much hand wringing.

I’m not the grammar police, I type quickly and auto correct rat f***s the best of us. That said, I’m not sure what your query is. Are you suggesting that I am under the illusion that DJT does not have narcissistic tendencies? I’ve never suggested that, nor do I believe that. I think it’s a job requirement at Senate level and above. Since the question of pretending appears to be projection on your part, I’ll assume we just move on.

Again, I’m always amazed at the level emotional angst of some of you folks. You can sit and watch a Tom Clancy novel play out over 4 years, be led along by your collective noses with tales of bed sheets stained by urine and clandestine meetings in plain sight in Trump freaking tower, only to be left home alone, desperate and dateless when the entire scandal breaks apart and Reinreich Mueller exposed as a guy long past his prime.... and see no problem with it. No stains on the institution, no problems with our reputation abroad, just a bunch of dummies who got skitched for 4 long years shouting RUSSIA in shrill English. On the other hand, pursuing lawful recourse breaks the whole damn thing apart in 30 days? It’s laughable. I admitted nothing, Comrade. I simply acknowledged your feelings as yours and moved on. Again, though, if you’re right, what’s the problem?

My goodness the narcissism🤣. Not you “you”, “you” the collective. Maybe you’re fine (you you, not the you collective here) and dislike the approach but are willing to see it through. People are dropping conspiracy, goal posts, 50 suits by 50 different people, and the fall of the republic. Let’s just agree to disagree and see. It. Through. The evidence submitted. Or lack thereof if you prefer. Either way, I don’t really care.

See, that’s the spirit. I really don’t know why all you folks are fussing so much. You seem to have it in the bag, but there’s an awful lot of hand wringing about things. My advice—just look at what the evidence presented is, consider whether or not it’s valid, and process accordingly. That’s what DJT supporters were forced to do for nearly 4 years. You’ll be fine, and we’ll all be better for it.

There are not 47 Trump cases, Ricky ######o. Why you let people lie to you is beyond me. All I ask for is patience as we see it through. Where is the downside? Shocking— the filter edited out a legal surname. Re Tar Do

You never trust the people in charge in any organization* when they say “No, we didn’t $&@$ up.”. We don’t allow it for Bernie Madhoff, we don’t allow it in criminal trials, and the right to adjudicate it in court is granted in the constitution even if it makes some people squishy in the shorts. *I’m speaking generally of course. We all know that creepy dudes jamming their package while going over boob/over sweater is perfectly acceptable so long as the creeper follows certain political ideaology and “owns” it.

Sure it does. Poll watchers being boxed out. Votes found as if by magic. Pipe breaks that never occurred. People encouraged to leave a polling place during as the count was proceeding. Ballots under tables. Dominion reliability. Statistical anomalies. There’s plenty to be concerned with, so just sit tight as we see it through. Faith in our system is vital, and it has been shaken though incompetence or outright fraud.