leh-nerd skin-erd

She was reportedly involved in the Diddy case and it ended up as sort of a debacle. Seems more likely it was just time to go.

Does it even cost anything when climate science is involved? You can't put a price tag on this sort of $10,000,000,000 program, can you?

Cool, Ned. Thoughts on Dr. Stevie Wonder Fergie being completely blindsided by Biden's decline because no one sent him a Fb post telling him what to think (and when to start thinking it!) from 2020 to 2024? It was "inexcusable", he said!

Oh, I was completely uninterested in the minifesto you wrote in defense of your ignorance of Biden's health issues, and focused on that which we agree on--someone should have helped you understand the very complicated relationship the Biden crew had with the truth, and that the humble Biden supporter was caught completely unaware by Biden's cognitive decline prior to the 2024 debate. For the record moving forward, nothing I have shared here today, in this or prior posts, deals with any speech or public appearance made by or referring to Joe Biden from 1968-2018.

This is where I’m at. I recall coverage of Biden’s performance at the debate and thinking “Wow, his stutter is really, really impacting him tonight.”. Then, later, I thought “Man, he’s not making any sense at all. It has to be the common cold!”. I felt badly for you true believers. I think a phone call to each of you, before the debate, would have gone a long way toward relieving anxiety. The cynical among us will point out how that was impossible given the week to 10 days he prepared in advance to sound so completely lost and befuddled but was it too much to ask Dr. Jill to send a quick handwritten letter to supporters signed by Dr. Jill? Then again, maybe I’m just old fashioned. Btw Fergie—-kudos to you for acknowledging you needed assistance to work through all this. So many people struggle in silence. You’re a very brave young man.

I’m not trying to convince you, Mup, and respect your opinion. The remark about losing sleep was not meant to imply you were, it’s just where I’m at. Still….i think you’re taking two separate issues and combing them into one. Issue 1: Epstein and all he represents. You’re focusing on El Naranja (just found out what that means!) yet imo, a reasonable person should also question the actions of Tapones para el pelo Mr. and Ensalada de la señora Word (apologies if Google translate let me down here). Again, this applies only if you believe a list of powerful people exists and is being kept from the public. That said, I do understand your distrust of President Trump. Issue 2. DJTs handling of the saga post 1/20/25. As I said, I believe he’s handling this poorly. We’ll see what happens and how it impacts him moving forward. Finally, I’m completely uncertain on the suicide issue. In some ways, it reminds me of the Trump assassination attempt in Pa—it was so comically bad and incompetent if it was a set up that it’s hard to believe it was a set up. On the other hand, liberal Senator Chuck Schumer has assured us that the intelligence agency has six ways from Sunday to get someone. 🤷‍♂️ It wasn’t just voting though. It was the resolute belief in Biden and his handlers over nearly 4 full years as he deteriorated in front of our eyes. Then again, these folks were indignant about national security and classified documents until quite predictably their guy had a treasure trove. Then, someone suggested “slippage” and they did an about face.

Ah, there you go. If one is concerned with list/no list, it’s interesting this issue spans two diff admins. There’s no gray area to me. I see it like this: There are no tellers of truth we can rely on. People will leverage the known/unknown to their advantage. People with power will scrub damaging information. The truth will never really be known. —or—- We know the truth. No list. No suicide. I’m in the first camp. I won’t lose any sleep over it.

This must be what it’s like at the UN, when adversaries meet to hash out differences. If I can add a thought here, perhaps include some sort of scandal signal, a “scansig” if you will, if something you post rises to scandal, pre-scandal or potentially may evolve into scandal territory. Maybe something as simple as *S, *PS, or *PMS, or some sort of color coding chart. That may help the non-American posters present (NAPP) though I cannot speak to how to address issues with color blindness that are rumored to plague the Dutch.

Answer to Q1: Irrelevant. The T-shirt likely was made in China. #irony #hotgirlssupportingservitude Beyond that, he definitely seems to be interested in her vector fields, but it has in has nothing to do with the t-shirt. Overalls from Walmart and golf shoes would probably work just as well. I can’t speak to closed curves, I’m a gentleman first. Answer to Q2: Doesn’t matter. When you buy cheap goods from far-off lands, your emotional baggage is packed with shame and self-loathing. Oh—had to visit the doctor a couple weeks back. The nurse asked me to step in the scale, shoes and all, and recorded my weight. Checking my records, I see they logged in my weight fully clothed. Pushed my BMI over 25. I may find a new doctor. Complete b-s.

My unsolicited response to your response is folded over only once: Yes.

Just know you’re supporting the greater good, Roundolph. You’ll see that, when you’re older.

I think DJT is one of the most resilient human beings ever born, with an unfathomable ability to withstand onslaughts from multiple enemies at any time. He took everything his enemies threw at him, not only survived but thrived. Still, this is a big stretch for me. I've never actually seen a Martian. Duh.

I think it’s more likely that the Martians actually landed at the Jersey Shore in 19ought3and 8, and mind-melded all of us into believing it was just a radio broadcast. Thank you.

I don’t think so. I think he played things in a certain way to maximize effect, they lost track of the end game and didn’t stick the landing. There is no need to triangulate coordinates, involve agents skilled in wet work and go full Art of War when you have the goods, have the receipts, and control the delivery of the message. As always though, if I’m wrong, I’m happy to swing back here and take my lumps.

Ever since multiple sources of the day reported that Martian invasion, I’m more or a quality not quantity guy. That’s fair about posting here. However, just because I like to yammer on endlessly does not mean I’m a lawyer. I am not.

alternet is the google of the mwww (mostly world wide web). Cash money.

KaBoom. Very well said.

I’m confident Mup will understand what I wrote while you might need coloring books with dogs, cats and such. Cool story about the spectrum, but you probably should offer more than “Fergie likes pictures of wainbows” if you want to be taken seriously. You’re a pretend doctor on an obscure political forum on a pro football forum—start acting like it! You really have to suspend reality and put aside all that you know to ignore the warts of Joe Biden, but God love ‘em, the liberals here do their level best.

I don’t know how to make it make sense to you, Mup. I’ll try, but it seems you’re hunkered down on this one. Politicians, leaders in the house and senate, certain media members and the like lie. They view facts as pliable, manipulate details as they feel warranted and push on. I think this perspective is centrist, not particularly earth shattering, and shared by the majority of Americans. Lies hang with the truth everyday in DC politics. It’s the standard for any variety of reasons. You hold your nose when your people do it, I hold my nose when the people I support do it, and we move forward. If there is a deep, legitimate cover up it will reflect business as usual. But if there is a deep, legitimate coverup it didn’t start at the inauguration of DJT in January. Might I add, if you feel it now, and felt it then, why weren’t you pounding the table when Garland’s DOJ sat on their hands? That’s a rhetorical question and ties back in to holding noses when the favored people hold office. Let’s be real here indeed. The Trump admin botched the handling of all this, and Bondi has to answer for it. Heavy lies the crown. As far as a list goes (and assuming some credible list with names, dates and details ever existed) I’m sorry, but assuming that list wasn’t scrubbed, reviewed, manipulated, changed, deleted or otherwise altered during the Biden/Garland years makes little sense to me. It’s difficult for me to generate much outrage simply because some liberal leader had a bad case of Rip Van Winkle Syndrome for the past half-decade and suddenly found The Lord on 1/20/25. Why is it gone, if it ever existed? Easiest question of the day—Power corrupts. Victimizers victimize. Some people are above the law.

Come on. He was best friends with Ted Kennedy who flipped a car and left an intern to die. He chased every skirt he could chase. Not to mention there were at least 9 women he acknowledged fondling, and another who accused him of violent sexual assault. His legacy is f’d because he was a numbskull, but he was always a numbskull.

The last guy talks about his uncle being eaten by cannibals, driving imaginary trucks and how he beat the stuffin' out of someone named Medicare. Now, the new admin thinks Joseph is Jospeh. Great, just great.

Why didn’t you just say so? All is forgiven. Big picture, that’s a question for Tibs. He may have heard it at recess, I don’t really know.

Sure. See if you and Johnnie Walker can follow this one. Tibs introduced the notion that Bill Clinton and prominent Dems were involved with Epstein, and as a result were protected by prominent dems. I replied. Tibs wanted to focus only on Trump. I declined, in part because he introduced the notion that Bill Clinton and prominent Dems were potentially involved with Epstein. Big picture, paint by numbers or not.

I never understood why anyone beyond the victims were shielded to begin with. I ascribe to the theory that the top dogs in Washington co-exist under the theory of mutually assured destruction, and that in situations like this, the truth is quite pliable, important documentation has a way of disappearing, and we get what we get. Important to your question is the notion that there was a cover up, and if you feel that way, you certainly do not believe is started in January of this year after the inauguration.

You just mentioned the likelihood/possibility that Bill Clinton and other prominent Dems are on the list. Now you don’t want to talk about it? No, the right thing for me to do is help you see the big picture.