Max Fischer

I think we should ignore the fact that it's a "dangerous" pollutant. I'm still upset that science smeared lead and carbon monoxide as "dangerous." When science and facts start influencing our decisions the terrorists win.

"As the Chairman of the Welcoming Committee, I would like to present this laurel, and hardy handshake . . ." Classic.

Please, please explain why there have been maybe a handful of voter fraud cases brought by state or federal authorities for the past few elections. Hint: while there may be cases of attempt to file false voter registration forms, these "voters" are not added to the voter rolls do to a host of bi-partisan safeguards, and thus, they either do not vote, or if they vote provisionally their vote is thrown out afterward. Don't you get it? Oh, wait, the facts are not the point.

Those who lived from 1865-1913 who would not approve of today's America: - segregationists - anti-Semites - robber barons - the top 1% that owned 90%+ of the wealth - those who employed child labor - those opposed to a woman's right to vote - land owners - the monopolies - stupidnation Shall we go on?

"Jackson warns that he isn't an Obama confidant or adviser, 'just a supporter.'" That pretty much sums it up. Jackson doesn't speak for anyone but Jackson. Obama has made Jackson and Farrakan irrelevant. No one listens to Jackson anymore -- accept the far-right and the NY Post. I'm not a big HRC fan, but only a hater could find anything to dislike in her answers to a reporters questions. Good Lord, get a life.

We should be vigilant and vigorously prosecute anyone who attempts to vote more than once. Fact is, it's very, very difficult to pull off. Does it happen? Yes, but to a scale that is inconsequential. I would say there are far and away more human tabulation and input errors than voter fraud. With today's technology and laws -- put into bi-partisan effect - it is very difficult to pull it off and simply not worth the effort. You only get to vote once under a name and it makes no sense to produce multiple IDs when its so much easier to simply get other people to vote. Under your scenario, how would it work? And more important, why the hell would they use your plan when there are far simpler ways to win an election? Like, get their neighbors to register and then drive them to the polls? Your conspiracy makes no logical sense at all.

So, your solution is armed revolt against the United States? Doesn't that make you a terrorist? I'm calling Cheney.

You lost us there. Take a look at history. Believe it or not, this is the best it's ever been. Please tell us why it was so much "better" before? This should be interesting.

Seriously, which party, third or otherwise, is closer to the way you think things should be? We've been on this same path for 225+ years and I think we've made some pretty good progress. Yes, I understand the Roman analogies but someone needs to be a bit more specific on drawing those similarities and what we should do about it.

So things were "good" 25-30 years ago? You mean Watergate? Were they the good old days? Please name a time in the history of the US or any other nation you would point to as "better." What is your solution?

Yes, you are. The number of prosecutions for voter fraud is minuscule. Why? Because it so very rarely happens. It's simply a propaganda campaign that Republicans bring up every two years. If your really care about fair elections you would express a little outrage about the systematic and very well documented history of voter intimidation and misinformation.

No safe room? Oh, so you live in the fortress? You know, "they." Come on, you know, "them." The US Government. We're among friends. (wink, wink, nudge, nudge). The black helicopters are coming soon. Those I "worship?" You mean the United States? The Constitution? The Declaration of Independence? The republic? Capitalism? I don't know if I call it worship but I think it works fairly well. At least better than the other systems. Why do you bad mouth all those things? Why is it that you are right and everyone else is wrong?

Just how much canned goods and bottles of water do you keep in your safe room? How long do you think you can holdout when they come gunning for you?

Which part don't you support? Will this effect your vote for Obama?

Whoa, whoa, whoa. Back up Hannity. I said, "Find a state that doesn't have a requirement that you must have ID to register" and you say "New Jersey" -- which you admit HAS a requirement that you must show ID -- and I am "wrong?" What world do you live in? Then your excuse is that poll workers are too stupid to match a name with the ID -- or that the Democratic and Republican poll workers are in cahoots to allow anyone to vote? Wow, this is some conspiracy -- but it still demonstrates that you are the one who is completely wrong about the law. Go back to counting black helicopters.

Let us know when you become the least bit relevant, fringe-boy.

Which ones? (Answer: no they can't)

Weak.

So this should give you and other McCain supporters "hope?"

That was then, this is now. Go find a state that doesn't have registration verification. We'll wait, though we don't expect to hear back from you. Nice try. The Republican-controlled Congress did not agree.

So, McCain has a chance because racism and ignorance are alive and well?

We have elections every two years, if people don't like the way its going then they'll vote out the Democrats. Right now people are rejecting the Republicans AND gridlock and fear continued inaction over giving the Democrats a chance to right the ship. God knows that power is finite in many ways.

By endorsing Barr the Libertarian Party seems to have plunged itself into an identity crisis and made it irrelevant. With Barr, who can tell what they really stand for?

So your counter to this argument is to take it to its most ridiculous? Are you telling me there is a mass conspiracy to create fake IDs so illegals can vote and others can vote twice? How many people are involved in this conspiracy that no one but you knows about?

Who?