i like this "comment" after the article:
"OK, but seriously - this is a real problem. I'm all for discussing the strenghts and weaknesses of Darwinism. Any respectable evolutionary biologist would probably agree (not that I am an evolutionary biologist). That's the way that science works. But implying that any flaw in Darwinism and evolution as it's understood today is implicitly supporting the idea of intelligent design is just, well, UNINTELLIGENT! Evolution and creationism are not opposite sides of the same coin. It's not one or the other. Evolution is a scientific theory, based in scientific study and analysis that has been tested and challenged. Creationism is a load of illogical bunk with no basis in anything other than the Bible, and I'm sorry to all those Christians out there but there's just NO PROOF that the Bible contains one lick of truth (even though it does contain a lot of wisdom - but wisdom and knowledge are VERY DIFFERENT THINGS). This issue should have been put to rest when we discovered that, regardless of what God told the Pope, the Earth moves around the Sun, and not the other way around. But I guess some people just can't let go of their ridiculous fantasies.
In short - if you Believe, that's great: religion is a wonderful way to find meaning in your daily life. But keep your religion out of my science class. Cause if you don't, God help me, I'm bringing science to church on Sunday. And my biology textbook has got about 5 pounds on your Bible..."