Only libbys like you think that only groups that have "diversity" have any value. That ole "if its all white, it MUST be bad or racist" line of liberal groupthink, which is pretty bigoted itself, isnt it?
I love the story of my beloved, who works in the inner city and was DEMANDED to teach a "diverse curriculum" and when she pointed out that her class is 90% black and 10% hispanic..and thats not exactly "diverse", her ultra lib union loving politically correct (*^*&%^$^#of an Assistant Principal just sat there, squirmed and mumbled to herself.
And one more thing, you big ass. Us "teabaggers" arent disputing the DIVERISTY or lack thereof of the Tea Party Movement. We dispute the half-assed scare tactic assumption that Carville and your masters trotted out for you to regurgitate fifty times a day that the group is RACIST. We'd LOVE IT if the group was more diverse, but the sad fact is that any black person who crossed the line to join us will be IMMEDIATLEY outcast in his or her community and to his or her family and labeled as an "Uncle Tom sellout." Do you remember when Michael Steele had Oreo cookies thrown at him when he was camaigning for office, or were you too busy "boning up" at the Fire Island Meat-Pack at the time?
But again...in your pea brain Palin obsessed head...."Lack of diversity IS RACISM. PERIOD." There is NO OTHER WAY a group of whites can congregate without a racist intent, is there? Even if the group is from a region where there isnt a person of color present for a 90 mile radius....no brown skinned people in the group MUST mean theres a racist element, right?
Talk about narrow-minded.