Getting mad or pissy at the Jets for getting better is like getting mad or pissy at the guy at work who's been there ten years longer than you getting the raise and promotion.
The JEts are a good coupla years further along in their rebuilding than the Bills are. There is veritually NO comparison between the two team's respective situations.
While I hate Ryan and have to endure Jets fans all around me, I frankly wish them well. Fewer teams in sports has as lousy a history as the Jets have. They have that one game, albiet a big big one, and fourty years of crap. If they have a great team to root for now, good for them.
Like the front office re-org a lot. I admit, Im not sure it will work (who is), but now they got the business guy doing business stuff and the football guys in charge of the football stuff.
Like the Nix move, LOVE the assistant GM (Whalen?) move. Strong football men with a keen eye for talent and similar philosophies on how to build teams in a smaller (read: cash strapped) market.
Gaily move I DIDNT like, but my take on that is "Talk to me in November." By then we will know if Gailey can build a good program or not.
Overall, Im pleased. More sexy hires would have been great but if nothing else, it APPEARS at least in the front office that the proper people are in charge of the things they have the skill sets for.
Im not sure about that. Hes a strict Constitutionalist, so he understand the Seperation Clause better than anyone.
And besdies....goverining from a Judeo/Christian ethic does not necessarily mean "bringing more religion into government"
He would wipe the floor with Obama and ANYONE who debates him, he is a master at that. Good orator, too. If it werent for his past, hes be a terrific candidate. But he's too divisive, his "brand" still suffering from the partisan ranklings of the 90s.
I wonder if the !@#$ writer understands that the typical liberal interpretation that no blacks in an organization means they were puposely "excluded" is in itself racist becuase it implies that unless whites ACTIVELY "recruit" blacks into a public office, or a job or just about anything else, they dont have the mental or physical capacity to to it themselves...that they "need" whites to "show them the way" and a simple open door isnt good enough.
Youre right....next time a 767 pumps itself into the side of a skyscraper, I can think to myselfd "well, at least we didnt splash water on the face of the pilot's brother"
Behar, O'Donnell (SHES back...AWESOME!!!!!), Garafalo, Maher...whatever.
Just those open, tolerant, enlightened folks providing thought filled, calm, polite and classy political debate and discourse on the subjects of the day.
Youre right. Only liberals pride themselves on being dishonest degenerates.
Funny though...you get really huffy when someone trots out a Union stereotype, but you have ZERO problem using them yourself.
So I was blasting thyough the channels last night and was "lucky" enough to catch theever classy Joy Behar on some show getting into the Rove book, andhaving some choice words about the family issues Rove revealed about his mother's suicide and him being adopted. Classy and open minded as ever, Behar rippedinto Rove and his family with some pretty vulgar comments about Rove and his family.
So....what timne TODAY does Behar give us her comments about the "hate filled rhetoric" of those on the right and lectures us all on "tolerance and open-minded debate"?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/35152.html
Lets see all the libby talking heads and clowns show the same outrage and bloviate about "hate" like they did a few days ago when one of their Congressmen had some spittle land on him.
I wont hold my breath.
It is NOT primarily used by the Teamsters, you dolt. Every union in NYC, from Sheetmetal workers, to electric Local 3, to the Dockbuilders, Steamfitters, to the Carpetry Union use that !@#$ing ridiculous thing every time a non-union worker does as much as steps NEAR a job site.
You dont even know the true workings of what you carry a flag so high for! LOL.
Thats a completely !@#$ing ridiculous example to disprove what Im saying and you know it.
And I DID was I was "GUESSING" at what the ACTUAL "ratio" would be.
So stop.
Its kind of simplistic to think that if abortion was illegal, all those babies that would "have to" be born would be "unwanted."
Im guessing that at LEAST 9/10 of those so called "unwanted" kids would move into the "wanted" column once the mom looks into that kid's eyes for the first time.
Parenthood and protection of one's newborn and child is a pretty powerful !@#$ing thing. One of the basic instincts of nature.