RkFast

Even LIBERALS are killing Stretch over this thing. Remember Ed Norton in that flick where he plays the nazi? He comes out of the house and takes on the guys trying to rob him...and says "You just messed with the wrong !@#$ing bull." Pelosi just !@#$ed with the wrong bull...the CIA. Shes DONE. These people document when they go take a dump.

Yes...it is. Only a child who hasnt developed multi dimentional thinking yet would feel otherwise. You want Obama to think and make decisions like a child would? Maybe thats it...liberals are children. Its all about "feelings", casting away reality and one dimensional thinking.

Define: torture

freakshowsayswhat?

Annie agrees with you. Sorry http://www.anncoulter.com/ WATCHING MSNBC IS TORTURE May 6, 2009 The media wail about "torture," but are noticeably short on facts. Liberals try to disguise the utter wussification of our interrogation techniques by constantly prattling on about "the banality of evil." Um, no. In this case, it's actually the banality of the banal. Start with the fact that the average Gitmo detainee has gained 20 pounds in captivity. There's even a medical term for it now: "the Gitmo gut." Some prisoners have been heard whispering, "If you think Allah is great, you should try these dinner rolls." In terms of "torture," there was "the attention grasp," which you have seen in every department store you have ever been where a mother was trying to get her misbehaving child's attention. If "the attention grasp" doesn't work, the interrogators issue a stern warning: "Don't make me pull this car over." Farther up the parade of horribles was "walling," which I will not describe except to say Elliot Spitzer paid extra for it. And for the most hardened terrorists, CIA interrogators had "the caterpillar." Evidently, the terrorists have gotten so fat on the food at Guantanamo, now they can't even outrun a caterpillar. Contrary to MSNBC hosts who are afraid of bugs, water and their own shadows, waterboarding was most definitely not a "war crime" for which the Japanese were prosecuted after World War II -- no matter how many times Mrs. Jonathan Turley, professor of cooking at George Washington University, says so. All MSNBC hosts and guests were apparently reading "Little Women" rather than military books as children and therefore can be easily fooled about Japanese war crimes. (MSNBC: The Official Drama Queen Network of the 2012 Olympics.) Given what the Japanese did to prisoners, waterboarding would be a reward for good behavior. It might be: waterboarding PLUS amputating the prisoner's healthy arm, or waterboarding PLUS killing the prisoner. But waterboarding on the order of what we did at Guantanamo would be a reward in a Japanese POW camp. To claim that the Japanese -- architects of the Bataan Death March -- were prosecuted for "waterboarding" would be like saying Ted Bundy was executed for engaging in sexual harassment. What the Japanese did to their POWs made even the Nazis blanch. The Japanese routinely beheaded and bayoneted prisoners; forced prisoners to dig their own graves and then buried them alive; amputated prisoners' healthy arms and legs, one by one, for sport; force-fed prisoners dry rice and then filled their stomachs with water until their bowels exploded; and injected them with chemical weapons in order to observe, time and record their death throes before dumping them in mass graves. While only 4 percent of British and American troops captured by German or Italian forces died in captivity, 27 percent of British and American POWs captured by the Japanese died in captivity. Japanese war crimes were so atrocious that even rape was treated as only a secondary war crime in the Tokyo trial, similar to what happens during an R. Kelly trial. The Japanese "water cure" was to "waterboarding" as practiced at Guantanamo what rape at knifepoint is to calling your secretary "honey." The Japanese version of "waterboarding" was to fill the prisoner's stomach with water until his stomach was distended -- and then pound on his stomach, causing the prisoner to vomit. Or they would jam a stick into the prisoner's nose so he could breathe only through his mouth and then pour water in his mouth so he would choke to death. Or they would "waterboard" the prisoner with saltwater, which would kill him. Meanwhile, the alleged "torture" under the Bush administration consists of things like: -- "failing to respect a Serbian national holiday"; or -- "forgetting to wear plastic gloves while handling a Quran." Finding out who started the tall tale about "waterboarding" being treated as a war crime after World War II would take the talents of a forensic historian, someone like Christina Hoff Sommers. After years of hearing the feminist "fact" that emergency room admissions for women beaten by their husbands soared by 40 percent on Super Bowl Sundays, Sommers traced it back to an unsubstantiated rumination erupting from a feminist rap session. But the lunatic claim was passed around with increasing credibility until it ended up being cited as hard fact in The New York Times, The Boston Globe and on "Good Morning America." One of the earliest entries in the "waterboarding as war crimes" myth must be this October 2006 article in The Washington Post, citing a case raised by Sen. Teddy Kennedy -- and heaven knows Kennedy understands the horrors of a near-drowning: "Twenty-one years earlier, in 1947, the United States charged a Japanese officer, Yukio Asano, with war crimes for carrying out another form of waterboarding on a U.S. civilian. The subject was strapped on a stretcher that was tilted so that his feet were in the air and head near the floor, and small amounts of water were poured over his face, leaving him gasping for air until he agreed to talk." Even if that description of what Asano did were true -- and it isn't -- the only relevant word in the entire paragraph is "civilian." Any mistreatment of a civilian is a war crime. So every other part of that paragraph is utterly irrelevant to the treatment of prisoners of war, much less non-uniformed enemy combatants at Guantanamo, who could have been shot on sight under the laws of war. What Americans need to understand is that under liberals' own "laws of war," they will invent apocryphal incidents from history in order to give aid and comfort to America's enemies and to undermine those who kept us safe for the past eight years.

Count me in...this is !@#$ing ridiculous.

NOW do you libs get why the Right said "Good Riddance" to this guy? We took Zell. You got Arlen. Id call that a wash.

Make sure your copy of The Audacity of Mein Hope is clearly visible on your coffee table.

Go to 5:33. One of DD's forgotten Gems. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBBqc-e87PY

If Savage had a sign that says "Behead those who Insult Islam" he would have been welcomed with open arms.

RIP. Godspeed, Captian! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFW-PRNQFXk...feature=related

Ive had this happen to me and it did not go over well...with anybody, including some gay folks in attendence besides those two parkating in "how much spit can we swap and how much can I feel your breasts before dessert arrives?" And the only "teachable moment" was teaching these incosiderate azzholes to save their PDA for somewhere where there arent kids around. Man + woman or woman + woman. Keep your !@#$ing hands to yourself. Go ahead...flame me for wanting people to show some manners and decorum.

Yes. That only half-wits like you would be shocked that one of the leading conservative commentators have COMMENTARY on the state of the GOP.

Please tell us, Mr. Independent how a Conservative pundit commenting on affairs of the GOP is "news." WOW...Rush Limbaugh has commentary about the GOP and its relationship with a woman who ran for VP under the GOP ticket. What a !@#$ing bolt of lightning THAT is!

Disgusting how people ask that others on TBD "pray for them" and what not in LAMP posts for as little as having to take a test in Bio 101 or becuase their grass wont grow right under their oak tree in the back yard, let alone for major sh--, but because what happenned here affected the "hated" Cowboys, jokes are made. People are hurt. A man lies paraylized. Grow the !@#$ up.

Annie slays them again. MUSLIMS: 'WE DO THAT ON FIRST DATES' April 29, 2009 Without any pretense of an argument, which liberals are neurologically incapable of, the mainstream media are now asserting that our wussy interrogation techniques at Guantanamo constituted "torture" and have irreparably harmed America's image abroad. Only the second of those alleged facts is true: The president's release of the Department of Justice interrogation memos undoubtedly hurt America's image abroad, as we are snickered at in capitals around the world, where they know what real torture is. The Arabs surely view these memos as a pack of lies. What about the pills Americans have to turn us gay? The techniques used against the most stalwart al-Qaida members, such as Abu Zubaydah, included one terrifying procedure referred to as "the attention grasp." As described in horrifying detail in the Justice Department memo, the "attention grasp" consisted of: "(G)rasping the individual with both hands, one hand on each side of the collar opening, in a controlled and quick motion. In the same motion as the grasp, the individual is drawn toward the interrogator." The end. There are rumors that Dick "Darth Vader" Cheney wanted to take away the interrogators' Altoids before they administered "the grasp," but Department of Justice lawyers deemed this too cruel. And that's not all! As the torments were gradually increased, next up the interrogation ladder came "walling." This involves pushing the terrorist against a flexible wall, during which his "head and neck are supported with a rolled hood or towel that provides a C-collar effect to prevent whiplash." People pay to have a lot rougher stuff done to them at Six Flags Great Adventure. Indeed, with plastic walls and soft neck collars, "walling" may be the world's first method of "torture" in which all the implements were made by Fisher-Price. As the memo darkly notes, walling doesn't cause any pain, but is supposed to induce terror by making a "loud noise": "(T)he false wall is in part constructed to create a loud sound when the individual hits it, which will further shock and surprise." (!!!) If you need a few minutes to compose yourself after being subjected to that horror, feel free to take a break from reading now. Sometimes a cold compress on the forehead is helpful, but don't let it drip or you might end up waterboarding yourself. The CIA's interrogation techniques couldn't be more ridiculous if they were out of Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition sketch: Cardinal! Poke her with the soft cushions! ... Hmm! She is made of harder stuff! Cardinal Fang! Fetch ... THE COMFY CHAIR! So you think you are strong because you can survive the soft cushions. Well, we shall see. Biggles! Put her in the Comfy Chair! ... Now -- you will stay in the Comfy Chair until lunchtime, with only a cup of coffee at 11. Further up the torture ladder -- from Guantanamo, not Monty Python -- comes the "insult slap," which is designed to be virtually painless, but involves the interrogator invading "the individual's personal space." If that doesn't work, the interrogator shows up the next day wearing the same outfit as the terrorist. (Awkward.) I will spare you the gruesome details of the CIA's other comical interrogation techniques and leap directly to the penultimate "torture" in their arsenal: the caterpillar. In this unspeakable brutality, a harmless caterpillar is placed in the terrorist's cell. Justice Department lawyers expressly denied the interrogators' request to trick the terrorist into believing the caterpillar was a "stinging insect." Human rights groups have variously described being trapped in a cell with a live caterpillar as "brutal," "soul-wrenching" and, of course, "adorable." If the terrorist manages to survive the non-stinging caterpillar maneuver -- the most fiendish method of torture ever devised by the human mind that didn't involve being forced to watch "The View" -- CIA interrogators had another sadistic trick up their sleeves. I am not at liberty to divulge the details, except to mention the procedure's terror-inducing name: "the ladybug." Finally, the most savage interrogation technique at Guantanamo was "waterboarding," which is only slightly rougher than the Comfy Chair. Thousands of our troops are waterboarded every year as part of their training, but not until it was done to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- mastermind of the 9/11 attack on America -- were liberal consciences shocked. I think they were mostly shocked because they couldn't figure out how Joey Buttafuoco ended up in Guantanamo. As non-uniformed combatants, all of the detainees at Guantanamo could have been summarily shot on the battlefield under the Laws of War. Instead, we gave them comfy chairs, free lawyers, better food than is served in Afghani caves, prayer rugs, recreational activities and top-flight medical care -- including one terrorist who was released, whereupon he rejoined the jihad against America, after being fitted for an expensive artificial leg at Guantanamo, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer. Only three terrorists -- who could have been shot -- were waterboarded. This is not nearly as bad as "snowboarding," which is known to cause massive buttocks pain and results in approximately 10 deaths per year. Normal human beings -- especially those who grew up with my older brother, Jimmy -- can't read the interrogation memos without laughing. At Al-Jazeera, they don't believe these interrogation memos are for real. Muslims look at them and say: THIS IS ALL THEY'RE DOING? We do that for practice. We do that to our friends. But The New York Times is populated with people who can't believe they live in a country where people would put a caterpillar in a terrorist's cell. www.anncoulter.com

Obama wants to force detainees to have lunch with Ms. California. Homos everywhere are outraged. So is Hedd.

Next up on the turture "ladder"....not saying "please."

I heard giving the subject the stink eye will soon be considered "torture."

I recall a certain Austrian that also stressed the failure of democracy and capitalism.

Most conservatives admit and expect a liberal to be appointed and all we hope for is that whomever it is isnt to the left of Chomsky. But according to dunderheads like Hedd, such thinking makes us "radicals." Funny sh--.

So you just admitted and confirmed that liberals seek to treat the Consititution like Lou Brown treated Roger Dorn's contract. Good work.

Hey Turk....1991 called. They want their offense back. Maybe we can all close our eyes and pretent Jim Kelly is out there.

Roberts is a "far right activist", huh? And that "moderate" Obama is going to pick someone "in the middle?" LOLOLOL. He has ALREADY said he wants to appoint a judge who will give preference and power to the poor and those who dont have access to political power. Which, sounds really nice, but considering a judge is suppossed to be IMPARTIAL, is troubling, to say the least.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30471035 LOLOL.