RkFast

Different than Bill Maher calling Sarah Palin a "waitress" three days after the RNC how?

"Por La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada" Let me know if any of the other "groups" listed here have a similar motto.

What the !@#$ is THIS nonsense? Holy sh--.

Tolerance, as practiced in REAL LIFE, is whole helluva lot different (and better) than how its practiced by blowhard professors in acedemia (and their students), on message boards, and on bumper stickers. Try it sometime.

Leave him be. Being judge and jury just makes him feel good. Amazing how someone who jerks himself off over how "open minded" he is can be judge and jury over your ability to be so...from a message board. I have a funny feeling us "traditionalists" are a lot more comfortable in our stance on this issue and the homosexuals close to us, friends and/or family are as well. For me...they KNOW my stance. But they dont care...because I love them and accept them for who THEY are and what THEY want to do and we all know MY opinion means bupkus when they walk out my door after dinner. In fact, we all have a good laugh about it quite often. They call me a right wing loon...I call them fags. And then we laugh and enjoy good wine. Imagine that....Its that crazy "live and let live" thing again!

Thats not whats coming out of a lot of pundits defending this pick. Look...Im not even sure if I personally like the pick or not. I have reservations with her "brown people can make decisions better" nonsense and tacit approval of judicial activism. But shes a liberal....and replacing another liberal. Whats she going to do? Be MORE liberal? Whatever. But the die has been cast...youre hearing already how this pick is "ironclad" and "above critque" and some comments about the pick are already been called "sexist" or "anti-Latino." Thats crazy. Its crazy.....where the !@#$ were these people when Clarence Thomas or Atty. Gen. Gonzalez were getting ass raped by those who wanted to bring them down? She should be grilled and questioned properly. She has made some questionable statement and they need to be clarified.

Give it a rest......if we try to "think critically" about Obama's justice pick, we will automatically be called racists, sexists....even showing bigotry against those with diabetes, which she has. I heard shes a cyclist...I wonder if I critique her choice of Assos bibs over Pearls, the "illuminated" elites will get on me for THAT, too.

Thats becuase to the media and elites, they are liberal and therefore, "real". To the elites and the left, Powell, Rice and Clarence Thomas were nothing more than a buncha sellout House Niggas.

"I wouldn't !@#$ Sandra Bernhardt with Bea Arthur's dick." --Jeffrey Ross

Im sure you will then accept today's ruling by the CA SC WRT gay marriage without issue. Or, like MOST nimrods, do you define "prevailing" as "my"?

Um...hate to burst your bubble, but right now the Bills are subletting an apartment from DET in the "NFL Building."

Shes going to be asked in the hearings. Her answers will tell the tale.

So becuase she has the "balls" to ADMIT and EMBRACE her bias, that makes her a better judge? Are drug addicts, racists and other wonderful cretins that have the "balls" to admit and embrace their feelings also "illuminating and refreshing" to you?

Unless she was talking about a decision that involved a latino person, thats a blatantly biased statement she made. And frankly, I dont care "my guy" lost. I EXPECTED a liberal to be nominated. "My guy" got to put in two conservative justices, so I expect a liberal President to now put in a liberal justice when given the opportunity.

Ugh...go read the thread.

Someone who is in a certain class steps before the SCOTUS and has one stike against him before a word is uttered. Just as John Adams and the rest of the Founding Fathers intended.

Whacko! Not her....YOU.

But shes a latina, so she's really "struggled" and is "down" with the stuggles of minorites. As Dear Leader demands, Ms. Sotamayor wants to make her decisions through the prism and her evaluation of the so-called "stuggles" of those who stand before her. Basically, if youre not in a certain "class", youve got one strike before you before you utter a word in her court. Nice, huh?

I heard the real BHO is a dump truck operator from Scranton, PA. Bowls with his league Tuesday nights and has been married to a fine lady Myrna for 25 years. A good man.

I wonder if the leftards are up in arms today because Adam Lambert lost. Ya know...how those close-minded homophobicchristianwhitemenrushlistersblahblsahblah kept him down.

Yup.

Personally, Im not high on Vick. But heres a little litmus test for you. If Bruce clipped some teenage girl last week instead of getting pulled over for the THIRD TIME for DUI.....how many of you would cancel your hotel in Canton this coming August?

I hate azzholes who walk in, make it rain, and steal all the action.

First of all, one of the LAST people on this God-forsaken pit of a site to be the arbiter of that is stupid and what is not is YOU. So get youre stupid !@#$ing cat out of my face before I shave it, pull out its whiskers, bury it up to its neck and run it over with my John Deere. NOW....... On to your question...Ill just say this. The US Gubmint is going to take over the health care system and eventually....not at first....but eventually start mandating not just which treatments youre entitled to and eligible for, but which ones youre REQUIRED to get. I can EASILY see a mandate that all participants with cholesterol "bad" over a level of 245 be required to be perscribed a statin drug/ This is unlike the current system, where this choice of treatment is simply opional and others freely choose things like diet and excersise changes to get their bad cholesterol down. But in the US' UHC model, I strongly feel the concept of "optional" treatments will be severely curtailed. Your cholesterol a big higer than "we" would like it....you must take this drug. Your blood pressure a bit too high, you must take this one. Suffer from migranes, take this treatment. And if you dont do any of these things.....your coverage is cancelled and/or cut back. Also, Olivier is saying "that doesnt happen in France." Well...duh...this isnt France nor Europe. This isnt just the last of the "free", but the land of the "regulated" and Id bet quite a lot that for every "rule" in the European model of UHC, there will be four in the U.S.' version of it.

You have just realized and embraced one of the fundamental pillars of being against government-run Universal Health Care. Welcome