-
Posts
31,112 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by GG
-
Are you going to argue a hypothetical that doesn't exist? Yes, I would trade a 2nd for DeAndre Hopkins, please.
-
I just did
-
I don't disagree with that, and that's why I'm saying that trading for a WR would be a waste of a draft pick because he still doesn't use them fully.
-
Did you see the All-22 of that play? Allen stared him down for an extra second. If he threw the ball a split second earlier, McKenzie walks in the end-zone. It's here.
-
It’s not even the tight windows now. The WRs are open, but not fully open. That’s why I keep harping on Allen’s toss to Duke in 3Q. I think it was the best throw in his NFL career, and hopefully more like that will come.
-
It’s still an open question, but there are enough green shoots to be optimistic for the next summer of recovery. i thought that All-22 of his first half would be awful, but it wasn’t all that bad. You have to recognize that Bills drafted a physically gifted QB with horrible fundamentals, and it will take a while to correct all flaws. The game tape doesn’t lie and there are open receivers all over the place, but Allen is still too timid to trust the NFL throws. For me the progress has been in seeing him move past the first read. He’s been doing that a lot more this year, but he’s still not pulling the trigger on those throws and still bails to the run too soon. I don’t see an Emanuel Sanders fixing Allen’s issues, because we already have Brown, McKenzie & “Foster”. Why waste a draft pick on a redundant asset when your QB doesn’t make those throws on a regular basis?
-
That is immaterial to the offense the Bills run. On any given play, Daboll had the WRs open. He doesn't have a vet QB
-
WR is not a pressing need for this team
-
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I repeated the oft-cited excuse of language parsing by the sideline mob, which you continue in this thread - Republicans are to be taken literally, but Democrats are given a pass because they never speak literally. So if we take your concerns at their true literal value, Republican words could be more dangerous or they could be more beneficial to the country because they are literal and serious. Democrat words shouldn't matter because metaphors aren't real (kind of like usurping a celebrity's real name as an online persona). -
Tuesdays are the days for roster moves.
-
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
If you hold Trump's literal words to a group of journalists as a sign of treachery, what is your opinion on the literal words of the chair of the house judiciary committee? Which literal words are more dangerous to the country? -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
This is why you're a disingenuous partisan hack who can't support an argument. Did he do it as the presiding chair of an important House committee hearing? -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
This is why you're a disingenuous partisan hack. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
I can do this all day. This is why you're a disingenuous partisan hack. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Easy answer: This is why you're a disingenuous partisan hack. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
This is why you're a disingenuous partisan hack. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
What's worse, a committee chair who lied in a formal committee hearing or the POTUS who made an offhand remark to a bunch of reporters? -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
This has nothing to do with supporting the POTUS, but asking why do you have a double standard? Perhaps that's why you've become a meme. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
This is why you're a disingenuous partisan hack. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Sounds like you agree with the sentiment that Republicans peak literally and Democrats speak in metaphors. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
That's why I'm asking you to post the "literal" statement made by the presiding chair of the House committee to compare notes. -
Note that there's zero accusation of racism by the bearded hippy
-
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Can you follow up with Schiff's opening statement on the Ukraine transcript? … I take that, as a no? -
Some next day observations from my DVR
GG replied to John from Riverside's topic in The Stadium Wall Archives
You are correct. That pass is thrown about 1/2 second too late. This is a key step that Allen needs to make in his maturity as a QB. He still doesn't have or trust his instincts to throw receivers open. This was the third play in that opening drive where Allen was looking in the right direction, but didn't pull the trigger to an eventually wide open WR. Hopefully those are throws he learns to make, which is why his big toss to Duke later in the game was so important. -
Trump on United States Constitution - "Phony"
GG replied to Warren Zevon's topic in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Because as always, Republicans speak literally, while Democrats speak in metaphors.