dickleyjones

i reject nothing. it is part of the evidence. we know much more than that. for example, that the iba and ioc are at odds over this and much more. and more evidence beyond that. but none of it is proof, just evidence, i think you know those two things are not the same. again, that doesn't mean you are wrong. but it doesn't mean you are right. we do not know the truth.

i don't like or dislike the evidence you presented. it's just some of the picture. certainly you wouldn't suggest all the governing bodies involved are unbiased? there is still zero proof. maybe you are right. maybe you are wrong. we do not know. im starting to think your agenda is so important to you that you are unwilling to admit that.

ok let me try "trisomy 13" there, proven. you now have trisomy 13, im sorry. compelling.

i think there is a good argument why XY is enough of a disqualifier. you may argue that means we get it wrong sometimes but that will always be the case. given that, i would rather err on the side of someone missing out vs the alternative. all that said, it is a tricky issue. it's gonna take a while to get figured out.

again, no proof. and i understand genetics as well as my education could provide, probably better than most. it's one thing to say what you think is true. that's fine. but it is only what you think, not what you know. the attacks on this person are basically "i know this is a man therefore it is wrong" which is a poor argument without proof.

where is the test? just saying a karyotype is not proof

it is not interest, it is just more us vs them. yawn. and i feel the same way about both vp picks. as for Trudeau...he has little to no power over us compared to the USA.

All this for a vp pick. Lol.

Zero proof that she is not a woman. ZERO. Utterly abhorrent to attack another human with no real reason, just chomping at the bit to hate whoever is next i guess? Yes, protect women's sport. This is not the way to do that.

Haha yeah, i don't believe the trump dictator nonsense either.

I think the 10 people in here in constant outrage mode is not a good indicator of the general bills fanbase. This forum is a holdover from the old forums, my guess is very few at TBD actually frequent ppp because the general feeling is "it's a cesspool".

Riiiight. "Dictator" Trudeau will be voted out next year. Through the power of his dictatorship he will relinquish power to the other side. Cause that's what dictators do.

totally agree about viciousness. it's unhealthy and unnecessary and it's rampant among the political spectrum.

i would rather be a gross lady at Applebees than a feckless beauty queen with delusions of moral superiority at... Salvatore's? (Salvatore's is the only Buffalo area "fancy" restaurant i know).

maybe. he had others though. it's not about his lies or anything to do with Trump really. it's about showing that she can fight the good fight, be tough, stand up for herself and others and, most importantly, not get upset by Trump's attacks. I'm sure she did that in court. I haven't seen her do it much the past 4 years, she's been wearing the "everything is ok" mask that most VPs need to, she needs to pull the switch for her to do well.

jeez man, do better. or be best. whatever the saying is now. just..."ugly"? that's a valid retort? no wonder you guys can't be friends, always fighting, no matter what, keep that fight train going, cause that's what Americans love i guess

nah he has been much better than that. Clinton "he pays no taxes" Trump "that makes me smart" - that alone was both correct AND hilarious. and of course the constant "on the attack" style is exactly what the base and Rs want. i think it works very well for him. if he can manage to stay on topics important to voters, and not how black Harris is for example, he will be fine.

The lefties saying Trump is terrible in debate have not been paying attention. He's been just fine, does what he needs to do. Although i will say he was better vs Clinton than Biden, he was funnier and less doomy. There are more questions about Harris' debate skills. Not great during the primaries, blase in the VP debate (but those debates are usually blase), stronger in Senate hearing type situation. If she can tone down the politik act and channel her inner prosecutor i think she can get tough and do well, but if it's just more...pandery 'meh'...it won't serve her well.

let me guess... R's hate Walz cause he's a democrat. Fight! D's hate Vance cause he's a republican. Fight! once again, the centrists have to be the adults in the room.

never got to see Triumph but i have done work at their studio and it was amazing. lots of gold records on the walls. meh, Trudeau isn't a communist, he's a neocon like our other main party. one and the same. he had a chance to prove different with electoral reform (we are still using obaolete fptp like you guys) but lied and did nothing instead. dont worry though, we Canadians have a fine tradition of voting people out when we get sick of their face and it seems that Trudeau has crossed that threshold.

well then enjoy your descent into communism, i guess? at least you can say you went down honestly, not the kind of consolation prize i would strive for but hey i live under a monarchy with a democratic parliament things stay the same unless actual heads roll

when it comes to winning, i consider myself ruthless. that's not very Canadian of me, i know, but winners write the history books. so when i see all these accusations vs Ds i can only wonder what it will take for the Rs to clue in. or, you know, die on the supposed moral high ground.

why are the Rs so far behind in election tactics (including cheating)? if you really believe your country is on the line then winning should be your top priority.

lol the hand wringing is hilarious. keep it coming!

why bother talking policy until we know she is really running? i mean, I HEAR THERE IS A BIG MOVEMENT TO “BRING BACK CROOKED JOE.”