Jump to content

John from Riverside

Community Member
  • Posts

    47,292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by John from Riverside

  1. 6 minutes ago, Pete said:

    Bills will trade up and get their guy just so KC doesnt pull that ***** again

    The thing is, there’s really not a need to do that
     

    There is going to be more than one right answer in this draft

  2. There are literally like 5 to 6 wide receivers, not counting the ones that are going to go early in the first round that I would be perfectly happy with
     

    Franklin is the guy that I’ve been pounding the table for but I feel like he had a poor combine

    • Agree 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:

     

    This is my thinking. Sometimes you just have to take the best player instead of drafting a guy because he's big. Thats how we ended up with James Hardy all those years ago. You can argue with me that McConkey is the best player at WR at 28 but I refuse to just say we need to draft a big guy there for the sake of it. I totally understand that thought process when you look at the composition of the roster.

    I think this is a different type of draft you’re not going to get a Hardy because there are literally like 15 wide receivers. They can come in and contribute immediately in this draft. It’s a very strong wide receiver draft.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. Would like to see him have a defined role in the slot. There are several go get it receivers in this draft that we can take it 28.
     

     

    I’m a troy Franklin guy but let’s say for instance that the bills took Keon Coleman at 28 think he wouldn’t have a defined role on the team??

  5. 5 hours ago, SCBills said:


    Trump’s biggest issue is his narcissistic obsession to crap all over vote-by-mail. 
     

    Also - In states like Georgia and Arizona, he’s struggled with the “RINO” vote.  Problem is, those are reliable voters.  The voters he’s brought in are low propensity voters who never really voted until Trump came onto the scene.  They don’t show up in special elections and midterms.  
     

    It’s a huge issue for Republicans nationally and locally - See, Long Island where R’s waited to day of to vote in their special election only to have a big snow storm.

     

    Kari Lake running in Arizona where she has a mortal enemy in John McCain’s daughter.  It’s all so haphazard and ridiculous. 
     

    Abortion might get one more bite at the apple as a mass motivating issue this fall, but if Trump does come out at 15 weeks, it takes a lot of steam out of that issue.  The pro-choice single issue voters and ultra-liberal unmarried women will obviously be motivated to vote, but 15 weeks is aimed at the suburban voters who aren’t entirely comfortable with what’s occurred since Roe was overturned.  Trump was never winning the first group.. he can certainly win back the second group. 

    Except your glossing over the fact that Donald Trump said that he was proud of what he did regarding abortion putting in those conservatives into the Supreme Court
     

    People do watch TV

  6. 22 minutes ago, gonzo1105 said:


    Coleman is going to go in round 2. People knocking him for not being as fast as guys 30 pounds lighter than him is insane. All that did today was knock him out of the first round and it’s exactly the reason why Mitchell will be a 1st rounder now. Coleman is a good football player so I agree with you 

    Except for his 40 time Coleman look like an absolute man beast out there
     

    I know it’s the underwear Olympics, but the kid looks really good

  7. 8 hours ago, Thurmal34 said:

    Imagine losing 35% to 65% and thinking you have a shot.

     

    overturning roe finished the gop on a national level.

     

    wont be about biden, wont be about trump.

     

    will be about controlling women's bodies.

    Been trying to tell them
    They’ll just have to see it whenever the elections happen

  8. 10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    No I'd be leery too. I'm not saying he is what I'd do - he doesn't use his hands well enough for me and people who have engaged with me for years on this stuff know I really value hands for pass rushers. But I can imagine the Bills loving him. He feels like their type to me. They love these athletic freaks and while he is slightly undersized he is still big enough I think - and we know from Ed Oliver they are willing to overlook size for explosiveness. He is astronomically high ceiling even if I think his floor is pretty low. 

    Lack of college production might scare them away as well. It should.
     

    This just seems to be the year the wide receiver makes sense

    • Agree 2
  9. 1 hour ago, 947 said:

    8hjq07.thumb.jpg.c5e7cd91a93a1618c8d135bdd5c18abe.jpg

    Well, played sir well played

    3 hours ago, MiracleAtRich1393 said:

    Totally agree. Plus they have Sneed on the trade block for a first. They could vault into the top 10 easily or get 2 quality WRs in the next tier. I really think we need to get one of the top 3 wideouts just to stay even with them. I'm fine giving up #28, next year's first, next year's third with an assumed comp pick coming back like this year, our combined three extra 5ths & 6ths this year, plus a player. Then draft another WR in second or third round who would be ready to blossom as a #2 to Nabers' #1 as Diggs transitions to a lesser role or retires. Every other need can be addressed with bargain FAs, day 3 picks, and UDFAs. A guy like Nabers would be a difference-making stud for a decade+

    Unfortunately Fiske is 24 years old and has 31" arms or I'd be drooling 

    Do you know who else had short arms?
     

    Kyle Williams

    • Like (+1) 2
  10. On 2/19/2024 at 7:37 AM, Tommy Callahan said:

    Is that why the dems in here keep burying actual news for moronic threads like this?  

    Let’s be clear this ***** that’s getting posted is not actual news. It’s from opinion hosts that you take as news.
     

    It’s not other peoples fault that you can’t see the difference

    • Eyeroll 1
  11. 53 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

    Whatever helps you sleep at night…😉

    I think it’s more whatever lets you sleep at night

    1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

    It is a conspiracy.  Its obvious the democrats are going to an unprecedented effort that stretches the boundaries of ethics and legality by coordinating legal actions through many court battles while running a full court press to keep Trump from returning to the White House.  

    That sounded like it came straight out of Trump’s mouth. Good job.

    • Eyeroll 1
    • Agree 1
  12. 51 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

    Can’t prosecute when people are being protected by the authorities…

     

    Theres a reason why they didn’t charge Hillary and Biden for crimes regarding documents, yet they have no trouble charging Trump- because people in the Establishment have immunity to commit crimes…

     

    I don’t mind politicians being charged for crimes (they should be), but ALL need to be charged, especially when authorities admitted crimes were committed…👍

     

    Otherwise, people will not agree with the reasons Trump is being charged…And this is why, despite his court troubles, Trump remains the presidential front runner- because people can see through the BS…

     

    It would have destroyed any other candidate, and the Establishment was hoping it destroyed Trump, too…But people are hip to what’s going on, and he will only get stronger, to the dismay of the Left and the Establishment…👍

     

     

     

     

    Sounds like more conspiracy

  13. 54 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

    Can you show where he was convicted? 

    Would it make a difference to you if he was convicted?

     

    and what do you mean by convicted? He is in fact liable for sexual assault forget the money that she received on the defamation for one second there was a legal action before that. Which he didn’t even bother to show up for.

×
×
  • Create New...