Ed_Formerly_of_Roch
-
Posts
9,979 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ed_Formerly_of_Roch
-
-
I don't see any articles in BN or threads here about callups on Saturday, so I take that to mean Davis cleared concussion protocol and no one else is set to be out?? Or did I miss it?
-
When I first read the title, I thought it said Bills sign Aaron Rogers
-
1
-
4
-
-
Certainly the injuries made a big difference, but I do wonder if this loss will take some of the luster off the potential hirings of Johnson and Glenn?
-
51 minutes ago, Buffalo03 said:
Which coaches had hoe names?
Well if you did some checking, you'd probably find a lot of coaches meet that definition!!
Reading it back now and looking at it, to be honest, I can't figure out now what word I was trying to write!
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, SoMAn said:
I’m sure McD can sleep well tonight knowing he has your blessing to continue for at least another season as the Bills head coach. 🙄
Anyone who’s entertained the notion of firing McDermott is a complete idiot in my opinion. The team has won 14 of 18 games in what was expected to be a ‘transition year’ with the exodus of several key players. It would probably have been 15 of 18 if they’d played their best team against the pats. In the process, they handed defeats to the top seeded teams each conference, and also both teams from the last Super Bowl.
But yeah, let’s start looking for McDs replacement if they lose.
When I hear the ‘fire McDermott’ chants, I’m convinced they’re coming from the same idiots who went ballistic when the Bills chose Josh Allen rather than Josh Rosen.And even a bigger idiot if anyone thinks that if they fire McD, someone is going to come in a do a better job. Over the past 5 years combined, the Bills have won the 2nd most games behind the Chiefs 66 to 61. If you exclude the top 5 teams on the list, from that point down, the next 5 to 10 teams would need to take their 6 year combined wins against Bills 5 year totals to catch him and after about #15 on the list would take 7 seasons. Over the past 5 season the Bills are also first in TD's, yards, yards per game, opposing points and points per game (those 2 surprised me a bit) 2nd in first downs and 3rd down percent and a disappointing 4th place in fourth down %, a whole 1.1% behind the leader.
When you look at numbers like that there is so little room for improvement, the likelihood is very very low. I get the argument too, that you can't keep doing the same thing and expect different results, but the counter to that is, If you're going to change something expecting to get better, you need a well laid out plan what's going to change so you get better. And in selecting NFL coaches there really isn't a plan, it's just getting lucky with the right person. If there was a plan many teams would have figured it out and succeeded already. Picking an NFL that will succeed is not much better than the equivalent of playing roulette and hoping you hit on your number.
There was an article in the Athletic the other day discussing how: Teams should also realize that hiring offensive coordinators as head coaches is not critical or even important for making sure your offense and your team contends at the highest levels. and gave 5 examples of winning HC who never called offensive plays John Harbaugh, McD, Campbell, Bowles, and Quinn and then gave some examples of hoe name coaches to hire who never worked out for various reasons
You may be onto something about those complaining about picking the wrong Josh
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, TrentEdwardsCheckDownOn4th said:
So you think the talent gap between josh allen and lamar jackson is greater than the talent gap between the rest of the players on Baltimore vs the rest of the players on buffalo?
Not sure I agree . Lamar and allen are almost identical. The Ravens have 8 pro bowlers outside of the QB vs. 1 for the bills.
Yeah and I'd place Mahomnes closer to Allen and Jackson too.
I also question McVay having the 2nd best coaching score. Yes been to 2 different SB with 2 different QB's but in between no so great. Since last SB win, this is first year they won division and that was more the other teams lost than Rams doing great.
-
1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:
Bengals went to the SB Burrows 2nd season, Taylor's 3rd and were back in the AFCC game the next season.....
Yup and how's they do lately? Did they win the SB, did I miss that? They seem to fit the model of exactly what I described, fast rise, plateau, then falling.
Lets face if the Bills made it to the SB this year and lost, all the McD haters would still be calling for his head. Many would be disappointed if the Bills won the SB as then they'd not be able to argue he needs to be fired. But I'm sure they could still find a reason
-
1
-
-
Seems most teams who get that superstar QB often ascend quickly out of know where, make some bold sometimes somewhat risky moves to get over the top (see Diggs, Miller), but more offend it gets them close, but not all the way and puts them in cap trouble. Coaches and front office folks will also learn from some of their roster building mistakes and do it slightly different after that. So then the team rebuilds/retools around the QB and some other players which is where the Bills are now. Based on preseason expectations, think it went better so far than expected. Bills, Bengals, Dolphins, 49ers all followed that path to name a few. Think the Bengals and Dolphins are couple years behind the Bills so will be interesting to see how they recover. Will they quickly bounce back like Bills did or sink into oblivion like many other teams have done over the years. Dolphins also have the problem of having a QB who is very good, top 10 when healthy, but staying on the field is a problem for him.
Why were the Chiefs the exception, likely because they were already a good team before Mahomes ever got there. Also had a coach with around 15 years experience with roster building (and never winning the SB) before he ever got to KC. Still took him 7 years there before winning his first SB. Chiefs didn't have to "grow up fast" like others did as they already had a decent core to build around the QB.
Add to all that little bit of luck, favorable playoff matchups, avoiding key injuries and events and bad times, and not getting hurt by bad calls all help too.
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, T master said:
Frazier's a good coach & i think he more than likely learned a lot of things from his first go round that he might change, plus seeing what & how the Bills did some things i'm sure he was paying attention .
But when your working for Jerry none of that matters he had 1 of the best coaches ever and screwed that up by pissin him off enough for him to quit . I've done a couple of tours in that stadium and he micro manages every one that comes through the door and i can't imagine what it would be like to have him looking over your shoulder every day .
Saw a good quote the other day:
Jerry would rather lose doing it his way, than win with someone else calling the shots
-
2 hours ago, Kelly to Allen said:
He'll be back next week
Or is the a QB on the Chiefs PS??
-
2
-
-
Based on the odds most of the country think the Ravens are the better team and will win. Prior to the start of season most in the media for good reason,felt this was a rebuilding year, possibly the Bills wouldn't even make the playoffs and the team has certainly done much better than expected.
None of that will matter if the Bills lose Sunday or the following week, or the SB if they get that far, the McD hater will be out in full force saying he must go. Some would be disappointed if the Bills won the SB as they'd have trouble making the argument he needs to be fired. I suppose they could still argue the team didn't win by enough points, so he needs to go!
-
Recall one of the concerns about him was he was pretty well off, so wasn't going to be all that motivated as didn't need the money.
-
2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
He'd need to be willing to play for less than market value to finish up in Buffalo.
I've read Hendrickson from Bengals is likely to get cut, think he'd be better choice.
-
1
-
-
It's promising at the least.
-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:
Yep you're right-when I mean Sunday night, I mean 6:30. Sunday "evening" is probably the better choice of word
Yeah I just figured when you said evening, you must like in Iceland !
-
2
-
-
Just saw a listing of times for next weekend that looks correct
-
1 minute ago, BillytheKid said:
Well the article was wrong. Milano never put on a uniform for that game. Not sure how he or hurt in the 1st qtr unless they were watching him stub his toe on the sideline.
Is it past your bedtime??
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, SUNTANBILLS FAN said:
Wasn’t cook, Milano, Johnson and brown out the first game against Lamar and the ravens?
Just read an article that said Milano, Johnson, Bernard were out and Shakir got hurt in Q1 and didn't return.
Other question is who may have been out for Ravens???
-
7 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:
I hope you're right , as I would much rather that than Sunday night
Don't think there is a Sunday night game, Think NBC has Saturday night game instead. Sunday is 3:00 & 6:30 starts I believe??
-
1 minute ago, BillsFan130 said:
That's fair and maybe you're right with the bills- But if Vikings win, they will give them a Sunday game. (As they are playing on Monday night)
That's true, didn't think about them playing Monday. So unless CBS can "protect" playoff games, I'll bet Bills/Ravens are Saturday night
-
2 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:
Sure, it wasnt a problem. This time.
And this is the game we're talking about, today!
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, JMM said:
You gotta believe it will be the Sat night prime time game
1 hour ago, BillsFan130 said:I gotta think it's Sunday at 6:30.
Best matchup of the week and as long as CBS has that slot, seems like a slam dunk. (Unfortunately)CBS had 2 games this weekend, Fox only one. So my guess is Sunday at 6:30 will be Fox game so not likely an AFC game. Think NBC will have the Saturday night, Fox the early Sat and late Sunday and CBS the "early" 3L30 on Sunday.
Saturday night likely either the Bills/Ravens or maybe Lions/Vikes (assuming Vikes win) but NBC did have that same game last week so maybe will want Bills instead
-
4 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:
Time Outs should be almost always saved for Offense and ball control/clock management. If you are taking a defensive time out it's because you are surprised in a mistake you shouldnt have made in the first place.
This isnt just a "criticism of McD" as much as a general rule of thumb.
Yes but when up as much as they were as late in the game as it was, not problem with taking on the defensive side either. It broke the little momentum Denver had too.
-
The other thing they did today on almost every kickoff. Bass kicked off the ball low so it first hit in the "landing zone" and then rolled into the endzone, most of the time resulting in touchbacks. But if the ball first touches in the "landing zone" and results in a touchback, the team starts on the 20 instead of the 30. Last week Bass apparently practiced this on a couple of kicks, one landed short of landing zone which resulted in team taking ball at 40. So a bit of risk/reward, but today he didn't miss on any of them.
Didn't realize this was even a rule until the 3rd quarter after the Bills FG, there was a touchback and Denver started on 20
-
1
-
1
-
Brady just interviewed with the Bears
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
I do think the Lions losing yesterday may help the Bills keep Brady. If the Lions had gone all the way to the SB, and assuming the Bills get knocked out, teams often don't want to wait that long to name their next HC so may be tempted to move to their 2nd or 3rd choice. But now both Johnson and Glenn are available though I do wonder if losing took some of their luster away from other teams desire to hire them? Good chance they both get HC jobs so that narrows down the opportunities for Brady.