NEEDFREDJACKSONNOW

I have to have a scope every year due to a longstanding medical problem that puts me at high risk for colon cancer. I pay extra for the pills, but even these gag me. I will not use the liquid plumber ever again. To put a positive spin on the whole thing, I look at scope day as my only day to get legally high. Demerol and Versed are great; you just can't remember things. One time my doctor said I sang Christmas carolls during the procedure. I also enjoy the recovery room, because they encourage you to fart to clear the colon of the air. It's like rhapsody sometimes!

FWIW..... http://www.lemondrop.com/2009/01/09/barbie...crets-revealed/

Planning to take my 7 y/o to the hockey game this Saturday....Any advice on where/how to pick up scapled tix (i.e. best time to go, any "regulars"?

Unbelieveable. How can that man still have his job after the second Jets loss. Add the poor clock management in the second Pats game, and it makes it worse. No, worse was his press conference, when he tried to justify the running play with "we ran it in practice". That's the equivalent to "my dog ate my homework"......

How about a Coaching Specialist who will call the plays under two minutes and can figure out clock management and appropriate play calling?

RW and RB doesn't know where to look to find another head coach who can win.....Really, who would even want to come here?

The Jets runblitzed. CM was so slow the play would have been like a lateral. Because the defenders were at the line and waiting for a ball carrier near the line, the play was doomed to fail even if he caught the ball. The other important factor is CM is slow and has stone hands. The reporter argued that a long downfield pass, which would have sealed the game, might have been defendable. And to an earlier poster's question if we have to rehash this, I say yes. I have a deluded fantasy that if fans complain loud enough, someone at OBD will take notice and perhaps even one more "negative" post will convince the numb brains that they have to get DJ off the field. C'mon, he said "this is one of those times in a game when it's good to pass"! No, DJ, it's NOT.

The Devil is in the details, and you are correct. This report can mean many things. Who knows? Maybe they'll make DJ Quality Control Coach for the Two-Minute Drill When You're Up By 3 Points.....

Still, after 6 games, were they worried that his price would go up if he kept winning? I wonder who made the decision to sign him. Now I know why RW is sarcastic about the Bills' future. If he had just a gleam of insight, he's probably saying "Great, I got another douchebag coach on the level of GW and MM, and mediocre talent....Now I have to eat this contract I signed 2 months ago and am out a bunch of money...." Can RW get DJ on breach of contract - making stupid decisions to lose games?

No, its the UAW.... Seriously, JP is noted for fumbling.....Will never understand the call....

Amen brother! Football 101....The percentages say a pass is riskier than a run in this instance, especially a rollout....Just pound our backs into the line....How can you put your QB in that position? OMG, they could of punted and put it on the Jets to score a TD to win.....

It's up to TS and AVP to make this work. Is TE skilled and is it bad coaching? This is AVP's first attempt at QB coaching....I think it's a combination of bad coaching and poor depth....Still can't figure why JP is still on the team, would have loved to see an older, "fatherly" vet come in to help him and give us a shot to win when TE gets hurt....Don't think GH can fill the bill here....

Isn't FJ our disaster QB? I know, it's just unbearable at times......

UNREAL. How can this be defended? Who will take responsibility for this?

Have time for some research? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#28184396 The numbers given are bullc#$p. There are other factors involved in the misleading "wage discrepancy": http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/10/business...onhardt.html?em http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/12/04/detr..._1205union.html The inquity between the banker's bailout and the auto loan is enraging: http://washingtonindependent.com/19884/fra...come-inequality http://washingtonindependent.com/21380/aut...ase-for-bailout No one here has implicated the policies of the current administration as enabling bad business practices of the domestic auto companies. There have been huge tax credits for buying large SUVs for business purposes promoted by Bush's economic team. Since this administration laughed at the idea of improving fuel standards (which the Big 3 foolishly advocated against any increases in the CAFE standards). Why build economical cars here (even though they have been successful in Europe) when I can tell my workers to buy trucks with huge profit margins?