SilverNRed

Uh huh, I like how you pretend to misinterpret what I'm saying with every post. Very effective argument tactics there. Seriously, if I had to resort to that to make my point, it'd be pretty obvious to me that it wasn't worth making.

Hey, I just wanted to know what you were driving at. As for nuclear weapons, you can argue they've saved more lives than they've ended. We haven't had anything like WWII since, well, WWII. On the other hand, we could've used non-nuclear weapons to bomb the living sh-- out of mainland Japan and probably killed at least as many people as in Hiroshima and Nagasaki - just like what the 8th AF did to Germany months earlier. And while nuclear weapons have basically halted full-scale wars between nations, they'll probably end up being the weapon of choice for small groups of radicals who aren't prone to nuclear retaliation. Unfortunately, we can't "un-invent" them at this point.

At which point, people will begin wondering why "Bush didn't do something" about it. Profiling is a wonderful thing. I'd love our security teams to be trained to look for the people most likely to be doing something sinister rather than just looking at everyone, because there's no way you can actually look at everyone. Profiling works. They understand this in Israel. It helped them crush the intifada not long ago.

Right, I would never wish for anyone to walk in her shoes. But a lot of people do. I think it's a testiment to military families that after almost 4 years of the GWOT, we've only had one mother go totally nuts and start accusing President Bush of murdering her son on national TV every night.

Why not come right out and say what you mean with that last part?

How cool would it be if Drew Rosenhaus developed an incredibly rare disease that causes you to die from violent diarrhea over 10 painful hours on the toilet? How cool would it be if he were attacked by a bear as it happened? And right before he died and went to hell, someone mailed him pictures of his wife cheating on him....with TO.

Cindy Sheehan and her roadside camp and their national TV coverage every single day on every single channel manage to blot out all of the work being done by our troops on that side of the world pretty well. Not that you expect a rounded view of what our troops are doing every day in Iraq from our media anyway..... Name one war that was considered a "rousing success" as it was going on. World War II has to be the most romanticized war you can think of these days and we had the same people saying the same things 60 years ago. "Too many people are dying. The President is an idiot. What are we fighting for?" Most people in our military support the President and support the war - they voted that way last November. Casey Sheehan re-enlisted to go back to Iraq. His mother using his name to further her nutty views - when it's clear they didn't agree politically - is just plain sick.

It IS time for her to stop acting like a nut, hack, and wacko. This isn't accomplishing ANYTHING (except possibly telling the terrorists that killing Americans gets you a lot of press back in the U.S. if they happen to have insane family members) and I imagine most of us would want our family members to go on with their lives and try to be happy if something happened to us (in war, a car accident, anything).

All you need to do is read quotes from the woman to understand that her mental health is a disaster at this point.

Actually, all of those things are currently overshadowed by the sh------- economy that drives young people out of town. A casino won't hurt. Our idiot politicians and the idiot unions that prop them up have already destroyed the city and if it's ever great again, it'll take at least a couple generations for that to happen.

The difference being that the Bush administration used propaganda for a war to being about change in the Middle East (a region that needs change like cancer patients need chemo) and Cindy is using it, whether she knows it or not, to crush the morale of our troops and country. In other word's, Cindy's propaganda is the propaganda that the terrorists like. That's an interesting way of honoring her dead son. Of course, if you follow her line of reasoning that the war was wrong and that we shouldn't be in Iraq, doesn't that make us the bad guys? So wouldn't that make the terrorists in Iraq the good guys? And wouldn't that mean she's saying the people who killed her son did the right thing? (After all, he had no right to be there and re-enlisted to go back) Just wondering. Then again, you can do the same thing with Michael Moore's "lahjik." He made a big deal about how no politicians were "sending" their kids to Iraq but doesn't think that Cindy Sheehan should be held accountable for "sending" her son to Iraq. Gosh, I thought parents were responsible for putting their kids in the military - what happened to that? Oh, but I guess in this case it was Bush's fault that Casey Sheehan re-enlisted and died in combat.

Because, retard, she doesn't even want to meet the President. She admitted that on Keith Olbermann's show last week. I posted a link to the transcript here last night. She says actually meeting him would take away her "momentum" and she's having too much fun with her three-ring circus. Meanwhile, terrorists are probably doubling their efforts to kill Americans in off-chance that one of the troops they kill will turn out to have an unhinged mommy who, in response, will do everything she can to crush morale back home. Just because this woman's son was a hero, that doesn't mean she isn't an embarassment. Good for Bush; I wouldn't meet with her anyway. At least, not until she's back on planet earth with the rest of us. EDIT: Here. These are the only words from Cindy Sheehan that you have to know.

Supposedly her husband filed for divorce, her other son wants her to come home, and just about every one of her inlaws thinks she's smearing Casey Sheehan's good name. But she is giving our retarded media something to talk about other than the missing blonde girl in Aruba.

That about sums it up. OT: Nice new avatar. Just who is that woman anyway? She's very pretty but she looks like she's straight out of the JC Penney catalogue.

The woman is unhinged - and last week on MSNBC she accidentally admitted that she really doesn't care about ever "meeting with President Bush" and she's really just putting on a show for the cameras. Later in the interview..... OOPS!!! Guess Michael Moore didn't coach her on how to answer that one. "I want to meet with him but I also don't want to meet with him so that my little circus can keep its momentum." An anti-Bush lunatic like Olbermann inadvertantly revealing Sheehan's fraudulent intentions is the best example of "friendly fire" in the media that I can recall. EDIT: Here's the LINK

The more snaps the better, I guess. As long as JP doesn't get hurt, we should play him as much as possible because he has a lot of learning to do.

You don't go to war with the army you want, you go to war with the army you have.

Don't forget Karl Rove. That A-hole.

Welcome aboard. Watch your step.

This is funny on several levels: Toronto Sun

Wowie wow wow! Good find.

You'd have to find people willing to vote him in.

The best part is that the Eagles website asked each one what their "Favorite Guilty Pleasure" is. Too bad they all said 'ice cream.' I bet it's dirtier than that. Also, I can't believe we're on page 2 of this thread and no one has slid a link of that pixie guy in here yet.