Joe Ferguson forever

Well, yes. Because musk. Apartheid was cool. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/08/africa/trump-executive-order-freeze-aid-south-africa-intl/index.html

My fav (we're professional athletes").

has anyone answered "referee"?

Nashville. Been to a few games there including the infamous one to not be named. Fun town even more fun with thousands of Bills fans running around.

that would be meaningful if he were actually deporting them faster than Biden https://www.newsweek.com/immigrant-deportations-removals-trump-biden-obama-compared-chart-2026835

yeah, when people's gas and grocery bills continue to rise, jobs get tighter and mass deportations don't actually occur, they're are going to be a few disillusioned maga's.

Which party is ok with higher taxes on ourselves if it helps desperate people? In the meantime, we’ll be forced to take the unfair tax breaks😂

ya know, I think trump and kushner inc are missing a better opportunity. Lebanon has skiing and beaches. If they didn't remove millions of Lebanese to make iresorts, might go.

Oh well. It's was like a guess with one letter on wheel of fortune. Vandy rocks I may be going myself after a prostate biopsy (ouch). Reflux can be important in laryngeal malignancies. You do realize that what they're recommending is a drug in the class of prilosec or Prevacid...

Missed the point again. glad to help. Judaism is a religion. As are Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, Afro Christian blend etc. None apparently merit a dept to stop persecution... Wow, Catturd! I concede. Hands up1 You're going to lose the house and maybe the senate 9n the midterms. 1/2 as many days...

whaddya think about Russian influence in S Africa Re the Christian issue, you missed the point. Some Christians are more equal than others. Apparently Jews are far done the equality scale. They don't need a dept to protect them from persecution.

Good question https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/why-would-a-christian-destroy-the-world-s-largest-relief-agency-opinion/ar-AA1yEl88?cvid=c4bd80ace7244b1e9976cca9fc190a87&ei=29 No. One does not. You guys never think. https://ministrywatch.com/amp/samaritans-purse-dodges-trumps-foreign-aid-freeze/

So why are fundamentalists ngo’s not targeted. I read the article. It was about attacks on “liberal” religions that support migrants. You know, like Jesus said to do.

A new department to protect Christian’s from persecution was just started. Meanwhile this https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/ar-AA1yE3N7 it’s only maga Christian s that need protection apparently

No comment @JDHillFan? You had a keen interest in before.

No reasonable person would argue against there being environmental carcinogens, many of which are due to recently developed products. That's why we need regulatory and watchdog agencies to reel them in. No reasonable person would argue against weight loss, healthy diets, exercise etc. But no reasonable person would assume that in a few hours, weeks or months they can obtain and surpass the collective knowledge of many years of science. but I'm sure you're one of a kind... btw, was I correct on your diagnosis? If so, it's not in your "throat".

With every one of these actions, people need to ask themselves "who wins?". Follow the money...For most of us, the answer is not "me". It's becoming blatantly obvious that much of the nation is comprised of imbeciles incapable of reason. oh, and btw, the guy enacting this little jewel of policy is an author of project 2025. the project trump said he had never heard of.

What a peach! He probably want mirrors on the master bedroom ceiling https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14376967/Pete-Hegseth-spars-Fox-Jennifer-Griffin-home-improvements.html

sounds like you had this: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/barretts-esophagus/diagnosis-treatment/drc-20352846. Your distrust of the med system could result in esophageal cancer. there are unethical docs. They are a small minority like the guy in Houston you championed. They are even more rare in academia because they choose to work in a setting where the pay is generally lower. Go see a doc at an academic center for a 2nd opinion on your cancer cells (Roswell?). I'll bet my house he'll tell you the same thing. Neither will benefit in any way from you taking the drug except that they'll feel better about your prognosis. What you MAGAs need to understand in all things but especially medicine is the risk/benefit concept. If the potential benefit far outweighs the risk, the intervention is very likely; worth doing. Vaccines are another great example. Re the Houston quack: If it seems too good to be true, it likely is too good to be true. These scumbags prey on desperate people with conditions that are incurable with traditional medicine. They pretend to have some knowledge (gnosis) that no one else has. They don't. Kind of like when you're cold called with an investment opportunity that is only available for a limited time from this particular broker...

See the bolded part? but it's complicated. You wouldn't understand. try to connect some dots. let me know your thoughts. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/6/2/a-russian-love-affair-why-south-africa-stays-neutral-on-war

Musk is happy. Putin's happy. For very different reasons. f your a US citizen, you should be unhappy. https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/08/africa/trump-executive-order-freeze-aid-south-africa-intl/index.html https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-trump-punishing-south-africa-110108159.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall Why should we care? https://miner.africa/2025/01/24/rare-earth-elements-in-africa-the-new-frontier-of-global-mining/

it's about being anti establishment, implying to me that they haven't done well in the existing establishment structure. but trump is going to fix that for them...let's do a "how much better off" topic in about a year and see.

this charlatan isn't Sackler level dirty money but he's in their league for sleaze. Citing examples of problems with 29 patients, which were listed in the document, the board said that "unapproved combinations of highly toxic chemotherapy" were prescribed "in ways that caused harm to several patients."[60] In July 2015, Burzynski's counsel, Richard Jaffe, withdrew from the case citing a potential conflict of interest,[61] a result of Jaffe's pursuing actions against Burzynski in bankruptcy court.[62 He claimed he was owed $250,000 in legal fees. why do you guys fall for this shite? Guys like this are trying to cheat you and everyone they can....and you admire them. It's weird. Here's an idea. If you go to Houston for cancer care, check out MD Anderson. How'd that diploma from trump U work out for you?

this guy is a peach. you really have a thing for con men. there's much more deplorable stuff on him. In 2010, Eric Merola, an art director of television commercials, released a film titled Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business, that promotes the Clinic's claims and describes Burzynski's use of antineoplastons and his legal clashes with government agencies and regulators.[97] In March 2013, Merola released a follow-up movie to Cancer is Serious Business.[citation needed] The Village Voice commented that the first movie "violates every basic rule of ethical filmmaking" and that by interviewing only Burzynski's supporters, the film's producer "is either unusually credulous, or doesn't understand the difference between a documentary and an advertisement".[98] Variety described the film as having the qualities of a "paranoid conspiracy theory" and likened it to the National Enquirer, adding that the film's explanatory diagrams are "simplistic to the point of idiocy". The Variety review concluded that "despite its infotainment look, Burzynski ultimately proves convincing."[99] In April 2013, Burzynski received the Pigasus Award, which is bestowed each April Fool's Day by the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) to "honor the five worst offenders who are intentionally or unintentionally peddling harmful paranormal and pseudoscientific nonsense."[100] The Foundation cited as the basis for the award the high cost of antineoplaston treatments, the lack of controlled trials demonstrating efficacy, the lack of FDA approval on the treatments, the lack of published final results of any single clinical trial, and the existence of FDA warning letters concerning research method safety and possible rules violations impacting patient safety. In June 2013, the BBC's Panorama explored Burzynski in a documentary titled Curing cancer or 'selling hope' to the vulnerable? and argued "Burzynski exploits a legal loophole" by treating patients with antineoplastons "as part of a clinical trial, so the drug does not need a licence" for twenty years.[101][102] The clinic complained to the Office of Communications(Ofcom) about the documentary, but the complaint was not upheld.[103] In November 2013, an investigative report in USA Today by Liz Szabo accused Burzynski of selling "false hope to families" for years.[32] In an interview with Reporting on Health, Szabo said that her interest in reporting on Burzynski was sparked when she emailed him with questions asking for a response to a book critical of him, and received a legal warning letter from his attorneys in reply.[104] In August 2015, Burzynski was listed by the Houston Press as number 8 on a list of The 10 Most Embarrassing Houstonians accusing him of being "Truly an embarrassment to such a medical city where some of the best cancer medicine in the world is performed."[105]

laughter is good for the soul. but this is getting boring.