Jump to content

ArdmoreRyno

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,609

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by ArdmoreRyno

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    49 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

    Ok how bout answer this. What are your ideas of keeping guns out of criminals hands? 


    I’ve given some of my ideas already (about 5-6). But the overall facts are, criminals will continue to steal firearms or use the ones already on the streets, illegally. 
     

    Lots of stolen weapons in the gang controlled cities already. They are passed around. 

    1 hour ago, BillStime said:

    If only there was something we could do

     

     


    Studies showed, it did NOTHING to stop school shootings. You know what has? Teachers with firearms. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    3 hours ago, aristocrat said:


    do you understand how ridiculous this is? The problem is so bad we all have to carry guns. Step back and think about that


    It’s the reality of the situation NO ONE WANTS TO ADMIT. We have a 2A, that’s not going away... we have 400 million firearms in the country, that’s not going away... we have the highest number of medicated people in the world. So let’s try to be proactive. 
     

    Ive already linked an article showing 0 school shootings where teachers are armed over the past 20+ years. It works. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    2 hours ago, BillStime said:


    Great - will flag your profile and IP for the FBI.

     

    If we are going to put bounties on women seeking an abortion - we will do the same w you nut jobs.

     

    Keep talkin bro - I hope you win 

     

     

     

    1 hour ago, BillStime said:


    You can’t think about this logically when the gun nuts have been conditioned to turn into spoiled brats if there is any discussion or regulation or controls put in place.

     

    Just look at @ArdmoreRyno’s childish response to any proposed gun law?

     

    I give zero f’ and no sympathy for these little boys who can’t get over not being GI Joe.


    Childish responses? Arm volunteers at schools, mostly front office workers. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    17 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    100%
     

    Zero need.

     

    Ask these parents and their kids:

     


    Zoom in and look at those faces.


    And you’re a fool if you think you’re going to take 25,000,000 AR platforms in the country. Most of us would never give them up. Thankfully, I don’t have to worry about that. 
     

    Then adding, most sheriffs in my area have already said they’ll never take part in ANY gun confiscation. 
     

    You want to take away them all because of the actions of a few. Brilliant. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    14 minutes ago, LDD said:

    I don't disagree.  The issue is that what you propose is VERY expensive.  People hate all over public schools as it is because they don't understand the amount of federally mandated expenditures.  What you just proposed is probably a million dollar yearly expenditure for a rural school district IF they have their physical security in shape.  Great idea if we're willing to pay for it.  


     

    It’s been reported no armed teachers at this school & there was no SRO there. 
     

    Yes, Texas teachers CAN carry but it’s up to each district. Ones who have, there’s never been a school shooting. Not in over 20 years. Seems like a damn good deterrent. 
     

    Google “armed teacher” signs. The Buffalo murderer even wrote... he assumed there would be no one carrying at the supermarket. 
     

    In this case, deterrence can work. It’s proven. 

    Just now, 716er said:

     

    Hover curser over user name and click the big Ignore button.


    Thanks! I’ll have to get on my laptop. 

    Just now, 716er said:

     

    Hover curser over user name and click the big Ignore button.

     

    7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    And supermarkets, too? 


    you keep ignore facts. Why is that? 
     

     

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted · Edited by ArdmoreRyno

    5 minutes ago, 716er said:

     

    How do you know there were no armed school martials at Copp Elementary?

     

    Last year Texas enacted a law that allows school faculty members to be designated as "armed school martials." These are teachers who take a training course and are then allowed to close carry on campus. Their identities are kept hidden. 

    5 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    SCOTUS????? lolz

     

    They already ruled abortion twice! 
     

    Another argument dead for our resident NRA gun nut.


    Since I can’t find the block button I’ll answer the resident MORON. 
     

    SCOTUS isn’t taking away abortion. Even if they rule on it again. They’d give it to the states. 
     

    You’re really this stupid aren’t you??? 
     

    BTW: I’ve never been a member of the NRA. 

    • Thank you (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, LDD said:

    I don't disagree.  The issue is that what you propose is VERY expensive.  People hate all over public schools as it is because they don't understand the amount of federally mandated expenditures.  What you just proposed is probably a million dollar yearly expenditure for a rural school district IF they have their physical security in shape.  Great idea if we're willing to pay for it.  


    We’ve sent tens of billions to Ukraine. We can find money. My school is hardened. A SRO can simply be a local officer stationed there. We had one until 2 years ago... the Chickasaw Nation (Lighthorse PD) is volunteering officers to our schools next year. No cost to us or tax payers. 


    I’m one of 3-5 veterans at the school. We’ve had this conversation and would volunteer in a heartbeat. 
     

    There ARE ways. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Demongyz said:

    Single point of entry

    Many exits with auto-locking doors

    Armed guards

    Armed staff who choose to and take course and constant training

    No more kids getting shot in school


    100% the way to stop school shootings. As an educator and counselor who works at a school with much of what you listed... this is the only feasible solution. 
     

    People thinking you raise the age or ban “AR’s” are just morons. Will never happen. SCOTUS already ruled on those very subjects. But keep harping that’s how you stop it 🙄

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    Here’s the truth of all this that no one will admit. 
     

    Cats out of the bag. 
     

    if that’s number of firearms in the country, our 2A, violent video games/movies or the problem of social media with the lack of actual connection our kids have... none of that will change. Ever. 
     

    So let’s find proven solutions now. One this is, armed teachers and staff. It’s 100% effective. 
     

     

    • Haha (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    The only 100% PROVEN effective measure? Arming teachers and/or staff and administrators. 

     

    Over the past 22 years... there has been ZERO school shootings where they are armed at a school. N-O-N-E. This was my #1 answer to the problem with school shootings. It won't address 'mass' shootings, but this is a good start. Don't give me the BS that it won't work. You're full of crap and just anti-firearms. 

     

    https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-focus-gun-control-wont-solve-any-our-problems-opinion-1710222

     

     

    • Haha (+1) 1

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

     

    there have been reports three officers engaged but did not fire at him and he just went in the school.  this keeps changing

     

    I'm just reporting what was just said by the Texas DPS director. But he made it clear, there was no SRO on the scene when he entered and started shooting. I'm sure things are fluid with information. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    2 hours ago, aristocrat said:

     

    The issue is that 1 percent is the one who are ruining innocent people's lives. Again, we already have red flag laws. I agree there are always holes but there is a saying that goes...don't let perfect be the enemy of better. We're all trying to just make it better and we realize we can't make it perfect.  We don't just throw our hands up saying well since it won't be perfect we can't do anything oh well. 

     

    Yesterday the school had an armed guard who failed to stop the guy from getting in.  I agree all schools should have them cause next time I hope the cop stops them. 

     

    All your other ideas are great.  The mental health in this country is terrible. My dad killed himself using nitrous oxide and he'd be in and out of hospitals for years with multiple attempts. I don't say ban nitrous oxide.  Other countries do the mental health e v a l for guns we should do it as looking back on all these shootings they all have that in common. Just angry kids pissed at the world and want to go out guns blazing on the easiest targets.  


    S. Texas Regional Director, Dept of Public Safety (officer) just stated that there was NOT a SRO at the school. The shooter came into an unlocked school with no officer. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted · Edited by ArdmoreRyno

    5 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    Ban 18 year olds from buying guns? 


    I just disagree with this one. Serve your country at 17 (yes, you can be 17) yet can’t own a hunting rifle. Maybe have more expectations with backgrounds for under 21 buyers?

     

    But the SCOTUS already overturned all the min 21 age limit. A legal precedent has been established. 

×
×
  • Create New...