Jump to content

ArdmoreRyno

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,608

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by ArdmoreRyno

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


    Complete utter dogcrap lies to justify a billion dollar industry.  Hairsplitting about what is and isn’t an assault rifle is yet another tired diversionary tactic of the sickos.  NOBODY in the entire country needs an assault rifle to defend their home.  Zero people.  None.  Does not exist, it’s a complete myth.

     

    The sickest thing about today’s GOP is that they’ve started to cite the prevalence of their own lies as evidence that they must be true.  
     

    “Well I’m just saying it can’t be a coincidence that so many people believe the election was stolen, there must be something to it.”

     

    This is fascism, the use of folk lies and the painting of an enemy to justify force and aggression. 


    Do you need me to provide links to articles where it’s been used to save lives? 
     

    Hey, let’s ban the one firearm that accounts for 0.01% of gun deaths. Brilliant idea 👍🏻🤦🏻‍♂️

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    1 hour ago, BillStime said:


    Ignore proof? You provided a link to back up your claims by a gun nut.

     

    You fail to ignore the proof that already exists. The good guy with a gun was killed last week at Tops and the good guys with a gun in Texas were too afraid to enter the building.

     

    You are nuts.

     

    You have already made it clear you care more about your AR-15 than human life.

     

    Karma is gonna be a bich for you.

     

     


    Screened? The kid in Texas walked in - got the gun - and left.

     

    Came back and bought another two days later.

     

    Screened? JFC


    Really? The article about the shooting in North Carolina? All the news agencies are gun nuts? lol 

     

     

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    40 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:


    Obviously not talking about soldiers and cops.

     

    Nobody in this country lives somewhere where they need an AR-15 to defend their property.  That’s a myth - one of many - created by the gun lobby and spoonfed to the GOP base which is itself constantly looking for lies and enemies to fuel its neo-fascism.

     

    The irony of proposing mental health screening for assault weapons is that anyone who enjoys collecting and shooting assault weapons is mentally broken.  If you get off on that stuff you’re mentally unfit to own it.

     

    Another NRA lie is that if you start screening gun buyers and limiting the types of weapons that can get sold you’ll soon eat away the Second Amendment altogether.  That’s a fascist myth; there have been limits on the the types of weapons one can purchase for some time now, and the Second Amendment is still going strong. If you haven’t noticed it’s hard to purchase anti-aircraft missiles, for example.


    Wrong on so many levels. I can post articles were lives were saved, even by home along teenagers, using an AR. In the town I lived in, a kid defended himself and home from 3 home invaders... with an AR. 
     

    And the AR is now a WIDELY popular hunting rifle and even more sport rifle. 400/450 rifle deaths per year (not just ‘mass shootings’, this includes suicides). So ban that. 
     

    Makes sense. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    8 hours ago, BillStime said:

    Yea let’s arm teachers - that’s the solution.


    And when a teacher kills half or all the students in her/his room - trying to take aim and kill the gunman covered in armor - then what?

     

    F that

     

     

    The good guy with a gun theory is dead


    You keep repeating this yet ignoring proof your comment is false. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    33 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    There you go ladies and gentleman - this guy is so incredibly selfish his gun is more important than the endless massacre of innocent people.

     

    1) I would give up my car in a heartbeat if I knew it would prevent a loved one from getting killed. 

     

    2) Regarding Putin - your master doesn’t have the right to invade a sovereign country and massacre people.

     

    But then again I am not surprised a Trumphole is okay with Putin destroying its neighbor and killing innocent people. It is exactly what you want to happen here.

     

    Guns over People - it’s the Republican way.

     

    sick


    YOU are the Putin lover. 
     

    And you’re an idiot beta troll. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    12 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    So ladies and gentleman - according this Mr NRA - the United States is the ONLY country on the planet that has social media, breakdown of the nuclear family, and has access to violent video games and movies… did you know that?

     

    And this guys solution is to arm our teachers with this:

     

     


    JFC 

     

    Notice it’s never about easy access to guns?

     

     

     

     


    I’m apparently a member of the NRA. Didn’t know that. Keep calling me that. 
     

    You’re the resident fan of Putin and Russian involvement in Ukraine. 
     

    And I actually think each front door should have a Ma Deuce. Those are great weapon systems. Been around for almost 100 years. Shot them a lot. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    14 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

     

    OK, so if all these illegal weapons around why don't we be proactive in stopping them from getting them?  You know the most common way they get them?  They sen someone with  a clean record to a state where it's easy to buy and then they get sold in Chicago where it's hard to buy. Why don't we come up with a way to stop that. Then slowly over time you have less and less guns as they are confiscated during crimes or thrown away after crime.  Cut off their supply chain. Cause what's happening now isn't working. 

     

    Creating more lines of defenses in schools is just not normal. This school had SRO's and this Ramos kid knew it as did the kid down in parkland. They went anyways and still got passed them cause they weren't there. Not every teacher is even able to carrry. We all thought sro's would stop it...armed cops. They still try and have succeeded.  I mean we're sending kids to schools with armor plates in their backpacks in the hopes that it saves their lives. This is not first world country stuff. 


    Dude, it’s not normal but since the dawn of social media, breakdown of the nuclear family, violent video games and movies... the norm is out the window. So you become proactive. Look at the Capitol. 1.9 BILLION to make it more secure after Jan 6. One incident and they throw BILLIONS to fix it. Harden it. 

     

    The school didn’t have a SRO there. They had them in the district but they didn’t stand watch at that school. Many focus on middle and high schools. 
     

    I never said we needed to arm “all teachers”. Go to a local school and ask how many would volunteer. At mine? At least six (every one I’ve spoke to about it) have said they would. 
     

    Let me ask you this, it continues to get passed over from people here for some strange reason: Why have schools who ARM TEACHERS/or/STAFF have a 100% success rate? Zero school shootings in 22 years of keeping track? Why????? 
     


     

     

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    49 minutes ago, aristocrat said:

    Ok how bout answer this. What are your ideas of keeping guns out of criminals hands? 


    I’ve given some of my ideas already (about 5-6). But the overall facts are, criminals will continue to steal firearms or use the ones already on the streets, illegally. 
     

    Lots of stolen weapons in the gang controlled cities already. They are passed around. 

    1 hour ago, BillStime said:

    If only there was something we could do

     

     


    Studies showed, it did NOTHING to stop school shootings. You know what has? Teachers with firearms. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    3 hours ago, aristocrat said:


    do you understand how ridiculous this is? The problem is so bad we all have to carry guns. Step back and think about that


    It’s the reality of the situation NO ONE WANTS TO ADMIT. We have a 2A, that’s not going away... we have 400 million firearms in the country, that’s not going away... we have the highest number of medicated people in the world. So let’s try to be proactive. 
     

    Ive already linked an article showing 0 school shootings where teachers are armed over the past 20+ years. It works. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    2 hours ago, BillStime said:


    Great - will flag your profile and IP for the FBI.

     

    If we are going to put bounties on women seeking an abortion - we will do the same w you nut jobs.

     

    Keep talkin bro - I hope you win 

     

     

     

    1 hour ago, BillStime said:


    You can’t think about this logically when the gun nuts have been conditioned to turn into spoiled brats if there is any discussion or regulation or controls put in place.

     

    Just look at @ArdmoreRyno’s childish response to any proposed gun law?

     

    I give zero f’ and no sympathy for these little boys who can’t get over not being GI Joe.


    Childish responses? Arm volunteers at schools, mostly front office workers. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    17 minutes ago, BillStime said:


    100%
     

    Zero need.

     

    Ask these parents and their kids:

     


    Zoom in and look at those faces.


    And you’re a fool if you think you’re going to take 25,000,000 AR platforms in the country. Most of us would never give them up. Thankfully, I don’t have to worry about that. 
     

    Then adding, most sheriffs in my area have already said they’ll never take part in ANY gun confiscation. 
     

    You want to take away them all because of the actions of a few. Brilliant. 

    What is better, no guns, or more guns?

    in Politics, Polls, and Pundits

    Posted

    14 minutes ago, LDD said:

    I don't disagree.  The issue is that what you propose is VERY expensive.  People hate all over public schools as it is because they don't understand the amount of federally mandated expenditures.  What you just proposed is probably a million dollar yearly expenditure for a rural school district IF they have their physical security in shape.  Great idea if we're willing to pay for it.  


     

    It’s been reported no armed teachers at this school & there was no SRO there. 
     

    Yes, Texas teachers CAN carry but it’s up to each district. Ones who have, there’s never been a school shooting. Not in over 20 years. Seems like a damn good deterrent. 
     

    Google “armed teacher” signs. The Buffalo murderer even wrote... he assumed there would be no one carrying at the supermarket. 
     

    In this case, deterrence can work. It’s proven. 

    Just now, 716er said:

     

    Hover curser over user name and click the big Ignore button.


    Thanks! I’ll have to get on my laptop. 

    Just now, 716er said:

     

    Hover curser over user name and click the big Ignore button.

     

    7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    And supermarkets, too? 


    you keep ignore facts. Why is that? 
     

     

×
×
  • Create New...