L Ron Burgundy
-
Posts
2,193 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by L Ron Burgundy
-
-
Anyone paying any attention to the Alex Jones trial?
Well it has been amazing if not, check it out.
How is this related? Well Alex's lawyer screwed up and gave EVERYTHING from Alex's phone to the prosecution. J6 will subpoena that info, they'v easked for it already . I'm guessing there will be some crazy stuff released between Jim and Stone soon.
-
On 8/2/2022 at 6:30 PM, Demongyz said:
What was the sentence before and after it changed?
Turned out it was just 1 sentence removed, nothing was changed.
It was 100% political theater from the right. They lied and people blindly believed them.
Stewart said, and this sounds very plausible, that Toomey pushed for the rest of his pals to block this under false pretenses and now they're pissed at him because of the blowback.
-
13 minutes ago, Buffarukus said:
no they will spin you guys up into the next we must stop them frenzy. desantis hasn't reached trump levels yet, but he's getting there just as the runner up. dont say gay!!!!??? you make them too much easy money to stop now. prepare to fight the evil overlord foor ev eerrr.
Eh, kinda like crt eh? Goes both ways.
Man I really got this thread off track. Ya'll are sensitive af.
-
4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
Personally I find him the most irritating and childish talking head on any of the networks. I get that he says nice things about the Bills and yet I still can't bring myself to like anything about him.
Cmon man he's funny! The draft speech was a riot! Enjoy the good press while we got it!!!!
- 1
- 1
- 2
-
3 minutes ago, TSOL said:
Lol!
I dont know what is more sad. That you thought that was funny or bman giving a laugh emoji. You guys are so unbelievably lame.
8 minutes ago, 716er said:So triggered he jokes about sexual assault. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
It's so not funny l laughed a bit picturing a 40 yo virgin typing it up.
I mean, the guy had a signature that said the sons of liberty if I'm not mistaken. Funny now?
-
11 minutes ago, TSOL said:
You're living in the past man
Milk was a bad choice.
If ya don't learn from the past what happens?
-
41 minutes ago, TSOL said:
The Biden administration is destroying us and perpetuating war, economic depression, and division.
And these knuckleheads are still like "remember when Trump made fun of that handicapped guy, he's the DEVIL"
You're an idiot
Awe, you triggered precious? Did I hit a sore spot?
Someone posts a pretty interesting story and your immediate reaction is to cry because they mocked your hero. Cool.
- 1
- 1
-
27 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
Funny that of the 18 groups/account listed in the OP which particular one did the neurotic obsessive-compulsive posters zero in on? Give them that ink blot test and guess what they'd see on each card? My advice to them, get professional help now!
Until he doesn't own your party it's fair game. My guess is once he finally settles into his syphilis riddled sunset the left will stop talking about him....well, eventually.
-
4 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
Because the same idiots approving burning trash for soldiers to inhale are the same idiots driving legislation that idiots applaud.
Like a typical moron… we can figure out why this actually happened later. Yep.
surrounded by idiots… dumb slow clap
ooops, almost forgot… about 3 cents per dollar of this will actually benefit those impacted..,
I really would support an IQ threshold test to screen voters.
I dont think you're right about the money being spent but time will tell. Military personnel made the decision on the pits but I get your point.
-
It went through. Good stuff. For all the bs we spend on this is actually something good.
Now I'd like to know why we were so dumb as to have these close to our troops in the first place but that's a question for another day.
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
knew you couldn’t figure out how to read the bill or the CBO review- where the facts are… 😂Ron Burgundy - extremely apropos
Well then mon frere please point it out. Should be easy no? Just a quick copy/paste.
If I'm wrong- I will admit it. It's easy (not around here but I suppose when your whole life is conspiracy maybe it's different).
-
7 hours ago, BillStime said:
The GQP playbook: when you can't win on your own merit - the GQP resorts to manufactured culture wars and propaganda.
CRT, banning books, erasing LGTBQ, pronouns, woke military... blah blah blah
It's time we just categorize them here and we will start with this coked up idiot:
This is true but I do wish the left would ease up on some stuff. We have to be able to attract some conservatives to vote blue. We lose potential voters pushing for change a lot aren't ready for.
-
52 minutes ago, 716er said:
What specific text from the bill does @Over 29 years of fanhood take issue with?
Nothing. @Doc Brown summed it perfectly earlier in this thread. Reps voted for it before then 1 sentence was amended that changed virtually nothing.
This is all games from the right (this time, the left certainly plays their games too).
Another wonderful example of monkeys throwing crap at the wall plus misinformation.
-
41 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
Reading isn’t for everyone
pork, is money not being used for what the bills says it’s for. Why is this so hard for you. I pay a Schitt ton of taxes and don’t like to see it wasted.
READ THE BILL AND CBO REPORT or STFU.
stop listening to what Don Lemmon and tucker Carlson tell you to think and try thinking for yourself…
geeze it’s like arguing with a 4 year old.
You've got nothing.
The right look like jokers here for voting this down for nonsense then lying about it.
You defined discretionary for me earlier can you define hypocrisy? I'm thinking that may apply to someone that says think for yourself but blindly gargles Ted Cruz's sack. But define it for me so I can be sure.
We shouldn't just blindly give money for anything, even vets, but our military's dumb decision messed these people up we should probably help them now.
-
I don't like this. Russia is putting more blame on us for helping Ukraine, who knows if it's true, and now we're stirring the pot with China. The last thing we need is conflict with both of them at once.
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
I read most of the bill and all of the cbo report. I ‘Thinks’ you want to believe what you want- that’s on you.
The folks trying to steal more of our money using veterans health as a Trojan horse are just and bad as the ones resisting it. Go look at how much Bureaucratic baggage this burn pit issue has carried along with it for the past couple years and all the surrounding partisan shenanigans. Now all of the sudden it’s urgent?? 😂
if you think more than 10% of this money will go to vets health you refuse to understand how this dc clown show works.
Ah so now the pork is gone and it's just your opinion that the money won't be used as should.
Aka, you were wrong. The discretionary piece was wanted, in Cruz's own words, by Republicans.
We need at least to be able to agree on facts. There was no other spending in the bill, if you read it then you know that. What will happen later I don't know, I haven't commented on that. Some here are very quick to jump on misinformation from Twitter, blast it out on the forum, where the sheep then jump on it as fact.
If I am wrong feel free to point out what money will not go to vets in there.
-
5 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
Sure, it’s much more likely a handful of politicians just wanted the awesome publicity of voting against veterans healthcare!?! 😂They deliberately don’t make it easy to read, but CBO sure seems to think there are hundreds of billions of “discretionary” money.
discretionary
dĭ-skrĕsh′ə-nĕr″ē
adjective
Left to or regulated by one's own discretion or judgment.
Available for use as needed or desired.
Available at one's discretion; able to be used as one chooses; left to or regulated by one's own discretion or judgment.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3967
related to vets… lol…. Buy a Ferrari then drive by the WW2 monument (now it’s related to vets)
Me thinks you are incorrect. Ted wants the funding as discretionary not mandatory. Watch the videos pal.
It was payback. The political theater is coming from the right this time. Also just because something is discretionary doesn't mean it won't go to vets. We overspend all the time this is one area I don't mind.
The fist bumps were cool though.
- 1
- 1
-
11 hours ago, B-Man said:
They blocked $400 billion in spending not related to vets. Good for them.
This bill had a lot of pork and very little to help veterans. Democrats should be ashamed.
This is a complete lie. Nothing was in the bill not related to vets. Reps are just backtracking because of the blowback.
- 1
-
2 hours ago, BillStime said:
Poor fella - f’d around and found out.
Reffitt’s daughter’s are 100% correct.
You should have said "poor guy".
I'm here to help!
-
I mean, we may not who knows? New oc is a huge question mark.
However, we play like we did in the playoffs we should be just fine.
- 1
-
Awe big bummer. Hopefully nothing crazy going on.
-
-
10 hours ago, BillStime said:
Imagine if this were happening to the left how many conspiracies there'd be already just based on missing info. Meanwhile the more sane people are simply seeking the truth.
-
7 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:
One problem is this. The people cheating in key Democrat controlled districts in several swing States, in general delivering just enough fake mail-in ballots to win the Statewide race, are the same local election officials and party members assigned the responsibility to manage the election process and ensure the vote is fair. Producing proof through auditing the vote counts require the cooperation of those people. In order for any audit to be performed the people cheating must be willing to assist in activities that will implicate them in cheating. How exactly would that work? Maybe we need United Nations observers at polling places to ensure the vote is fair like they do in places like Zimbabwe?
Perfect example of moving the goal posts.
Let's do a recount!
Then when you don't get the desired outcome you just make up a reasonable reason why you didn't get your way. Accept it. The election had the usual amount of fraud. Should it be zero? Sure.
The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Uhhh they were supposed to vet what they sent. Only stuff related to the trial. They didn't and sent everything on the phone. They asked to be able to mark things confidential now but that should have happened loooong ago. Can't wait to find out what crazy stuff Jones and Stone spoke about re JN 6.
He's the definition of a pathological liar.
And he has a huge base. Which is why I find it hilarious when conservatives say the left shifted to the extreme. He's a big part of the problem in our country.