Jump to content

Billl

Community Member
  • Posts

    2,875
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Billl

  1. 27 minutes ago, Logic said:


    What Reddick has over Huff is that he's been good for a longer period of time. Double digit sacks in four straight seasons.

    But Huff had a career year last year and seems to be blossoming into an imposing pass rusher himself.

    As I pointed out in my post, they two players had an identical 22% pass rush win rate last year.

    As I also pointed out in my thread, Huff had just 1 less sack than Reddick, but on 289 less attempts. That's significant.

    So yes, I'm suggesting that what Huff became last year may be roughly equal to what Reddick is now. I admit that Reddick has the proven longevity factor that Huff lacks, and perhaps you're insinuating that Huff's 2023 success was a flash in the pan, not likely to be duplicated.

    Me? I'll take the 25 year old and the 2nd round pick over the 29 year old and the lack of that pick. YMMV.

     

    Huff might be better three years from now and it may put NY in a worse draft and cap position three year from now, but the Jets aren’t trying to win three years from now.  They’re all in right now, and Reddick is a much better player today.  Huff had a career year from a sack standpoint, but Reddick still had more while being a much better overall player.  I’m not a huge believer in “approximate value” metrics, but Reddick was an 8 last year, and Huff was a 2.  The year before, Reddick was a 15, and Huff was a 1.  

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/H/HuffBr00.htm

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/ReddHa00.htm

     

    That said, I don’t really disagree with anything you said up until the ‘Douglas loss, Howie win’ part.  Philly’s been to two Superbowls and won one in the last 6 years. They’re trying to build for the long-term.  The Jets don’t have that luxury.  They’re taking a rifle shot at winning now.  This “trade” furthers both of their interests, IMO.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 2
  2. 1 hour ago, Logic said:

    As I just saw pointed out on Twitter:

    Yes, the Jets got 29 year old Reddick, but they LOST 25 year old Bryce Huff who is coming off a career year with 10 sacks.

    Reddick and Huff had an identical 22% pass rush win rate last year. Huff had one less sack on 289 (!) less rushes.

    So the Eagles got the younger, arguably equally productive player by signing Huff, then turned around and took advantage of the Jets' sudden need for a pass rusher by trading them the older Reddick and getting a 2nd round pick and $10 million in cap space in return.

    So the Jets added a good player in Reddick, yes, but its arguably a wash with having lost Huff, but they got older and gave up a premium pick to do it.

    Howie Roseman win, Joe Douglas loss.

    You’re really trying to pretend that Bryce Huff is as good as Haasan Reddick?

    • Eyeroll 1
  3. 3 hours ago, Yantha said:

    It's a fair point but you can't sign a probowl center.  They all have jobs with other teams at this point.

    Kansas City has an all Pro center playing on the last year of his rookie contract. They’ve also got Trey Smith and Nick Bolton who are up for new contracts after this season as well. I don’t think they can sign all three of them. 
     

    Buffalo has a need at Center and is without a third round pick. Creed and a third round in exchange for Buffalo’s first would be an interesting option, IMO.

  4. 1 minute ago, gonzo1105 said:


    Kincaid wasn’t a raw prospect, he was a polished product. While he’s athletic, you couldn’t classify Kincaid as an athletic freak because he never tested during the pre draft process due to his back injury 

    That’s not accurate at all in terms of bing a polished product.  A huge part of his draw was the fact that he was raw since he didn’t start playing football until his senior year of high school.

  5. 3 hours ago, gonzo1105 said:

    I would disagree with this only because Allen was 21, Edmunds was 20, Rousseau was 20, Oliver 21, Elam 20. When Beane takes athletic profiles in round 1 he does it when they’re extremely young. He has never take a 23 year old raw prospect.

    He traded up to get Kincaid just last year who turned 24 shortly after the start of the season.  He’s about the same age as Gabe Davis.

    • Like (+1) 1
  6. 23 hours ago, Nephilim17 said:

    If, for example, they love Legette, and they're confident they can get him (and KC won't) by trading back a handful of spots, OK.

    But I wouldn't get cute if they really like a guy and he's available at 28. If they don't really like a guy, sure.

    Given that Kansas City has jumped them the past two years and come away with Trent McDuffie and Rashee Rice, I’m not sure that trading back behind the Chiefs this year is a great strategy.

    • Agree 1
  7. 6 minutes ago, Paup 1995MVP said:

    Why not?  Their fans are a bunch of obnoxious hicks from the middle of nowhere.  They have had their glory.

     

    Didn't Gordon Gecko say that "Greed is good" in the movie Wall street?  LOL   

     

     

    Why not?  Their fans are a bunch of obnoxious hicks from the middle of nowhere.  They have had their glory.

     

    Didn't Gordon Gecko say that "Greed is good" in the movie Wall street?  LOL   

     

     

    Why not?  Their fans are a bunch of obnoxious hicks from the middle of nowhere.  They have had their glory.

     

    Didn't Gordon Gecko say that "Greed is good" in the movie Wall street?  LOL   

     

     

    Congrats on finally getting Internet access in upstate NY.  You'll get better once you figure it out.

    • Haha (+1) 1
  8. 14 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:


    I’d say they like him as a “high floor” player. Meaning they believe he could at least start at multiple positions if need be. Ideally he’s the 3rd safety and will see the field during certain situations
     

    Yes, he may end up starting if we don’t add anyone else.  That’s fine. He made some huge plays late in the season

    His value is his versatility.  He's not great at any specific role, but you can use him anywhere.  He can play deep safety, box, and even slot corner without being a liability.  IMO, he's the best overall Safety on the roster.  Still think Beane adds a definitive starter, though.

  9. The biggest need on the team, IMO is a pass rusher.  Floyd led the team with 10.5, and he's gone.  Oliver had 9.5, but that was a massive outlier for him.  He had 9.5 in his previous three seasons combined.  I think his number decreases a bit next year, and maybe Von gets a couple to make up the difference.  That puts a lot of pressure on guys like Rousseau and Epenesa who have yet to really prove themselves as pass rushers.

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. 19 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

     

    OK, so "usually" = last 6 years.  Got it.

     

    Just realize that another way to look at it is Mahomes has won 50%, which is a coin toss.  Now of course, getting the chance to flip that coin, is outstanding.  But I do kind of wonder if KC might be getting a little full of themselves.

    I suppose if you choose to ignore the part of my post where I used an 8 year window and a ten year window and then also choose to ignore the part about Brady then my post didn't make as much sense.  

  11. 27 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

     

    Except of course for Brady's 7 superbowl or conference losses, and of course, since Mahomes was drafted Chiefs have 3 SB wins and 3 SB or conf. losses.

     

    So, what does "usually" mean to you?

    Depends how you want to want to measure it, 5 of the last 6 have been won by Mahomes or Brady.  That counts as "usually" to me.  Granted, that's a bit of a cherry picked window, so you could go with the last decade which would be 7 out of 10 which would also qualify.  Then again, a few of those years were before Mahomes was even in the league.  Since he was drafted in 2017, it would be 6 out of 8.  During that stretch, Brady has won 3, Mahomes has won 3, and all other QBs combined have won 2.

     

    So, yeah.  The Superbowl is usually won by the team with either Mahomes or Brady.

    • Agree 1
  12. 42 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:


    Reminds me of what people said when Poyer signed here …

     

    Interesting…The Chiefs paid him $3m last year … did they overpay him?

     

    I don’t think they were complaining when the SB came around…

    We definitely weren’t complaining.  $3 million was a good deal.  Given the state of the FA Safety market right now, I’m guessing Buffalo got him for that or less which is a solid deal.  If you’re expecting a high end backup or lower end but serviceable starter, you’re going to be happy.  If you’re expecting him to be peak Jordan Poyer they you’re going to be disappointed.

    • Like (+1) 1
  13. 51 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    I think Edwards is a starter based on our current roster. But he is a low end starter. I am worried about the safety position.

     

    That’s exactly what he is.  He wasn’t particularly good when he had to start, but he wasn’t a liability and that’s all you can ask from a backup.  I would be pretty surprised if both he and Rapp were first string next year.  They’re both the type of player who you can get by with if the rest of the defensive backfield is solid, but neither are really plus players.  Good signing assuming he’s in the $2 million range for sure.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  14. 4 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:

    there is just some logic on topics you cant argue with because it makes that much less sense. 

    And saying that a second team All Pro player who just got $20 million a year is nowhere near starting caliber is one of them.  That’s your statement, not mine.  Not only is he not great, and not only his he not good, and not only is he not average, and not only is he not even below average, and not only is he not a solid backup…he’s nowhere near starting caliber.  

     

    What other all pros from last season are nowhere near starting caliber, in your view?

    • Vomit 1
×
×
  • Create New...