Bruffalo
-
Posts
1,756 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Bruffalo
-
-
I like him for very cheap, like cheaper than Sanders cheap.
-
I'd love to keep Edmunds around but not for the price he's going to command on the open market. If you could get him on the Milano deal + inflation it's a no brainer, for 17-20 mil a year, no thanks, best of luck to him though.
Poyer is whatever. He's been great, and he's excellent when healthy, but that healthy designation is getting less and less likely as his career goes on.
-
Nobody ever says they want a softer defense.
-
1
-
-
Probably an unpopular opinion: With all of the injury concerns he showed this season combined with his age I think it's better to let him walk.
-
2
-
6
-
-
Obscenely rich people doing whatever they want? Even if it's fraudulent? Say it ain't so.
Every billionaire has done tons plenty of immoral and unscrupulous things to get there. It's unfortunate that we reward this behavior.
Screw Goodell though, hope he burns down with the Snyder ship.
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, FireChans said:
10 points.
dorsey should also take some time
I'm not happy with Dorsey either but there's a pretty big difference in an OC that's going into year 2 of his career as a coordinator vs Frazier who has been a DC/HC for over 15 years.
What you see with Frazier is what you're going to get. He's not going to start shaking it all up in his 60s. Dorsey can still pivot and improve this early into his career.
-
Just now, Sargent Hulka said:
How do you entice a qualified replacement if Frazier is just taking a one year hiatus? This excuse sounds contrived.
Frazier is taking a 1 year hiatus from coaching. He plans to return to coaching next year, that doesn't mean he will return to be the DC of the Bills.
-
2
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, PrimeTime101 said:
not a fan.
Just trying to be realistic. It's pretty late in the process to hire from the outside.
-
1
-
-
Just now, John from Riverside said:
There is nothing to say that that would happen
You're absolutely right, but like they say "The definition of madness is trying the same thing over and over and expecting different results".
I don't think Frazier was horrible, but a change is needed. He never performed well in the post-season. Our post-season success is Allen going superman on teams, and herculean efforts by individual players (Taron Johnson's 98 yard pick six).
Frazier turtled in the big moments. I feel like we need somebody a bit more bold.-
1
-
3
-
-
1 minute ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:
People thinking the next DC will be able to stop the Chiefs are in for a rude awakening.
If he can stop them in situational football like 13 seconds then it'll be an upgrade.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, thenorthremembers said:
This board is hilarious. Guy gets his team in the top 10 for all but one year he is here and you guys automatically think the next guy will be better. Grass isnt always greener.
I'll take a slide down in the regular season if it means better post-season performance with better situational playcalling when it matters.
-
2
-
-
Have to hire within probably at this point. I just want somebody who can be a bit more aggressive and mix it up more. The scheme is okay, situational playcalling is what felt really questionable to me.
-
7
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, appoo said:
I mean you guys are giving Frazier way too much blame and not nearly enough to Brandon Beane. No one forced the Bills to be in the loaded QB conference with an entire secondary of sub 4.5-4.6 players, and have exactly one drafted plus DE over the last 5 years in Groot.
Ftazier can only the personnel he’s given and that personell grouping was hugely flawed and Frazier probably had them playing above their athletic talent levels for vast majority of the last 3 years.
Like the lack of pro bowl nods isn’t necessarily a lack of respect. It’s also an acknowledgment of the level of physical talent this team has on defense.
So I guess be careful for what you wish for, because you might just get it
Yeah, I heard Beane only drafts guys to stand back 10-12 yards when the other team needs 5.
The DC wasn't putting his players in positions to be effective during critical downs. You can argue that the players are subpar, but they were basically put in situations that were doomed from the get go.
-
2
-
-
This late in the game I got to think that they're hiring someone internally to replace him. If they can be more aggressive in key moments then the scheme should be fine. Fraizer was too passive and it showed against good teams.
Let's get someone hungry in there to prove themselves.
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, benderbender said:
Just a reminder that the Browns gave Watson a $230 Million guaranteed contract. It happened. Any QB who doesn’t ask for at least that afterwards is admitting he doesn’t bring as much to the table as a 25 time accused sexual assaulter. So Kyler Murray. Lamar thinks more of himself than Kyler Murray.
Now that the XFL isn’t a tour de force and March Madness is too far away, the media wants to pick up old stories and refurbish them for content about Lamar.
The Browns definitely screwed up the market (and hopefully themselves) by signing that serial abuser. I don't think you can possibly make that deal for Lamar though given the way he plays and the injury potential.
It's a tough pill to swallow, but I think you have to let him walk. -
1 minute ago, Jrb1979 said:
Sure it's an upgrade to Highmark but that's not saying much.
My point is that if you look at the new stadiums and upgrades stadiums and arenas around the country are doing, they almost all have things in common. They all are adding things to make the stadium experience better then what you get if you watched the game sitting at home.
A good example is the Rogers Centre in Toronto. Before the major upgrades this offseason I rarely went to a game. I would drive 3 hours to see a game in Cleveland before seeing a game in Toronto. Now with the upgrades and the new amenities and food offerings I am looking forward to seeing a game there.
I know most here could care less about that stuff but the people here aren't your average fan.
The standing area section sounds promising to me. I like the idea of getting some wings, a beer, and watching the game from that vantage.
-
1
-
-
Well I think it looks neat. I hope the food options are better.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Dr. Who said:
I agree that it is not implausible that Dorsey can grow into the position. I'm not sure Dorsey's aggression, however, is a good match with Josh who is also naturally aggressive. I sure don't want to take that out of Josh's DNA, but someone has to moderate that quality and repeatedly impress upon the franchise qb that taking the quick hitters and check downs can also be lethal ways to attack.
That's a valid concern for sure. I can't say we'll know for sure one way or the other until next season.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:
What I find funny is that a lot of people will complain about the lack of talent on offense and how bad our offensive line is. I'm included.
With this lack of talent and bad offensive line...we were 3rd in scoring. I had my issues with Dorsey as well but a lot of it was player execution.
I'm not worried about Dorsey, I'm more worried about Frazier.
This is how I feel too. Frazier has already peaked, I don't think he's capable of pivoting into being a more aggressive coach at this point in his career.
Dorsey at least has potential, and if anything he's too aggressive. That's much better than being too timid.
-
2
-
-
I'm not happy with Dorsey but I can understand why he did what he did.
Nobody, and I mean nobody, took a step forward this season on offense. Crowder went down early, McKenzie blew his opportunity. Gabe Davis didn't show enough to be the #2 the org wanted him to be. Diggs was fantastic, but he can only do so much when the defense is just focused on shutting him down. The O-Line was horrifying, I don't think I've seen worse guard play this season. The RBs were getting touched at the handoff. Spencer Brown gets beat easily for being a big athletic guy.
It was just rough. Allen hides so many of the warts, he's one of the top 3 most dynamic players in the league. We need to invest in him and around him, because without Allen this team would be dead in the water.
-
8
-
1
-
6
-
-
1 hour ago, 78thealltimegreat said:
Why not? You don’t think he’s going to get better let’s trade him look Lamar is going to fetch 2 ones imagine what Josh would get
That would be a steal. He's worth more than the Watson trade.
-
Sometimes we should just not type out the thoughts in our head.
-
2
-
1
-
6
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, pocoboy said:
Here's the reality for us - the NFL now views the Chiefs as their new Patriots. It's not going to change until Mahomes retires. They will use every resource in their power to enable them. Period.
I am wondering if we're going to be Rivers and the Chargers at this point. It's not looking good.
I would have loved to be the Chargers during the drought years.
Allen is better than Rivers was by a mile. The problem is our coaching staff is living 20 years in the past and trying to win on the back of a bloated defense instead of investing in the guy who is actually making them look good.-
2
-
-
8 hours ago, Boatdrinks said:
He wasn’t a rookie. Just a guy who was always injured and didn’t show much as a result.
Sure, and what you're saying makes it worse. They had multiple years to see the talent in this guy and they even had him on the field where he produced with limited reps, and they still got rid of him.
the McD coaching staff is awful at making depth chart changes. Maybe comically bad. The poor use of our rookies isn't because we just draft bad. It's because we don't give them the chance to develop in real game scenarios.
-
1
-
Diggs unfollows Buffalo, follows Cowgirls 🤷♂️
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
"Outside of his good games he's bad." is one way to argue, I guess.