Ya Digg?
-
Posts
2,607 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Ya Digg?
-
-
3 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:
Just don’t think the ‘Phins will be looking to trade players to the Bills.
I go back and forth on in division trades-if the Bills offer the best trade they st least have to consider it, right? Have to think about your own team first, the team you’re trading with has to be a distant 2nd
-
1
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:
No. He outplayed Allen.
Uhhhhhh what?? Probably time to stop drinking
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:
I think in today’s game it is about the Bills offense. The defense is what it is - it’s mediocre and can’t be changed much this season. Our best player happens to be the QB, so this game and season is about how many points they can score. Big picture the defense has been at the center of their playoff exits.
I’m actually looking at the defense optimistically today. Hoecht, Milano, Hairston, Bernard could all be a big boost for them today
-
I know you’re talking about more than just this latest trade, but in no way, shape, or form does Jaire Alexander make the Eagles any better. I’d the Bills had traded for him there would be a thread 25 pages long talking about how terrible that move was
-
58 minutes ago, BlueRed said:
You can tell the Bills think about the Chiefs all year round. I think they have a Chiefs specific playbook they’ll tap into today to make sure the offense is humming and converting TD’s instead of FG’s!
I think the Bills pull out a win in a tight back-and-forth game!
Honest question, but what have they shown at all that makes you think the Bills think about the Chiefs year round? I don’t hear the team talk about them unless asked, haven’t seen or heard anything from this week that said they were putting in extra time/effort. How do they show it? Or is it assumed because us fans obsess over the Chiefs year round?
-
2 hours ago, todd said:
Josh is supposed to sit and concentrate 24-7 on the upcoming game. No breaks, no family, just practice, eating, and the next game.
because humans are only able to focus on one thing at a time, and god forbid have work/life balance or maybe a bit of fun.
No, eating takes away from practice and film watching. Just hook up an IV and a catheter so then he never loses focus!
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, Billsfanatic8989 said:
I can deal with a loss if there are signs of life/improvement from the offense and defense. That is most important. I expect the Bills to win the division and compete for the 1 seed regardless of Sunday's outcome.
The problem is if they lose there are too many people on here who will say that didn’t happen, even if the Bills lose 3-0. Hell, the Bills put up 40 and most of the talk this week was how terrible the offense is and it only happened because of Dalton and the Panthers aren’t very good
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Pete said:
Aggressive stupidity I call it. When someone yells angrily and is completely wrong
That’s weird, isn’t that the same definition for the game day thread or the Monday after a loss?
-
They’re good, but they’re aren’t “effing good”
This isn’t to say they won’t win the division with that schedule (although I VERY HIGHLY doubt that) but they have some losses left on that schedule. They’re still a young team learning to win. Maye is going to make mistakes, their offensive weapons aren’t great, and up to this point they have been very lucky with regards to injuries.
is this a bias opinion? Absolutely-but there’s also a lot of truth in there too
-
1
-
-
Just now, Julio Hopkins said:
This game is tied at best if Bryce Young is playing today
I love you people like this, y’all are just the cutest
-
1
-
-
On 10/24/2025 at 11:35 AM, KentuckyBillsFan said:
Shadow benching.
It's 2025 and Jordan Poyer and Cole Bishop are the starting safeties. Just a complete failure of team building at this position.
So a 2nd round pick starting in his 2nd year is a complete failure, got it. Not even lying, I LOVE the irrational reactions people have on here
-
26 minutes ago, That's No Moon said:
I'm struggling to find good vibes about the rest of this season. I can abide a lot but a bad defense is not one of those things. Our defense stinks on ice and I don't see how it improves. Without massive massive improvement this entire season is a waste because they won't win anything playing this sort of defense. Playoffs maybe, hooray. Nothing important.
Just wondering-were you saying this a couple of weeks ago? If not, what changed?
I ask because nothing has changed besides a couple of losses. In fact the team is now better because of the defensive replacements
statements like this is why fans aren’t in a team’s front office
-
1
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, billsherd said:
I'm not sure if McD would put them in first week back if they have not practice for last six weeks.
Oh I’m pretty sure they’ll be out there. Even after 6 weeks of no practice, how could they not be better than what we have seen lately?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, T.E. said:
They've been here before - having weeks at a time where they looked terrible - but what's concerning is that in past seasons when this happened, it was obvious that they were just underachieving.
This team, on the other hand, looks like they are just bad. The roster outside of a few guys seems awful.
So here's the issue with your statement - this is a hindsight look. The same doom and gloom was being said during those stretches in the past. No one was saying "oh well these teams are just consistently underachieving" there were tons of threads of this team is terrible, they won't make the playoffs, the roster outside of a few guys seems awful, blah blah blah
In the moment, the days and week after a loss it's always the same around here. They have shown in the past they can turn it around, so I have reason to believe they will figure it out again
-
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:
Better hope this team wins games so their game v NE matters.
It’s one of maybe 3 losses (including us now in a must win) I see on their schedule.
As in 3 more losses or 3 losses total for the season?
-
3 minutes ago, Steptide said:
Welp, time for the Jackson Hawes game
If you mean hopefully no more than 1 or 2 targets then yes, I agree with you. Any more than that and the team is in serious trouble
-
3 minutes ago, BVBILLS said:
This is not acceptable. You have a unicorn at QB in his prime, and you can't even field a moderately good defense. I thought our coach is a defensive genius? Also, why do DTs like Ford and Settle do so well elsewhere? The Bean / Mc Clappy combo is failing us, and Josh.
Those 2 have a combined 13 tackles and 1 sack this season-yeah, they’re really crushing it
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, Casey D said:
Maybe we can get McDaniel to replace McDermott. Great offensive mind and we can get a new defensive scheme. All this culture stuff is overrated anyway. Imagine what he could do with Allen.
Are you serious or is this sarcasm??
-
2
-
-
45 minutes ago, Einstein said:
I think you missed the context of the discussion you butted into.
The discussion wasn’t “should we fire Beane?” - I have been clear on my stance that no one from the current regime should go.
The discussion was whether a GM deserves blame for selecting the wrong player. That’s it! That’s all of it. Nothing else. And YES - a GM should absolutely shoulder blame for selecting the wrong player, even if others thought the player he selected was the better choice.
They are paid to know the future.
By your definition of a GM (just doing what everyone thinks is the right decision), we could simply fire the GM and scouting staff and simply select draft picks based on the average consensus of prognosticators.
This is my last comment to this, because your comments are just not making any sort of logical argument. They are not paid to know the future-that’s idiotic. They are trying to make predictions with the information they currently have. By your logic, teams should have known to take Brady #1 overall, the Browns would e taken Josh #1, and the Bills should’ve predicted that Vin would tear his ACL 8 games into his first season here. They’re paid to KNOW the future, right?
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
8 minutes ago, Einstein said:
A general managers job is to know what will happens before it happens!!!
That is LITERALLY their job.Should we have kept Doug Whaley or Buddy Knox because “aw shucks, can’t use hindsight against them!”
No!
The point is there was no one who thought that Laporta was going to be the better pro. If they did, he would’ve been the pick-simple as that. They are making their picks with the information and film they have. The information and film they had at the time, and that every other team had at the time, was that Kincaid was going to be better. This means they are LITERALLY doing their job. So until teams have someone who can see the future, that’s how teams have to handle the draft
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 months, it’s still 2 months away
-
4
-
-
23 minutes ago, Einstein said:
Why *ever* fire a GM then? Just say “eh, he couldn’t know which player would have been better”.
If the GM can just blame his poor picks on who the prognosticators believe will be the better player (which was the persons comment I replied to), then there is no point in having a GM.
So what?
Part of a GM’s job is to know who will be better. Not just say “well everyone else also though X was going to be better”.
You’re using hindsight as the main component of your argument, which negates everything you’re saying
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Einstein said:
This argument doesn't hold water.
Its the PRO scouts and GM's literal job to know who will be better.What doesn’t hold water? Kincaid was universally seen as the better prospect
-
1
-
-
I gotta admit, I love this place after a Bills loss, it really does help remind me I’m not crazy! I used to hate coming here after a loss, but the insane, asinine jumps off a cliff are so incredibly entertaining.
The best part is this thread wasn’t even created after a loss! I’m so happy it’s back though, keep it up OP, you’re doing the lords work right now
3 up 3 down week 9
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
I completely disagree with having Davis play over those 2 guys. Gabe should play because of injuries only, not because of performance. People forget all of the drops, miscommunication, and interceptions that happened on balls targeted to Davis