JoPoy88

I’d assume they definitely have to bring a few guys in for a look-see at least.

very well could be true - just going off the plaintiff’s complaint as that’s the only thing down on paper at this point.

it was some room in his residence. I assume he had housemates so who knows.

not a problem it’s already a massive thread I get it

one more time for the peeps in the back: “Law enforcement personnel are allowed to legally record conversations that they are not a party to. Police officers may then legally use this evidence for criminal prosecutions. Private citizens are also allowed to utilize these exceptions in a much more limited capacity. In order to use this exception 2 circumstances must be met: The person recording must be a part of the conversation, this essentially changes California law from an all-party consent state into a single-party consent state, [and,] They must be recording conversations in order to gather evidence that the other party committed one of the following crime: Extortion, kidnapping, bribery, harassing phone calls, or any felony involving violence against another person. This allows you to record conversations in most instances where you feel threatened.” exceptions to every law…

1. there is no consent in “consensual” sex if the victim is too intoxicated. 2. There is no consent defense in cases of statutory rape.

that’s right. There’s also this: “Private citizens are also allowed to utilize these exceptions in a much more limited capacity. In order to use this exception 2 circumstances must be met: The person recording must be a part of the conversation, this essentially changes California law from an all-party consent state into a single-party consent state. They must be recording conversations in order to gather evidence that the other party committed one of the following crime: Extortion, kidnapping, bribery, harassing phone calls, or any felony involving violence against another person. This allows you to record conversations in most instances where you feel threatened.”

there are exceptions to 2-party consent. Guess what one of them is?

It says that act happened outside and she was then brought inside to a room everything else happened and she claims she lost consciousness.

possibly. It’s also possible (and suggested in the LA Times article) that the SDPD waited quite a while before giving the school the okay to thoroughly investigate, lest they interfere with the criminal investigation.

there was an the findings were recently submitted to the DA. Might want to read the article.

Should absolutely be suspended, probably won’t be.

I think it’s going to look pretty similar to one of those yes.

the wasteland that is reality TV has something for just about anyone looking to shed a few IQ points.

because they’re badly managed, from the owner on down. Grier and McDaniel either not on the same page, or McDaniel thought he could just show up off the plane and mold guys to the roles he expected them to play without considering that they’d be very bad at those roles.

Ross is cheap?

Rex heard race and assumed it had something to do with feet

You’re certainly stirring something. So basically this is just BS trolling - you’ve no interest in engaging or debating this topic, your little ego just wants to count up the emojis and responses you get. Great.

I’m sorry but does @FireChans ever even come back to these **** topics he starts or is that his MO? Far as I can tell it is; why entertain this BS, even in the “offseason”?

the highlighted is all you need to know for next time - dude just add on to the other von miller-OBJ threads. Is it that hard to click a magnifying glass? edit: see? It was merged with the relevant thread. You coulda skipped that step. Easily

We doing new threads for every single tweet on this now?

Seems like more of a random musing but sure, it’s a little odd.

Even if it were a remotely good idea, doesn’t appear they have the room for that against the cap.

good argument

Glad to get anything in return for him at this point.