Jump to content

VW82

Community Member
  • Posts

    1,794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by VW82

  1. 13 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

     

    I can almost feel the outrage.

     

    7/10, would read again.

     

     

    Second half thread got locked, but to answer your question...No I don't think this team is going anywhere this year, but you need a team to win. There is no team if guys all lose faith in the process because the QB is sometimes beyond terrible to the point where you can't trust him. Games like this one contribute to that. They've now seen first hand just how ugly it can get with Josh under center. 

     

    This can't happen again, or at least not in the manner it did. This has to be the low point for him. I said the same thing about Peterman when he threw five picks, and this game wasn't much better. The second time Peterman tanked a game his career was over. You just can't do your teammates like that, regardless of what position you play or where you were drafted.  

     

  2. Just now, joesixpack said:

     

    :lol:

     

    I'm gonna step out on a limb here and guess you wanted Rosen durning the draft.

     

     

    No. I was hoping and praying Baker or Darnold would fall to us. After they didn't I would have just kept the picks. I might have taken Lamar Jackson with our late first. 

     

    That said, we took Allen and I'm happy to support him. This performance is unsupportable though. He has to be better than this. It can't be a case where we completely tank games in the name of his development.  

  3. Just now, joesixpack said:

     

     

    HE didn't. THEY ALL did.

     

    Receivers not catching, line not blocking, RB not running. It was a total team failure.

     

     

    Sure there's blame to go around, but Allen was by far the biggest offender out there. We couldn't even move the ball. He was missing protections. Missing free rushers. Bad pocket presence, running backwards into sacks. Air mailing receivers. Unable to identify open receivers. Both INTs were his fault.

     

    It was a really, really bad day for him. The fact his floor can be that low is disconcerting.    

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 5 minutes ago, joesixpack said:

     

    Yeah, it really kind of is. That is, if you stop for a moment and attempt to apply critical thinking instead of inebriated emotion.

     

     

     

    Says the guy with "sixpack" in his name lol. I don't drink. 

     

    Again, playing badly and losing is one thing. The issue is he completely tanked the game, and he did it against a very average defense. A lot of it was just unforced errors on his part. It's not a great sign, that's all I'm saying. Hope he turns it around. 

  5. 4 minutes ago, BobChalmers said:

     

    Yeah - it's just shocking that our rookie who in his 3rd start isn't as sharp as a 12-year vet HoF QB.

     

    What in the actual F is wrong with some Bills fans?

     

    Again, I was just responding to another poster who compared them. We don't need to compare Allen to anyone to know this game is a really bad sign, regardless of where we are in the process. It's not that he had a bad game. It's that he tanked the game for the whole team, start to finish. 

  6. 1 minute ago, joesixpack said:

     

    Aaron Rodgers is one of the best QB to ever play, and what? a 10-year vet?

     

    Come the !@#$ on. TRY to be logical.

     

     

    I'm not trying to compare them, just responding to another poster who did. Allen doesn't need to be compared to anyone to understand that he's been miserable today. 

     

    It's still very early in the process but games like this are a really bad sign. It would be for any young QB. I don't think that's all that controversial. 

  7. 8 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

    Yeah but he missed two blitzes.  Which is exactly what you criticized Allen about.  And if bourse now change the subject.

     

    Allen looks bad today.  He'll learn.

     

    The difference is Rodgers missed a couple of blitzes. Allen has missed like ten. Sometimes you're going to miss them. Give credit to the defense. But Rodgers is still making plays on one leg. They've put up 19 points and over 370 yards (and counting). We've barely been able to move the ball, and that isn't all on the oline and WRs. 

     

    I think it's ok to be disappointed by our rookie QB whom we traded the farm for. He looks worse than bad right now. He looks like he doesn't know what he's doing which is scary. 

  8. 1 minute ago, joesixpack said:

     

    He's in his third game.

     

    You expect him to have that awareness?

     

     

    I expect him to do something. He's just making mistake after mistake out there. Bad pre-snap reads. No feel for the rush or his oline. Not seeing open receivers. Missing open receivers. Missing covered receivers by 10-15 yards. Taking bad sacks. Running into bad sacks. If we had a real back up he'd have been pulled already.

  9. 5 minutes ago, MILFHUNTER#518 said:

    Ok got it sorry. And i agree, our recievers suck so much i seriously think it may be affecting Allen mentally

     

    They're definitely not helping the situation. Neither is the line. But Allen is the biggest problem today by far. He's playing like a rookie who doesn't belong on the field. If he's a true gamer he'll bounce back in the second half. Can't just come completely unglued like this. He's missing receivers by 10-15 yards!

    • Like (+1) 1
  10. I think it would be very unlikely he'd go number one overall in any draft. Too many question marks and not enough success coming out of college.

     

    Allen profiles as the third round guy who a few teams fall in love with and take in the 10-20 range of the first round. He's Kyle Boller. There's someone like him every few years. 

     

    To be clear, I'm not suggesting he's going to bust or won't be any good, just that he's another QB in a long line that entered the draft with superior physical attributes but not much success at the college level. Those guys almost never go number one.

    • Like (+1) 1
  11. To BigDing

    6 hours ago, BigDingus said:

    First off, this scenario is an easy pick for any non-biased NFL fan. Anyone saying they'd pass on Mahomes is a homer.

    Second, if we didn't grab Allen, we'd have extra picks as well. So it should be -

    A) Mahomes + 1st round pick in 2018, 2nd round pick in 2018 and another 2nd round pick in 2018

     

    or

     

    B) Josh Allen & Tre White

     

     

     

    Posted this in the other thread you started (same topic) but it immediately got locked, so I'm copy/pasting my response here:

     

    So for starters...Obviously you take Mahomes over Allen though your equation is not quite right. No where are you accounting for the extra 2018 FRP that we got for Mahomes and used to trade up for Edmunds. It should be Allen + Tre + Edmunds vs. Mahomes + 2018 FRP + two 2018 SRPs + 2018 TRP. 

     

    I think you're missing a lot of important context here. McD got hired in Jan 2017. The NFL and college season were done. All the draft intelligence was collected by Whaley's regime. Knowing what we know now, it seems pretty obvious those two men have drastically different ideas of how to put together a football team (i.e. one guy is a talent collector, the other a team builder). Buffalo trading their 2017 FRP for futures and selecting Tre, a cornerback (McD's area of expertise), makes tons of sense under that lens. Clearly McD would prefer to have more options in a future draft where he had his people in place all year, and a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the roster. So if anything, it's a little unlucky Mahomes entered the draft when he did.   

     

    The other part we're forgetting is Andy Reid. He has a history of making QBs look fantastic. Maybe Mahomes would have been good anywhere, but he definitely has a much better shot at being great studying under Reid for a year and then starting on one of the best offensive rosters in the league, coached by one of the best offensive minds.

     

    McD is a defensive coach. We're going to judge him based on wins and losses but it isn't surprising he came in wanting to fix the defense first, so we could at least be competitive. That ball hawking D also carried us to our first playoff berth in 437 years, so there's that.

     

    I can't defend all his moves, and in isolation Allen over Mahomes looks bad, but there was sound reasoning behind what McD did IMO (even if the execution was perhaps a little off). Point is there's reason to trust what he's building. And yes, they are building something with Allen, Tre, and Edmunds.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  12. So for starters...Obviously you take Mahomes and the picks over Allen and Tre. Anyone voting otherwise is a complete homer who's lost all objectivity. 

     

    That said, I think you're missing a lot of important context here. McD got hired in Jan 2017. The NFL and college season were done. All the draft intelligence was collected from Whaley's regime. Knowing what we know now, it seems pretty obvious those two men have drastically different ideas of how to put together a football team (i.e. one guy is a talent collector, the other a team builder). Buffalo trading their 2017 FRP for futures and selecting a Tre, a cornerback (McD's area of expertise), makes tons of sense under that lens. Clearly McD would prefer have more options in a draft where he had his people in place all year. So if anything, it's a little unlucky Mahomes entered the draft when he did.   

     

    The other part we're forgetting is Andy Reid. He has a history of making QBs look fantastic. Maybe Mahomes would have been good anywhere, but he definitely has a much better shot of being great studying under Reid for a year and then starting on one of the best offensive rosters in the league, coached by one of the best offensive minds.

     

    McD is a defensive coach. We're going to judge him based on wins and losses but it isn't surprising he came in wanting to fix the defense first, so we could at least be competitive. That ball hawking D also carried us to our first playoff berth in 437 years, so there's that.

     

    I can't defend all his moves, and in isolation that equation you polled looks really bad, but there was sound reasoning behind what he did IMO (even if the execution was perhaps more than a little off). There's reason to trust what he's building. And yes, they are building something.

  13. Good for Sean. I admit to questioning him hard after all the off season decisions, naming Peterman starter and subsequent benching, Leslie Frazier, Vontae Davis, etc. He seems to have righted the ship somewhat.

     

    We have arguably the worst QB and WR combo in the NFL. Some of that can be chalked up to youth, but you're not going to get better by dogging it in practice like Allen and Ray Ray did in that clip.

×
×
  • Create New...