Warcodered
-
Posts
32,027 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Warcodered
-
-
Well if he doesn't know who's starting in less than a week that's not good. Have to hope he's just full of it today.
-
Maybe Peterman is the worst but I have to say considering the timing of this poll it might pull more his way than it might later on.
-
What are the chances any of them will actually read this thread?
-
Just now, BuffaloHokie13 said:
As good as that gif is it would be so much better with a bit more of the scene in it.
-
1
-
-
Is this thread just in case he names Allen and we don't get a chance?
-
Just now, kelchlsm said:
Waste of a pick. The offense is crumbling, and hes giving up 40 points on defense.
Not impressed at all with Edmunds play- we could've used it on a fast receiver to help Allen- instead now we have Benjamin plodding down the fieldI didn't realize Edmunds was responsible for the entire defense.
-
2
-
-
9 minutes ago, Putin said:
What freakin difference will it make ?
This is not your 2014 Bills , the QB change will NOT solve a f@€*in thing , how can we throw a rookie QB in to this dumpster fire ? of an ( offense??? ) who only had a week of practice with the 1st unit ( UNTIL now )
Allen will probably do better then the preseason pro bowl Peterman but that means nothing, the ONLY thing should matter now is Allen’s development and not W -L ,
Just like you were After every preseason game Peterman played ??
Let me know when EJ’s switch will come on I’m still waiting
So what they're just going to get some bubble wrap and store him in the attic till next year? If Peterman somehow hangs on to the start and has a Peterman against the Chargers the call to bring Allen in is going to be deafening. You can't just not play your good players because the team isn't good right now. The biggest thing Allen needs is reps.
-
Just now, Kelly the Dog said:
Unfortunately, I genuinely believe that right now McDermott doesn't know himself who he is going to choose, which is frightening.
I'd say that right there should be a good answer for him. If your starter plays one game and you're already wondering if he should still be the starter then probably not.
-
1 minute ago, Kelly the Dog said:
And how exactly do you build support for NP? I think the whole team mostly gave up early in the second quarter.
Just tell them it could of been worse he could of had 5 picks...no wait they're playing the Chargers next week probably shouldn't bring that up.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:
The Chargers would never for a second believe it and be completely taken by shock and awe?
It's so crazy it just might work.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Fadingpain said:
In 1 game today Nate gave us two gifts for the price of one!
Our worst opening day beat down in franchise history and our 2nd worst beat down of any type in franchise history!
Thanks Nate!
Came into the league to break records.
Found out it's really easy as long as you're not too concerned about which records they are.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:
I'm not discounting it. I was thinking the same thing myself. I at least fully expect them to sign a FA QB. Kaepernick would be my choice, but seriously doubt that happens. Woodrum maybe o r Lynch or has been suggested, THADDEUS MAXIMUMS. Anybody just about. This isn't the QB Developmental League. We can't be embarrassing ourselves any longer. And, we are trying to win (or at least so I hope ).
Kaepernick would be a good choice but are they willing to bring in the circus that would follow.
-
1 minute ago, Kelly the Dog said:
I voted that Josh should start but won't. I don't see any reason whatsoever that McD should start NP, but then again I didn't think there was any good reason McD would start him against the Chargers or the Ravens.
Maybe but I think there might be a good chance. McDermot wouldn't throw Peterman under the bus but he didn't shoot down the idea of Allen taking over week 2. So he did leave the question out there which is something you usually don't do.
-
1 minute ago, Paulus said:
Yeah, I was really just curious.
I see only one legit argument to start Nate again, and that is to protect Allen from our OL.
I also see one legit reason why McBeane starts Nate, and that is hubris.
I was amazed to even see any Petermaniacs after that first half. I felt sorry for Nate. He was like a tiny, beaten, retarded child. The Ravens were not even proud they won. That is how bad the Bills and Nate were.
Something I thought was interesting was I didn't see any of them how up until after he was pulled. Nobody was there defending him while he was actively being terrible.
-
Just now, Fadingpain said:
You didn't provide the correct answer as an option! So I didn't vote.
Nate should NOT start, but WILL
I guess that would be the bottom one I think.
-
3 minutes ago, Paulus said:
I'm personally amazed there are still Petermaniacs out there. I was just curious to see if they are just loud, or if there really are that many.
Maybe but I think there was mainly a few hard core Peterman fans/Never Allens.
What I think happened is that a lot of people in middle shifted around through the preseason. Right before the Cincinnati there was movement towards Allen winning it. After that was mostly gone and Peterman still being preseason Peterman people shifted that way. Also it was compounded with people worried that with as awful as the line was in that game that Allen would get ruined playing behind them.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Sky Diver said:
Maybe in Madden.
Football is played in real time, not in super slo-mo or in screen shots.
Yes the catch was more difficult than it appeared at first glance but I'd say the biggest problem for Foster is that it fit into a pattern for him.
-
This might not be that far off. I mean with all the holes on this team if they can't pull together and play about as well as they can it'll probably be a pretty **** year.
Next year there is a lot of potential with more cap space and another good draft. But with a bunch of new pieces coming together the season might be a bit rough with them all fitting together.
3rd season might be really great.
-
3 minutes ago, GG said:
Everybody loves the underdog.
Unless that underdog is not talented enough to play in the NFL and also happens to play for your favorite team.
Enough with the charade. Peterman doesn’t deserve to wear an NFL uniform during the regular season.
Allen's a great underdog though he got no offers for college starting out and even now is constantly dumped on by people obsessed with his completion percentage.
-
Just now, BullBuchanan said:
Yea, I know your bias won't let you believe it's true but both interceptions were on Benjamin. Clear as day. A decent receivers catches both, and probably even has a big gain on the second one. He didn't even try to catch them and just shied away from the ball.
...yes...my bias.
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:
If I had access to the game footage I'd take a screen shot of Benjamin doing basically the same thing on both picks.
Of this game because the only place for that effect on the second one would be when Peterman threw the ball.
5 minutes ago, Sky Diver said:Are you talking about the ball that Benjamin muffed that was perfectly thrown? I don’t need to slow that down.
No the Foster throw that did admittedly hit the defender's helmet but then fell into his hand and then out of his hands.
-
1 minute ago, BullBuchanan said:
What I'm trying to say is that there's a really strange double standard going on here where the same facts are being used to trash one player and praise another who had pretty similar results. They both played poorly, but their WRs were worse than both of them, the O-line was awful, they couldn't and didn't run and the defense was a sieve. The entire team around both QBs was a constant. They performed the same start to finish. The QBs were the only variable on the Bills side and neither had any success.
What I'm also saying is the minute edge that Allen had in production should be considered with respect that the Ravens had their defensive stars on the sidelines.
I'm super confused how one guy was trash and the other "must absolutely start" based off the same results.So what you're missing is one guy moved the ball down the field and the other didn't?
-
2
-
-
Just now, Wayne Arnold said:
If only Allen could throw a more accurate ball.
Makes me hear the banana peel slipping sound effect.
-
Just now, BullBuchanan said:
against 3rd stringers.
So what are you saying that Allen did bad or that it doesn't count you really need to pick one and stick with it.
Seriously what is your argument here that Allen didn't do enough? That Peterman despite doing essentially absolutely nothing with a 0 for his QB rating should still start? What are you trying to say?
Week 2: Chargers Game Preparation - Beautiful Day for Football!
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Maybe he just wants the Chargers to finish what they started.