Johnnycage46

Post game is gonna be a doozy lol

He is also close to amillionaire... or will be...screw him lol

Did they just run a draw to end the game lol...obviously they lost but let Allen sling it!

Worst part of this 2nd half is the D cant get off the field to let Allen get more reps.

I agree and I want Allen in...but McD seems enamored with Peterman's "DNA", "menatal toughness", and sweet ass good looks. Ok I made up the last one but still.

Peterman will start next week. McD loves home some Peterman.

WHAT is the point of kicking a FG down 40????

Peterman sucks ass

I hope you are just joking around but I really laughed at this and it made this day a little better (laughing with you, not at you)

Another franchise record at the expense of the Bills.

Going for 2 lol....why not?

Sweet 1 yard run by Peterman.

Josh Allen time???? Naaahhhh

Now this I can agree on

Ok so we aren't conceding. Cool. My point is that it is clear the HUGE emphasis on the line being awful really picked up steam after preseason game 3. I know many analysts thought it would be a weak point but it appears clear the fervor of late from analysts over the line is from the preseason...again...if they use that they should use Peterman's preseason performance. It is pretty clear what I am trying to say.

Now you are assuming betting that he would say it and I am betting he wouldn't lol. I concede if you do lol.

Exactly...he is clearly using the preseason for the o line as proof of future failure but for peterman everyone should temper expectations...because it is just preseason. I dont see what is so hard to grasp about this concept.

I would almost guarantee he would not have used language like "I don't know how they are going to block anyone" had it not been for the cindy preseason game which was admittedly terrible for the line. I do believe that game changed most analyst's view of the line...which was not highly touted to begin with but the cindy game clearly made analysts cream their jeans about how bad the line will be...again, based on preseason. I actually think the line will struggle a lot. I just think analyst most certainly ARE using preseason to inconsistently strengthen and weaken certain position groups' outlook. Just be consistent.

But that's not what he said. You are trying to fill in the blanks with his logic...it is pretty clear he is basing all of his assessment on the preseason, which should just be consisten (i.e. if saying preseason performance doesn't count for one...it should not count for all)

And he's basing that on......preseason. This is an all new line for the most part so the only evidence of their performance is from the preseason...which they discounted because it didn't fit what they wanted to get across.

What I don't get is how in one sentence Daniel Jeremiah says that Peterman looked good in preseason but had to point out its JUST preseason...and then followed it up with how poor the line played...in the PRESEASON. I'm not sitting here saying Peterman OR the line will be good but if people want to discount preseason it should be consistent and not just cherry picked to fit an agenda.

Nowhere to go but up from here!

The only point that I would try to make is that it is a little odd that he didn't challenge the Allen run but DID challenge the obvious non-fumble in game 4 last night. I don't put much stock in preseason in general, but I found it somewhat interesting.

Preseason lol

This is about preseason? Seriously?