Pokebball

Lots of rationalization of inconsistent application of the law.

Both right? Or both wrong?

Why so angry?

No

The first thing that comes to mind when someone attacks the source is that it's a purposeful deflection from perhaps a valid point.

So, ignoring the personality, is she correct?

overt threat? I didn't think you had the time to do Rotary?

The federal government simply failed in securing documents. There's an entire department responsible for this for pete's sake. It shouldn't have happened.

I'm not sure how similar his situation is to Biden's. Of the three, Pence is the professional in the room.

Now do the the glorious Union army and the Apache

Not a worldwide pandemic.

critical of others tossing insults?

Actually, the ignorance of him is assuming Dems are all supportive of this trans activist movement we're seeing.

Who has good numbers in your opinion at this time?

Most in this thread isnt about gays, is it? It's largely about the trans activists co-opting the Pride flag. I don't ever recall a Catholic or Christian flag sold at Target or being used to sell bud light. I do see the similarities that you are trying to draw. I just think it's too different to really compare.

Not my experience at all. I too was raised Catholic. I attended twelve years of Catholic schooling. Best education in my City! I never felt any pressure to recruit. In fact I can't think of anyone that I recruited, even informally?

Indoctrination is simply education without the ability for reasoned debate.

Dallas is on this list every single year

We're experiencing it! We're living it.

Open and honest discussions? That seems like a hill too big to take! It's certainly too big in elementary and middle schools. At that level it's instruction, not discussion. I think we'd need to be pretty careful even in high school. I've taken college level courses where open and honest discussion has been limited, if not allowed. The teachers / professors have to be some special kinda leader to provide that sort of environment for his/her students. You and I can name those that did. But they're the exception rather than the rule.

Yes, yes we are

Yeah, kinda what I'm saying. There are exceptions, of course. CRT began at the collegiate level originally. Philosophy has it's place and I'd argue includes religious studies. But yeah, let's "ban" some of these books in elementary and middle schools. You make sure they get added to the list!

This could significantly change the education landscape across the US.

Evolution is OK. But I'm gonna hold the line at algebra The first amendment shouldn't be used to allow teachers to discuss any dang thing they want, right? They are our employees. We hire them to teach our children. We determine what they teach our children. A lot of this is starting in the classroom and that is not the proper place for it.

How do I say this? I know most of the docs in my community too. Many docs in my community have very high IQs, yet very low EQs. Very few docs serve on NFP boards, serve in civic groups, get active in business groups such as a Chamber of Commerce, volunteer as churches, etc. They are pretty standoffish at youth athletic events. If they didn't have spouses that get involved in the community, we'd see very few ever, out in public. The administration at hospitals or from clinics generally who we hear our "public" information from. Those are PSAs, right? It is not one-on-care, nor is it meant to be.